Determining the Impact of the CSN1S1 Gene on Physicochemical Properties of Milk among Three Goat Breeds of District Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan

Authors

  • Moomal Memon Department of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur Mirs, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Javed Ahmed Ujan Department of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur Mirs, Sindh, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-5621
  • Sanullah Abbasi Department of Biochemistry, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur Mirs, Sindh, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i8.2122

Keywords:

FPD, AOAC, Vitamins, PCSIR, FFA.

Abstract

The physicochemical characteristics of goat milk, such as acidity, citric acid level, density, fatty acid levels, freezing point, and urea content, contribute significantly to the quality of fresh milk obtained from different dairy production methods. Various environmental and genetic factors, such as health problems, lactation stage, breeding environment, feed intake, and genetic polymorphism, influence the composition of milk. Studies on the effects of CSN1S1 on the physicochemical properties (proteins, vitamins, and fat) of goat breeds' milk have been limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the CSN1S1 gene on goat milk physicochemical traits. The methodology consists of three types of milk samples collected from District Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan. The samples were sent to the Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) labs in Karachi, Pakistan. All the samples were analyzed for physicochemical properties, such as fat, proteins, and vitamins (A, B2, C, D, E, and K) by PCSIR in Karachi. The AOAC 2023 method was applied in this study, and HPLC technology was employed to investigate vitamins A, B2 (riboflavin), C, D, E, and K. We employed the Gerber technique for fat determination and Kjeldahl for protein evaluation. The outcome revealed Kamori breed milk had a high fat percentage (4.50%–4.90%) by Gerber analysis but showed decreased levels of protein (2.85% and 3.60%) as compared to the standard mean value of 4.82 mg/ml. The protein was estimated by the Kjeldahl method, indicating that such alterations affect the ratio between the synthesis of fat and protein. Teddy breed milk had a higher content of fat (5.42–6.90%), according to the Gerber method, but showed lower protein contents (2.85 and 2.80%) compared to the average value of 4.82 mg/ml. The physico-chemical impact of fat content was higher (3.60%–4.40%) than the standard usual value (3.4–4.2%). In comparison to the remaining two breeds of goats, we noted a great difference. The study also determined the vitamin concentration in three breeds of goats, including Kamori, Teddy, and Gulabi. Vitamin A, B2, C, D, E, and K values were measured against the overall standard range made in other studies. The Kamori breed has a mean vitamin A concentration of 103 (µg/100g) and a vitamin B concentration of 0.13 (µg/100g). Similarly, the values are Vitamin C 1.14 (µg/100g), Vitamin D 47.34 (µg/100g), Vitamin E 0.07 (µg/100g), and Vitamin K 0.18 (µg/100g). In the Teddy breed, vitamin A was measured at 98.82 µg/100 g, while vitamin B was recorded at 0.12 µg/100 g. Likewise, the values are as follows: Vitamin C 1.28 (µg/100g), Vitamin D 20.10 (µg/100g), Vitamin E 0.04 (µg/100g), and Vitamin K 0.27 (µg/100g). In the Gulabi breed, vitamin A was measured at 88.10 (µg/100g), while vitamin B was recorded at 0.13 (µg/100g). Likewise, the values are as follows: Vitamin C 1.74 (µg/100g), Vitamin D 41.72 (µg/100g), Vitamin E 0.06 (µg/100g), and Vitamin K 0.03 (µg/100g). The vitamin values among these three breeds suggest a substantial presence of vitamin D. This study concludes that there is a substantial link between variations in the CSN1S1 gene and the Kamori goat breed, particularly regarding the percentage prevalence of fat and normal protein levels across all three breeds, as well as the significant amount of Vitamin D found in each of these breeds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Silanikove, N., Leitner, G., Merin, U., & Prosser, C. (2010). Recent advances in exploiting goat's milk: Quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Research, 89(2-3), 110-124.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.033

2. López-Aliaga, I., Díaz-Castro, J., Alférez, M. J., Barrionuevo, M., & Campos, M. S. (2010). A review of the nutritional and health aspects of goat milk in cases of intestinal resection. Dairy Science & Technology, 90(6), 611-622.

https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2010028

3. Martin, P., Szymanowska, M., Zwierzchowski, L., & Leroux, C. (2002). The impact of genetic polymorphisms on the protein composition of ruminant milks. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 42(5), 433-459.

https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002036

4. Park, Y. W., & Haenlein, G. F. (2006). Goat milk, its products and nutrition. Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing, 449-488.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470113554.ch69

5. Park, Y., Juárez, M., Ramos, M., & Haenlein, G. (2007). Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research, 68(1-2), 88-113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.013

6. Kyselová, J., Ječmínková, K., Matějíčková, J., Hanuš, O., Kott, T., Štípková, M., & Krejčová, M. (2019). Physiochemical characteristics and fermentation ability of milk from Czech Fleckvieh cows are related to genetic polymorphisms of β-casein, κ-casein, and β-lactoglobulin. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 32(1), 14-22.

https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0924

7. Abay, B. T., & Kebede, T. B. (2018). Physicochemical properties and comparisons of goat and cow milk. Review. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 6(3), 416-419.

https://rjwave.org/ijedr/papers/IJEDR1803072.pdf

8. Buffa, M., Guamis, B., Saldo, J., & Trujillo, A. J. (2004). Changes in organic acids during ripening of cheeses made from raw, pasteurized or high-pressure-treated goats’ milk. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 37(2), 247-253.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2003.08.006

9. Mastrangelo, S., Sardina, M. T., Tolone, M., & Portolano, B. (2013). Genetic polymorphism at the CSN1S1 gene in Girgentana dairy goat breed. Animal Production Science, 53(5), 403.

https://doi.org/10.1071/an12242

10. Mastrangelo, S., Sardina, M. T., Tolone, M., & Portolano, B. (2013). Genetic polymorphism at the CSN1S1 gene in Girgentana dairy goat breed. Animal Production Science, 53(5), 403.

https://doi.org/10.1071/an12242

11. Park, Y., Juárez, M., Ramos, M., & Haenlein, G. (2007). Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research, 68(1-2), 88-113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.013

12. Voulsinas, L.P., Pappas, C.P., et al. (1992). Chemical composition and properties of goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 75(11), 3122–3130.

13. Chandan, R. C, Attaie, R., and shahani, K. M. (1992). Nutritional aspects of goat milk and its products. In: Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conf. on Goats, vol. II, pp. 399-420.

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19940405271

14. Graf, F., et al. (1970). Comparative analysis of vitamins in goat and cow milk. Dairy Science Abstracts.

15. Qureshi, M. S., Khan, M. A., Bhatti, S. A., & Younas, M. (2019). Genetic improvement and performance of indigenous goat breeds in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 56(2), 321–328.

16. Moioli, B., Pilla, F., & Tripaldi, C. (2007). Expression of casein genes in different goat breeds. Journal of Dairy Research, 74(1), 34–39.

17. Caravaca, F., et al. (2009). Polymorphism in the αS1-casein gene and its effect on milk composition in Murciano–Granadina goats. Small Ruminant Research, 84(1–3), 119–125.

18. Haenlein, G. (2004). Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2), 155-163.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.010

19. Jenness, R. (1980). Composition and characteristics of goat milk: Review 1968−1979. Journal of Dairy Science, 63(10), 1605-1630.

https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)83125-0

20. Bendich, A. (1990). "Antioxidant Vitamins and the Immune Response." Free Radical Biology and Medicine 9 (1): 77–83.

21. Goff, J.P., et al. (2014). Vitamin D and the dairy cow. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 30(2), 323–350.

22. Weiss, W. P. (1998). Requirements of fat-soluble vitamins for dairy cows: a review. Journal of dairy science, 81(9), 2493-2501.

https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70141-9

23. Cashman, K.D., & Flynn, A. (1999). Vitamin K: Its role in bone health. Nutrition Reviews, 57(7), 199–209.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Memon, M., Ujan, J. A., & Abbasi, S. (2025). Determining the Impact of the CSN1S1 Gene on Physicochemical Properties of Milk among Three Goat Breeds of District Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(8), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i8.2122