Fetomaternal Outcomes of Early and Delayed Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy after Premature Rupture of Membranes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2447Keywords:
Apgar score, Chorioamnionitis, Induced labor, Maternal outcomes, Neonatal outcomes, Premature rupture of membranes, Term pregnancyAbstract
Background: Premature rupture of membranes refers to the spontaneous breaking down of the fetal membranes prior to labor initiation and affects about ten percent of term pregnancies. It elevates the risk of infection among mothers and neonatal infection, umbilical compression, and fetal distress. Management of early labor induction versus delayed induction after membrane rupture remains clinically contentious since delayed treatment poses infection risk, while early treatment increases the risk of operative delivery. Objective: To compare fetomaternal outcomes between early and delayed induction of labor in term pregnancies following premature rupture of membranes. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: This study was conducted from March 2025 to May 2025 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liaqat Memorial Hospital, Kohat. Methodology: A total of 316 women with singleton term pregnancies and confirmed premature rupture of membranes were enrolled through consecutive non-probability sampling. Participants were divided into two groups: early induction (within 12 hours of rupture) and delayed induction (after 12 hours). Maternal outcomes assessed included chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, and failed induction, while neonatal outcomes included Apgar score and neonatal sepsis. Results: Early induction resulted in higher vaginal delivery rates (78.5% vs. 69.0%) and significantly lower chorioamnionitis (3.8% vs. 17.7%, p<0.001) and failed induction (4.4% vs. 10.8%, p=0.034). Postpartum hemorrhage and placental abruption were less frequent in the early induction group, and low Apgar scores were also reduced (2.5% vs. 7.6%). Conclusion: Early induction of labor following premature rupture of membranes at term significantly improves maternal and neonatal outcomes, reducing infectious complications and delivery failures compared to delayed induction.
Downloads
References
1. Garg A, Jaiswal A. Evaluation and management of premature rupture of membranes: a review article. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36615.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36615
2. Ghafoor S. Current and emerging strategies for prediction and diagnosis of prelabour rupture of the membranes: a narrative review. Malays J Med Sci. 2021;28(3):5-17.
https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.3.2
3. Giovannini E, Bonasoni MP, Pascali JP, Giorgetti A, Pelletti G, Gargano G, et al. Infection induced fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS): state-of-the-art and medico-legal implications—a narrative review. Microorganisms. 2023;11(4):1010.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11041010
4. Jena BH, Biks GA, Gete YK, Gelaye KA. Incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes and its association with inter-pregnancy interval: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5714.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09743-3
5. Alansari B, Almiraisi H, Alani R, Abozenah Y, Ghorabah M. Immediate induction versus expectant management in term premature rupture of membranes: a longitudinal analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e87640.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.87640
6. de Ruigh AA, Simons NE, Van 't Hooft J, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, Aarnoudse-Moens CSH, van Wely M, et al. Child outcomes after induction of labour or expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: study protocol of the PPROMEXIL follow-up trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e046046.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046046
7. Starrach T, Ehmann L, Volkmann H, Flemmer A, Hester A, Tremmel E, et al. PROM at term: when might be the best time to induce labour? a retrospective analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025;312(1):247-255.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07981-0
8. De Berti M, Le Gouge A, Monmousseau F, Gallot D, Sentilhes L, Winer N, et al. Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2023;13(4):e058282.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058282
9. Buhimschi CS, Abdel-Razeq S, Cackovic M, Pettker CM, Dulay AT, Bahtiyar MO, et al. Fetal heart rate monitoring patterns in women with amniotic fluid proteomic profiles indicative of inflammation. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(6):359-372.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1078761
10. Beck C, Gallagher K, Taylor LA, Goldstein JA, Mithal LB, Gernand AD. Chorioamnionitis and risk for maternal and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1007-1022.
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004377
11. Ananth CV, Oyelese Y, Srinivas N, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM. Preterm premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infection, and oligohydramnios: risk factors for placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):71-77.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000128172.71408.a0
12. Bienstock JL, Eke AC, Hueppchen NA. Postpartum hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(17):1635-1645.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1513247
13. Gupta DS, Ganatra DH. A comparative study on premature rupture of membranes at term: immediate induction with PGE2 gel vs delayed induction with oxytocin. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;3(3):15-18.
14. Shaikh AM, Begum R. A study on feto-maternal outcome in patients with premature rupture of membranes. PARIPEX Indian J Res. 2023;12(8).
https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex
15. Patel AJ, Varma AJ, Shah JV, et al. Feto-maternal outcome in patients with premature rupture of membranes: a study of 250 cases at a tertiary health centre in western India. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;15(12):418-424.
16. Yaqub U, Mushtaq R, Mushtaq M. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2015;65(2):179-183.
17. Rakshith RN, Ballu AS, Iyengar SL. Feto-maternal outcome in term primigravida with PROM: a cross sectional study at tertiary care hospital. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2024;15(12).
18. Rana M, Patra S, Puri M, Trivedi SS. Fetomaternal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membrane. Int J Infertil Fetal Med. 2014;5(1):18-21.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1075
19. Jha S, Saxena P, Saluja S, et al. Comparison of the fetomaternal outcome in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes on expectant management versus delivery at 34 weeks. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68917.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68917
20. Shafqat T, Zeb L, Fatima SS, Bhittani R. Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(5):1307-1311.
https://doi.org/10.7759/pjms.1307
21. Zia MS, Shaheen M, Haneef S, Nasir GM. Comparison of active and expectant management for fetomaternal outcome among women presenting with premature rupture of membrane at term. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2022;12(2):125-129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.