Assessment of Cruciate Ligament Injury of the Knee on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Taking Arthroscopy as the Gold Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2425Keywords:
Cruciate ligament injury, Anterior cruciate ligament, Posterior cruciate ligament, Arthroscopy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diagnostic accuracyAbstract
Background: Cruciate ligament injuries are among the most common causes of knee instability, pain, and functional impairment. Accurate diagnosis is essential for timely management and surgical planning. Arthroscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosis but is invasive and costly. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a non-invasive alternative, offering detailed visualization of soft tissue structures. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting cruciate ligament injuries of the knee, taking arthroscopy as the gold standard. Methods: This diagnostic validation study was conducted in the Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from December 18th, 2024 to May 30th 2025. Fifty-nine patients aged 18 years and above with clinically suspected cruciate ligament injury were included through consecutive sampling. MRI was performed using a 1.5 Tesla scanner with standard sagittal, coronal, and axial sequences, and findings were compared with arthroscopy performed within the same admission. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. Results: MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 88.2%, PPV of 95.1%, NPV of 83.3%, and diagnostic accuracy of 91.5% for ACL tears. For PCL tears, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 81.8%, 97.9%, 90.0%, 95.9%, and 94.9%, respectively. Conclusion: MRI provides excellent diagnostic performance for cruciate ligament injuries, closely matching arthroscopy in accuracy. It offers a safe, non-invasive, and reliable alternative for diagnosis and preoperative assessment in patients with suspected ligamentous knee injuries.
Downloads
References
1. Anderson MJ, Browning WM, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ. A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(3):1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116634074
2. Bronstein RD, Schaffer JC. Physical examination of knee ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(4):280–7.
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00463
3. Mohankumar R, White LM, Naraghi A. Pitfalls and pearls in MRI of the knee. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):516–30.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.12969
4. Machagge H, Mrita F, Muhamedhussen M, Haonga B, Mcharo CN. Evaluation of accuracy of clinical examination and MRI on diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal tears in comparison to diagnostic arthroscopy. Open J Orthop. 2021;11(12):353–70.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2021.1112034
5. Khan MD, Batool N, Afsar R, Arshad N, Ali A. Frequency of knee joint pathologies on magnetic resonance imaging in Lahore, Pakistan. Sch J Appl Med Sci. 2021;9(10):1619–28.
https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2021.v09i10.025
6. Khandelwal K, Chaturvedi VC, Mishra V, Khandelwal G. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI knee in reference to arthroscopy in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2018;49(1):138–45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.12.003
7. Afaq M, Talib A, Nasim R, Javed K, Butt HA, Shahid F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ACL injuries taking arthroscopy as gold standard. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(11):430–2.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221611430
8. Ullah S, Shah SDBA, Khan Q, Khan MA, Janan H, Khan A. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging knee in detecting cruciate ligament tears taking arthroscopy as gold standard. J Pak Orthop Assoc. 2021;33(2):53–6.
9. Del Piñal F, Jupiter JB, Rozental TD, Budoff JE, Ruch DS. Distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg. 2022;47(1):12–23.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934211028711
10. Khatri K, Sharma V, Farooque K, Sharma S, Choudhary M. Surgical treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with a volar variable-angle locking plate. Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5(2):e25174.
https://doi.org/10.5812/atr.25174
11. Singh JP, Garg L, Shrimali R, Setia V, Gupta V, Gupta G. MR imaging of knee with arthroscopic correlation in twisting injuries. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2004;14(1):33–40.
12. Kocabey Y, Tetik O, Isbell WM, Atay OA, Johnson DL. The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(7):696–700.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(04)00593-6
13. Machagge H, Mrita F, Muhamedhussen M, Haonga B, Mcharo CN. Evaluation of accuracy of clinical examination and MRI on diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal tears in comparison to diagnostic arthroscopy. Open J Orthop. 2021;11(12):353–70.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2021.1112034
14. Kim DH, Kwon H, Jung S, Kang K, Kim H, Yoo J. Complications of knee arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(11):2891–902.
15. Saeed M, Haq SU, Inam M. Functional outcome of volar Barton fracture of distal end radius undergoing plating. J Health Rehabil Res. 2024;4(3):1–5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.