Frequency and Reasons for Removal of Bone Plate Following Maxillofacial Surgery

Authors

  • Mushahid Hussain Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
  • Asma Uppal Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
  • Yahya Khan Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
  • Siddique Ullah Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Ammar Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Bilal Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bolan Medical College/Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1161

Keywords:

Bone Plate Removal, Maxillofacial Surgery, Titanium Miniplates, Postoperative Complications

Abstract

Background: In maxillofacial procedures, bone plates are frequently utilized for internal fixation. However, if they are there for an extended period of time, they may cause problems that require removal. Routine removal is still up for discussion despite improvements in materials and processes. Objective: to ascertain the clinical justifications and frequency of bone plate removal in a tertiary care context after maxillofacial surgery. Methods: In a tertiary care hospital Quetta, a six-month qualitative study was carried out from October 2024 to March 2025. A total of 120 patients who had bone plate fixation and removal were included in the study using random selection. Semi-structured interviews with an emphasis on patient experiences and clinical grounds for removal were used to gather data. Results: The majority of patients (65%) were between the ages of 31 and 45. The most often fractured location (53.3%) and plate-removal site (60%), respectively, was the mandible. Most of the plates were taken out between six and twelve months after they were first fixed. Infection (31.7%), plate exposure (21.7%), and pain/discomfort (18.3%) were the main causes of removal. Less often reported causes included mechanical failure and psychosocial problems. Conclusion: After maxillofacial surgery, infection, exposure, and discomfort frequently make bone plate removal necessary. The results highlight how crucial appropriate surgical technique, patient education, and customized postoperative care are. To lessen long-term issues, more investigation into bioresorbable materials and better fixation techniques is advised.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Haug RH. Retention of asymptomatic bone plates used for or thognathic surgery and facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90644-8

Alpert B, Seligson D. Removal of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures. J Oral Max illofac Surg 1996;54:618-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90645-x

Champy M, Jaegar JH, Lodde JP, Muster D, Schmitt R. Man dibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via buccal approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1978;6:14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0503(78)80062-9

Bhatt V, Langford RJ. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: university hospital birmingham experience. J Oral Max illofac Surg 2003;61:553-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50108

Zimmermann CE, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB. Pediatric facial frac tures: recent advances in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:823-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.06.015

Brown JS, Trotter M, Cliffe J, Ward-Booth RP, Williams ED. The fate of miniplate in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;27:306-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(89)90043-0

Luhr HG. Basic research, surgical technique and results of frac ture treatment with the Luhr-Mandibular-Compression-Screw System (MCS System). In: Proceedings from the Eighth Inter national Conference on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany. Quintessence; November 1985. p. 124-39.

Spiessl B. Internal fixation of the mandibule. A manual of AO/ASIF principles. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1989.

Haerle, F.; Champy, M.; Terry, B.C. Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Osteosynthesis; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-73512

Champy, M.; Lodde, J.P.; Muster, D.; Wilk, A.; Gastelo, L. Osteosynthesis using miniaturized screws on plates in facial and cranial surgery. Indications and results in 400 cases. Ann. Chir. Plast. 1977, 22, 261–264. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197812000-00032

Yaremchuk, M.J.; Posnick, J.C. Resolving controversies related to plate and screw fixation in the growing craniofacial skeleton. J. Craniofac. Surg. 1995, 6, 525–538. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199511000-00023

Gareb, B.; Van Bakelen, N.B.; Buijs, G.J.; Jansma, J.; De Visscher, J.G.A.M.; Hoppenreijs, T.J.M.; Bergsma, J.E.; Van Minnen, B.; Stegenga, B.; Bos, R.R.M. Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177152. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177152

Yamamoto, K.; Matsusue, Y.; Horita, S.; Murakami, K.; Sugiura, T.; Kirita, T. Routine removal of the plate after surgical treatment for mandibular angle fracture with a third molar in relation to the fracture line. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 5, 77–81. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161077

Viljanen, J.; Kinnunen, J.; Bondestam, S.; Majola, A.; Rokkanen, P.; Törmälä, P. Bone changes after experimental osteotomies fixed with absorbable self-reinforced poly-l-lactide screws or metallic screws studied by plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials 1995, 16, 1353–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)91052-z

Pihlajamäki, H.; Böstman, O.; Tynninen, O.; Laitinen, O. Long-term tissue response to bioabsorbable poly-l-lactide and metallic screws: An experimental study. Bone 2006, 39, 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.009

Acero, J.; Calderon, J.; Salmeron, J.I.; Verdaguer, J.J.; Concejo, C.; Somacarrera, M.L. The behaviour of titanium as a biomaterial: Microscopy study of plates and surrounding tissues in facial osteosynthesis. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 1999, 27, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(99)80025-0

Seino, D.; Fukunishi, S.; Yoshiya, S. Late foreign-body reaction to PLLA screws used for fixation of acetabular osteotomy. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2007, 8, 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-007-0089-5

Jeon, H.B.; Kang, D.H.; Gu, J.H.; Oh, S.A. Delayed Foreign Body Reaction Caused by Bioabsorbable Plates Used for Maxillofacial Fractures. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2016, 43, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.40

Mosbah MR, Oloyede D, Koppel DA, Moos KF, Stenhouse D. Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery–A retrospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;32(2):148–151. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0329

Rai A, Datarkar A. Plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: A retrospective study. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2011;10(3):209–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0254-6

Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Infection in orthopedic implants: an overview. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine. 2011;2(2):170–175. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.92321

Mehra P, Murad H. Maxillofacial hardware complications. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2013;25(2):333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2013.01.003

Bhatt V, Langford RJ, Verma R. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: A study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;61(5):553–556. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50105

Chen CH, Chen CT, Chen YR. Infection following plate fixation of mandibular fractures: A retrospective study of 244 cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1998;56(9):1022–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90177-9

Lee JH, Lee SK, Moon SY, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with infection following mandibular fracture. Archives of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016;17(4):174–179. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.4.174

Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis E. What method for the management of mandibular angle fractures has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(11):2197–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.016

Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Gorgun B. Complications of transoral mandibular rigid fixation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1998;27(5):354–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80005-0

Bither S, Halli R, Singh V. Analysis of complications of titanium miniplates used in the management of facial fractures. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2012;11(1):90–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0207-0

Rai S, Pradhan R. Plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients: A retrospective study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;10(3):232–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0255-5

Ellis E, Ghali GE. Lag screw fixation of mandibular fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1991;49(3):234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90213-3

Banki MA, Barzilay Y. Should asymptomatic miniplates be removed? Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2007;19(1):169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2006.09.006

Eppley BL, Sadove AM. Plate removal in pediatric craniofacial surgery: Outcomes and indications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1997;100(4):1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709001-00007

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Hussain, M., Uppal, A., Khan, Y., Siddique Ullah, Ammar, M., & Bilal, M. (2025). Frequency and Reasons for Removal of Bone Plate Following Maxillofacial Surgery. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1161