Trends and Outcomes in Reporting and Grading Complications of Urological Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.262Keywords:
Urological Surgery, Complications, Reporting Trends, Grading Systems, Retrospective AnalysisAbstract
Introduction: Complications in urological surgery can range from minor, self-limiting issues to severe, life-threatening events requiring significant medical intervention. This study aimed to assess the reporting and grading of complications in urological surgery, focusing on current trends and future perspectives. Methodology: Conducted at the Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, from 2022–2023. This retrospective study included 165 patients diagnosed with vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) or bladder urethral stricture and hypoplasia (BURSH) requiring surgical intervention. Patients with prior surgeries that could interfere with complication assessment or incomplete medical records were excluded. Results: Various surgical procedures were performed, tailored to the individual’s medical history, fistula location, and size. Surgical approaches included transvaginal repair, transabdominal repair, or laparoscopic repair. The mean age of patients was 49.23 years (range 26–74), with 90% females and 10% males. Comorbidities included diabetes (20%), hypertension (25%), and other chronic illnesses (15%), with an average BMI of 24. A history of smoking and alcohol consumption was reported in 15% and 10% of patients, respectively, while 30% had undergone prior urological surgeries. Discussion: Post-surgery, 70% achieved satisfactory urinary control, 20% experienced mild to moderate incontinence, and 10% reported persistent control issues. Minimal to moderate pain was noted in 60%, while 25% experienced transient discomfort resolving within three months, and 15% reported chronic pain. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of personalized surgical approaches, with minimally invasive techniques reducing complication rates and improving outcomes in urological surgeries for VVF and BURSH.
Downloads
References
Katsimperis, S., Tzelves, L., Tandogdu, Z., Ta, A., Geraghty, R., Bellos, T., Manolitsis, I., Pyrgidis, N., Schulz, G. B., Sridhar, A., Shaw, G., Kelly, J., & Skolarikos, A. (2023). Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Meta-regression Analysis. European Urology Focus, 9(6), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.002
Clavien, P. A., Sanabria, J. R., & Strasberg, S. M. (1992). Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. PubMed, 111(5), 518–526.
Mitropoulos, D., Artibani, W., Biyani, C. S., Bjerggaard Jensen, J., Rouprêt, M., & Truss, M. (2018). Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel. European Urology Focus, 4(4), 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014
Clavien, P. A., Barkun, J., de Oliveira, M. L., Vauthey, J. N., Dindo, D., Schulick, R. D., de Santibañes, E., Pekolj, J., Slankamenac, K., Bassi, C., Graf, R., Vonlanthen, R., Padbury, R., Cameron, J. L., & Makuuchi, M. (2009). The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Annals of Surgery, 250(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2
Kowalewski, K. F., Müller, D., Mühlbauer, J., Hendrie, J. D., Worst, T. S., Wessels, F., Walach, M. T., Hardenberg, J. von, Nuhn, P., Honeck, P., Michel, M. S., & Kriegmair, M. C. (2020). The comprehensive complication index (CCI): proposal of a new reporting standard for complications in major urological surgery. World Journal of Urology, 39(5), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03356-z
Strong, V. E., Selby, L. V., Sovel, M., Disa, J. J., Hoskins, W., Dematteo, R., Scardino, P., & Jaques, D. P. (2014). Development and Assessment of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Surgical Secondary Events Grading System. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 22(4), 1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4141-4
Slankamenac, K., Graf, R., Barkun, J., Puhan, M. A., & Clavien, P.-A. (2013). The Comprehensive Complication Index. Annals of Surgery, 258(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318296c732
Park, J. H., Kim, D. J., Kim, M. H., Park, J. K., Choi, S. H., & Lee, S. (2019). Validation of comprehensive complication index in the general surgery department of a small-volume hospital: A prospective observational study. Asian Journal of Surgery, 42(12), 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.06.003
Tirotta, F., Parente, A., Richardson, T., Almonib, A., Evenden, C., Max Almond, L., Desai, A., Hodson, J., & Ford, S. J. (2021). Comparison of comprehensive complication index and Clavien–Dindo classification in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 124(7), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26612
Furrer, M. A., Huesler, J., Fellmann, A., Burkhard, F. C., Thalmann, G. N., & Wuethrich, P. Y. (2019). The Comprehensive Complication Index CCI: A proposed modification to optimize short-term complication reporting after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 37(4), 291.e9–291.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.013
Vetterlein, M. W., Klemm, J., Gild, P., Bradtke, M., Soave, A., Dahlem, R., & Rink, M. (2020). Improving Estimates of Perioperative Morbidity After Radical Cystectomy Using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for Standardized Reporting and Introducing the Comprehensive Complication Index. European Urology, 77(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.011
Park, R., Rjepaj, C., Lehman, K., & Raman, J. D. (2017). Comparison of two indices to annotate complications after radical nephroureterectomy. The Canadian Journal of Urology, 24(6), 9103-9106.
Waldbillig, F., Nientiedt, M., Kowalewski, K.-F., Grüne, B., von Hardenberg, J., Nuhn, P., Michel, M. S., & Kriegmair, M. C. (2021). The Comprehensive Complication Index for Advanced Monitoring of Complications Following Endoscopic Surgery of the Lower Urinary Tract. Journal of Endourology, 35(4), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0825
Zhou, D., Gao, J., Liao, Y., Da, L., Wang, J., Wang, K., Zhu, J., Hu, H., Wu, C., & Tian, D. (2022). The CUSUM curve combined with comprehensive complication index for assessing short‐term complications of radical cystectomy. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 36(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24616
Löffel, L. M., Gross, T., Schneider, M. P., Burkhard, F. C., Thalmann, G. N., Bosshard, P., Wuethrich, P. Y., & Furrer, M. A. (2020). Complication reporting with the Bern Comprehensive Complication Index CCI after open radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal long-term single-center study. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 38(3), 79.e1–79.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.021
Satava, R. M. (2005). Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 14(4-5), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645700500274112
Tepeler, A., Resorlu, B., Sahin, T., Sarikaya, S., Bayindir, M., Oguz, U., Armagan, A., & Unsal, A. (2013). Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system. World Journal of Urology, 32(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1054-y
Oguz, U., Resorlu, B., Ozyuvali, E., Bozkurt, O. F., Senocak, C., & Unsal, A. (2014). Categorizing Intraoperative Complications of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Urologia Internationalis, 92(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354623
Biyani, C. S., Pecanka, J., Rouprêt, M., Jensen, J. B., & Mitropoulos, D. (2019). Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel. European Urology, 77(5), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.015
Nisen, H., Erkkilä, K., Ettala, O., Ronkainen, H., Isotalo, T., Nykopp, T., Seikkula, H., Seppänen, M., Tramberg, M., Palmberg, C., Kilponen, A., Pogodin-Hannolainen, D., Mustonen, S., & Veitonmäki, T. (2022). Intraoperative complications in kidney tumor surgery: critical grading for the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 56(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2089228
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
