Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Qurat ul Ain; Adnan Ahmed; Mohsin Qasim Dahri; Mohsin Qasim Dahri; Kainat Mirani; Qurat-ul-Ain

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.2432

Authors

Qurat ul Ain Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Adnan Ahmed Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Mohsin Qasim Dahri Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Mohsin Qasim Dahri Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Kainat Mirani Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
Qurat-ul-Ain Radiology Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.2432

Keywords:

Tuberculosis, X-Ray, Diagnostic Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sputum / microbiology, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Radiography

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains difficult, particularly when sputum tests are inconclusive or delayed. This study examined how accurately computed tomography (CT) detects active PTB compared to sputum culture, the current reference standard. Methods: We enrolled 151 patients with suspected PTB who underwent both chest CT and sputum culture. Radiologists assessed CT scans for features suggestive of active disease. We compared CT findings to culture results and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic accuracy. Results: CT identified active PTB in 96 patients, while sputum culture confirmed disease in 92. CT correctly classified 86 true positives and 49 true negatives. The test achieved a sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 89.0%, PPV of 93.4%, NPV of 83.0%, and overall accuracy of 89.4%. Conclusion: CT identified active pulmonary tuberculosis with high accuracy and performed well in both smear-positive and smear-negative cases. It serves as a reliable adjunct when bacteriological confirmation is unavailable or delayed, and may improve early diagnosis in high-burden settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Golden MP, Vikram HR. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. American family physician. 2005 Nov 1;72(9):1761-8.

2. Lyon SM, Rossman MD. Pulmonary tuberculosis. Microbiology spectrum. 2017 Feb 27;5(1):10-128.

https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.tnmi7-0032-2016

3. Galvin J, Tiberi S, Akkerman O, Kerstjens HA, Kunst H, Kurhasani X, Ambrosino N, Migliori GB. Pulmonary tuberculosis in intensive care setting, with a focus on the use of severity scores, a multinational collaborative systematic review. Pulmonology. 2022 Jul 30;28(4):297-309.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.016

4. Zeng J, Liu Z, Shen G, Zhang Y, Li L, Wu Z, Luo D, Gu Q, Mao H, Wang L. MRI evaluation of pulmonary lesions and lung tissue changes induced by tuberculosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019 May 1;82:138-46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.03.004

5. Van Dyck P, Vanhoenacker FM, Van den Brande P, De Schepper AM. Imaging of pulmonary tuberculosis. European radiology. 2003 Aug;13:1771-85.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1612-y

6. Komiya K, Yamasue M, Goto A, Nakamura Y, Hiramatsu K, Kadota JI, Kato S. High-resolution computed tomography features associated with differentiation of tuberculosis among elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a multi-institutional propensity-score matched study. Scientific Reports. 2022 May 6;12(1):7466.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11625-7

7. Rasheed W, Qureshi R, Jabeen N, Shah HA, Khan RN. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography of chest in diagnosing sputum smear positive and sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Cureus. 2020 Jun 5;12(6).

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8467

8. Sadaat Ullah MW, Hussain H, Ullah R, Khan N, Muhammad W. Prevalence of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Prevalence. 2022 Feb;29(02).

9. Yeh JJ, Yu JK, Teng WB, Chou CH, Hsieh SP, Lee TL, Wu MT. High-resolution CT for identify patients with smear-positive, active pulmonary tuberculosis. European journal of radiology. 2012 Jan 1;81(1):195-201.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.040

10. Heo JN, Choi YW, Jeon SC, Park CK. Pulmonary tuberculosis: another disease showing clusters of small nodules. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005 Feb;184(2):639-42.

https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840639

11. Breuninger M, van Ginneken B, Philipsen RH, Mhimbira F, Hella JJ, Lwilla F, van den Hombergh J, Ross A, Jugheli L, Wagner D, Reither K. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a validation study from sub-Saharan Africa. PloS one. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):e106381.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106381

12. Poey C, Verhaegen F, Giron J, Lavayssiere J, Fajadet P, Duparc B. High resolution chest CT in tuberculosis: evolutive patterns and signs of activity. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1997 Jul 1;21(4):601-7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199707000-00014

13. Sathekge MM, Maes A, Pottel H, Stoltz A, Van De Wiele C. Dual time-point FDG PET/CT for differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules in a TB endemic area. South African medical journal. 2010 Sep 1;100(9):598-61.

https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.4082

14. Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A. Challenges in the diagnosis & treatment of miliary tuberculosis. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2012 May 1;135(5):703-30.

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/10992_34

15. Miller AC, Polgreen LA, Cavanaugh JE, Hornick DB, Polgreen PM. Missed opportunities to diagnose tuberculosis are common among hospitalized patients and patients seen in emergency departments. InOpen forum infectious diseases 2015 Dec 1 (Vol. 2, No. 4, p. ofv171). Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv171

16. LIAM CK, PANG YK, Poosparajah S. Pulmonary tuberculosis presenting as community‐acquired pneumonia. Respirology. 2006 Nov;11(6):786-92.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00947.x

17. Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Archives of internal medicine. 1997 Apr 28;157(8):849-55.

https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440290031002

18. Li Y, Wang J. A mathematical model for predicting malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules. World journal of surgery. 2012 Apr;36:830-5.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1449-8

19. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008 Sep 20.