The Comparative Assessment of Renal Artery Stenosis on Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Angiography in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Aleeza Tassadaq; Loqman Shah; Fouzia Farooq; Muhammad Shaharyar; Fatima Mohib; Arooj Fatima; Muhammad Wasim Zafar

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1166

Authors

Aleeza Tassadaq Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Loqman Shah Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fouzia Farooq Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shaharyar Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fatima Mohib Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Arooj Fatima Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Wasim Zafar Department of Radiological Sciences & Medical Imaging Technology (DRS & MIT), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1166

Keywords:

Renal Artery Stenosis, Hypertension, Doppler Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography Angiography, Diagnostic Accuracy, Peak Systolic Velocity.

Abstract

Background: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a significant cause of secondary hypertension and renal dysfunction. Early and accurate detection is crucial for effective management. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered highly reliable, ultrasonography (USG) remains a widely accessible and non-invasive alternative. However, the comparative diagnostic performance of these modalities in hypertensive versus normotensive patients remains an area of interest. Objectives: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and CTA in detecting RAS, with a focus on differences between hypertensive and normotensive patients. Additionally, it evaluates the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of USG against CTA as the gold standard. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients (divided into hypertensive and normotensive groups) suspected of having RAS. All participants underwent both Doppler ultrasonography and CTA. The degree of stenosis, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and renal-aortic ratio (RAR) were assessed via USG, while CTA provided detailed anatomical evaluation. Statistical analysis, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was performed. Results: Among 50 patients, 85.7% had significant RAS ≥70% stenosis on CTA. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 72.7% compared to CTA. Hypertensive patients showed higher PSV and RAR values, correlating strongly with severe stenosis p < 0.001. USG had higher diagnostic accuracy in hypertensive patients (60%) than normotensive ones 40%, though CTA remained superior in detecting mild stenosis. Conclusion: Doppler ultrasonography is a reliable, non-invasive tool for detecting hemodynamically significant RAS, particularly in hypertensive patients, but CTA offers superior precision, especially in early-stage stenosis. Combining both modalities may optimize diagnostic efficacy, with USG serving as an effective initial screening tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dieter, R., & Weber, B. (2014). Renal artery stenosis: Epidemiology and treatment. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, 169. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijnrd.s40175

Hirsch, A. T., Haskal, Z. J., Hertzer, N. R.,… Riegel, B. (2006). ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for vascular surgery/Society for vascular Surgery,⁎⁎AAVS/SVS when guideline initiated, now merged into SVSSociety for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society for vascular medicine and biology, society of interventional radiology, and the ACC/AHA task force on practice guidelines (Writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47(6), 1239-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.009

Hansen, K. J., Edwards, M. S., Craven, T. E., Cherr, G. S., Jackson, S. A., Appel, R. G., Burke, G. L., & Dean, R. H. (2002). Prevalence of renovascular disease in the elderly: A population-based study. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36(3), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.127351

Cooper, C. J., Murphy, T. P., Cutlip, D. E., Jamerson, K., Henrich, W., Reid, D. M., ... & Dworkin, L. D. (2014). Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310753

Krijnen, P., Van Jaarsveld, B. C., Steyerberg, E. W., Man in 't Veld, A. J., Schalekamp, M. A., & Habbema, J. D. (1998). A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129(9), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-129-9-199811010-00005

Mohan, I. V., & Bourke, V. (2015). The management of renal artery stenosis: an alternative interpretation of ASTRAL and CORAL. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 49(4), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.026

Zhang, H. L., Sos, T. A., Winchester, P. A., Gao, J., & Prince, M. R. (2009). Renal artery stenosis: imaging options, pitfalls, and concerns. Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 52(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2009.10.003

Williams, G. J., Macaskill, P., Chan, S. F., Karplus, T. E., Yung, W., Hodson, E. M., & Craig, J. C. (2007). Comparative accuracy of renal duplex Sonographic parameters in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Paired and unpaired analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology, 188(3), 798-811. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.0355

Vasbinder, G. B. C., Nelemans, P. J., Kessels, A. G., Kroon, A. A., Maki, J. H., Leiner, T., ... & Renal Artery Diagnostic Imaging Study in Hypertension (RADISH) Study Group*. (2004). Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Annals of internal medicine, 141(9), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00007

Radermacher, J., Chavan, A., Bleck, J., Vitzthum, A., Stoess, B., Gebel, M. J., Galanski, M., Koch, K. M., & Haller, H. (2001). Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(6), 410-417. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200102083440603

Rountas, C, Vassiou, K, & Vlychou, M, et al. (2023). Contemporary meta-analysis of renal artery imaging. Eur Radiol. 33(1), 456-67.

Granata, A, Fiorini, F, & Andrulli S, et al. (2015). Comparative diagnostic performance of Doppler ultrasound and multidetector CT in renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol. 25(2), 495-503.

Boddi, M, Sacchi, S, & Lisi, M, et al. (2015). Operator dependency of renal Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med, 34(6), 1019-27.

AbuRahma, A. F, Yacoub, M, Mousa, AY, et al. (2012). New Doppler parameters for renal artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg, 55(6), 1698-707.

Textor, S. C., & Lerman, L. O. (2013). Renal artery stenosis: Medical versus interventional therapy. Current Cardiology Reports, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0409-8

Kawashima, A., Sandler, C. M., Ernst, R. D., Tamm, E. P., Goldman, S. M., & Fishman, E. K. (2000). CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics, 20(5), 1321-1340. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se141321

Textor, S. C., & McKusick, M. M. (2016). Renal artery stenosis: if and when to intervene. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 25(2), 144-151. https://journals.lww.com/co-nephrolhypertens/fulltext/2016/03000/renal_artery_stenosis__if_and_when_to_intervene.13.aspx

AbuRahma, A. F, Yacoub, M, & Mousa, A. Y, et al. (2021). Machine learning in renal Doppler interpretation. J Vasc Surg, 74(6), 1989-98.

Boddi, M, Neri, E, Sacchi, S, et al. (2022). AI-assisted renal Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Radiol, 146, 110067.

Granata, A, Fiorini, F, Andrulli, S, et al. (2020). Sequential approach with Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 35(3), 476-84.