Maize Germination: Trends and The Impact of Microbial Factors on Growth and Nutrient Uptake

Authors

  • Muhammad Saleem Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Samia Hassan Cotton Biotechnology Laboratory, Center of Advanced Studies and Biochemistry Department, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Ihsanullah Department of Botany, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Sadia Ibrahim Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Naveed Hashim Institute of Botany, University of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Imran Department of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Imran Ali Sani Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Balochistan University of Information Technology Engineering and Management Sciences, Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Talha Khalid Department Food Science and Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Usama Uzair Department Food Science and Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ahmad Raza Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.453

Keywords:

Maize Germination, Microbial Inoculation, Nutrient Uptake, PGPR, AMF, Sustainable Agriculture, Crop Productivity

Abstract

Corn (Zea mays) is essential to global food security, especially in nutrient-poor soils. Interactions with microbes, including plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), boost nutrient absorption and crop yield. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms by which microbial communities influence corn germination and development remain poorly understood. This study examined the influence of microbial inoculation on corn germination, nutrient uptake, and productivity to address knowledge gaps in plant-microbe interactions and their relevance to sustainable farming practices. In conjunction with field studies, a controlled experiment was conducted to assess microbial consortia's impact on corn. Seeds were inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and their performance was measured against untreated controls. Nutrient absorption was evaluated through elemental analysis of plant tissues, and growth parameters were recorded across the treatment groups. Statistical evaluation included ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests to verify the significance of the observed differences. The findings revealed a marked improvement in germination rates (93% vs. 78%), nutrient uptake (34% increase in nitrogen, 28% in phosphorus, and 21% in zinc), and yield metrics (22% increase in cob weight and 24% increase in overall yield) in inoculated groups compared to controls. Elevated enzyme activities in the rhizosphere, including phosphatase and nitrogenase activities, supported the observed enhancements. This investigation underscores the potential of microbial consortia as a bioinoculant to enhance corn productivity. These results offer valuable insights for incorporating microbial strategies into sustainable agricultural methods, particularly in nutrient-deficient soils. Subsequent research should focus on exploring diverse microbial communities and their long-term ecological effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Costa Silva Neta, I., Vilela de Resende Von Pinho, É., De Abreu, V. M., Rezende Vilela, D., Santos, M. C., Oliveira dos Santos, H., Diniz Cabral Ferreira, R. A., Garcia Von Pinho, R., & Coelho de Castro Vasconcellos, R. (2020). Gene expression and genetic control to cold tolerance during maize seed germination. BMC Plant Biology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02387-3

Feng, S., Yue, R., Tao, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, M., Wang, H., & Shen, C. (2015). Genome‐wide identification, expression analysis of auxin‐responsive GH3 family genes in maize (Zea mays L.) under abiotic stresses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 57(9), 783-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12327

Gu, L., Jiang, T., Zhang, C., Li, X., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Dirk, L. M., Downie, A. B., & Zhao, T. (2019). Maize HSFA 2 and HSBP 2 antagonistically modulate raffinose biosynthesis and heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 100(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14434

He, M., He, C., & Ding, N. (2018). Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering Multistress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01771

Jiang, Y., Su, S., Chen, H., Li, S., Shan, X., Li, H., Liu, H., Dong, H., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Transcriptome analysis of drought‐responsive and drought‐tolerant mechanisms in maize leaves under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 175(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13875

Mao, H., Wang, H., Liu, S., Li, Z., Yang, X., Yan, J., Li, J., Tran, L. P., & Qin, F. (2015). A transposable element in a NAC gene is associated with drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Nature Communications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9326

Nazari, L., & Zinati, Z. (2023). Transcriptional survey of abiotic stress response in maize (Zea mays) in the level of gene Co-expression network and differential gene correlation analysis. AoB PLANTS, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plad087

Nelimor, C., Badu-Apraku, B., Tetteh, A. Y., & N’guetta, A. S. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity for drought, heat and combined drought and heat stress tolerance in early maturing maize landraces. Plants, 8(11), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110518

Sah, R. P., Chakraborty, M., Prasad, K., Pandit, M., Tudu, V. K., Chakravarty, M. K., Narayan, S. C., Rana, M., & Moharana, D. (2020). Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7

Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Hakimi, S. M., Mo, H., & Habben, J. E. (2016). ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12603

Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Naylor, R. L., & Ray, D. K. (2018). Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 6644-6649. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718031115

Torres-Madronero, M. C., Goez, M., Guzman, M. A., Rondon, T., Carmona, P., Acevedo-Correa, C., Gomez-Ortega, S., Durango-Flórez, M., López, S. V., Galeano, J., & Casamitjana, M. (2022). Spectral library of maize leaves under nitrogen deficiency stress. Data, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8010002

Wei, N., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Hu, D., Wu, Y., Xue, J., Guo, D., & Xu, S. (2023). Characterization of the Isocitrate Dehydrogenase gene family and their response to drought stress in maize. Plants, 12(19), 3466. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193466

Yu, T., Zhang, J., Cao, J., Li, S., Cai, Q., Li, X., Li, S., Li, Y., He, C., & Ma, X. (2023). Identification of multiple genetic loci related to low-temperature tolerance during germination in maize (Zea maize L.) through a genome-wide association study. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45(12), 9634-9655. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45120602

Zhang, H., Yuan, C., Mao, G., Gao, X., Zhu, L., & Xu, X. (2019). Evaluation of saline-alkali and drought tolerance in maize varieties. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 48(4), 1047-1063. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v48i4.49053

Zhu, J., Zhou, L., Li, T., Ruan, Y., Zhang, A., Dong, X., Zhu, Y., Li, C., & Fan, J. (2022). Genome-wide investigation and characterization of SWEET gene family with focus on their evolution and expression during hormone and abiotic stress response in maize. Genes, 13(10), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13101682

Downloads

Published

2025-01-08

How to Cite

Maize Germination: Trends and The Impact of Microbial Factors on Growth and Nutrient Uptake. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(1), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.453