Influence of Wet Processing Techniques (Soaking, Boiling, and Pressure Cooking) on Phytic Acid Reduction, Mineral Retention, and Solubility in Common Beans Phaseolus Vulgaris L, VignaUnguiculata, Vigna Radiata, and Cicer Arietinum L.

Authors

  • Fazia Ghaffar Department of Food & Nutrition Sciences, College of Home Economics, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Zahid Mehmood Food Science Division, Nuclear Institute for Food & Agriculture, Tarnab, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Hina Khurshid Department of Food & Nutrition Sciences, College of Home Economics, University of Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Rabia Sana Department of Food & Nutrition Sciences, College of Home Economics, University of Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1168

Keywords:

Saoking, Boiling, Phaseolus Vulgaris L, Vigna Unguiculata, Vigna Radiata, Cicer Arietinum L., Phtate concentrations, percent phytate degradation, Mineral solubility

Abstract

Introduction: Beans and chickpeas are one of the most important crops in the world because of their nutritional quality. Phytic acid lowers the bioavailability of minerals. Heat treatment significantly improves nutritional quality in pulses by destruction or inactivation of heat-labile anti-nutritional factor phytic acid. Methodology: This study examined four local bean cultivars: Red Kidney beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L), White beans (Vigna Unguiculata), green mung beans (Vigna Radiata), and Chickpeas (Cicer Arietinum L.).  These beans were subjected to different domestic processing techniques, including soaking for 1 hour, 6 hours, and overnight, and boiling (until tender and until all water was absorbed). They were also cooked under vacuum in a pressure cooker with and without use of bicarbonate soda. The samples were analyzed for their percentage of phytate content in both raw (as control) and cooked forms, and the mineral content, percent phytate degradation, and percent mineral solubility were determined following standard procedures. Results: The effects of domestic processing on the phytic acid content of beans are summarized below. Soaking pulses for 1 hour resulted in varying reductions; mung beans had the highest decrease of 68.3%, followed by white beans at 34.1%, red kidney beans at 22.7%, and chickpeas at only 5.71%. While mung beans significantly decreased from 2.08% to 0.66%, white beans dropped from 1.096% to 0.72%, and red kidney beans from 0.97% to 0.75%. Chickpeas showed minimal change, remaining nearly the same after soaking. After soaking for 6 hours, white beans exhibited the highest reduction at 42.9%, down to 0.63%, while red kidney beans decreased by 33% to 0.65%. Chickpeas had a minimal reduction of 1.43%, remaining nearly unchanged. Mung beans showed an anomalous reduction to -0.02%, warranting further investigation. With 12 hours of soaking, mung beans again showed significant improvement, decreasing to 0.63% (a 69.7% reduction), while white beans reduced to 0.54% (50.7%). Red kidney beans and chickpeas had minimal reductions, suggesting that soaking alone is ineffective for these types. Overall, longer soaking times effectively reduced phytic acid in mung and white beans, while red kidney beans and chickpeas may require additional processing methods for better results. Boiling also resulted in a 59.1% reduction for mung beans, indicating varying effectiveness across different pulses. Conclusion: This research has validated the use of soaking and boiling to reduce the phytate’ concentrations presumably by rearranging phenolic compounds, which are likely to entrap nutrients such as minerals in chickpeas, mung beans, white beans, and red kidney beans.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.https://www.fao.org/world-pulses-day/en#:~:text=World%20Pulses%20Day%20%7C%2010%20February

Alghamdi, S.S. Genetic behavior of some selected faba bean genotypes. African Crop Sci. Conference proceedings. Afr. Crop Sci. Soc. El-Minia, Egypt, 8: 709-714.

Alghamdi, S.S.K. and A. Ali. 2004. Performance of several newly bred faba bean lines. Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 2007; 8: 189-200. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=BCfSDA4AAAAJandhl=en

Anonymous. Project coordinator’s Report of AICRP on MULLARP. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, 2012. India. https://www.arccjournals.com/journal/agricultural-science-digest/D-4172.

Pfeiffer, J M., Dun S, Mulawarman B and Rice K J. 2006. Bio-cultural diversity in traditional rice-based agro ecosystems: indigenous research and conservation of mavo (Oryza sativa L.) upland rice landraces of eastern Indonesia. Environ. Dev. 2006; Sustain. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin_Rice3/publication/226621249_Biocultural_diversity_in_traditional_rice-based_agroecosystems_indigenous_research_and_conservation_of_mavo_(Oryza_sativa_L.)_upland_rice_landraces_of_eastern_Indonesia/links/00b495237524e54b68000000

Nisar, M., Ghafoor A Khan M R. Phenotypic Variation in the Agronomic and Morphological Traits of Pisum sativum L. Germplasm obtained from different parts of the World. Russian J. Genet.2011; 47(1): 19–25. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S102279541012104X, https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541012104X

Shaukat M S. Crop Production Technology (CPT) of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) 2013. . https://pakagrifarming.blogspot.com/2013/04/crop-production-technology-cpt-of.html

https://aari.punjab.gov.pk/mung_pulses

Koul B, Sharma K, Sehgal V, Yadav D, Mishra M, Bharadwaj C. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Biology and Biotechnology: From Domestication to Biofortification and Biopharming. Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 30;11(21):2926. doi: 10.3390/plants11212926.

https://aari.punjab.gov.pk/chickepea_kabuli_pulses

Geraldo R., Santos C.S., Pinto E., Vasconcelos M.W. Widening the Perspectives for Legume Consumption: The Case of Bioactive Non-nutrients. Front. Plant Sci. 2022; 13:2054. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.772054. [

Corzo-Ríos L.J., Sánchez-Chino X.M., Cardador-Martínez A., Martínez-Herrera J., Jiménez-Martínez C. Effect of cooking on nutritional and non-nutritional compounds in two species of Phaseolus (P. vulgaris and P. coccineus) cultivated in Mexico. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020; 20:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100206.

Singh B., Singh J.P., Shevkani K., Singh N., Kaur A. Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017; 54:858 870. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2391-9.

Chaieb N., González J.L., López-Mesas M., Bouslama M., Valiente M. Polyphenols content and antioxidant capacity of thirteen faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes cultivated in Tunisia. Food Res. Int. 2011;44:970–977. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.026

Kan L., Nie S., Hu J., Wang S., Cui S.W., Li Y., Xu S., Wu Y., Wang J., Bai Z., et al. Nutrients, phytochemicals and antioxidant activities of 26 kidney bean cultivars. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017; 108: 467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.09.007.

Paredes, M., Becerra, V., & Tay, J. (2009). Inorganic nutritional composition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes race Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 69, 486–495. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392009000400002

Baldi, G & Salamini, F. Variability of essential amino acid content in seeds of 22 Phaseolus species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1973; 43, 75–78. doi:10.1007/BF00274960

Bressani, R, Elias, L G, & Navarrete, D A. Nutritive value of central American beans. IV. The essential amino acid content of samples of black beans, red beans, rice beans, and cowpeas of Guatemala. Journal of Food Science, 1961;26, 525–528. doi:10.1111/ jfds.1961.26.issue-5

World Health Organization. (2013). Health issues: Chronic diseases. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/topics/chronic_diseases/es/

Reynoso-Camacho, R., Ríos-Ugalde, M. C., Torres-Pacheco, I., AcostaGallegos, J. A., Palomino-Salinas, A. C., Ramos-Gómez, M. . . . Guzmán-Maldonado, S. H. (2007). Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) consumptions and its effects on colon cancer in spraguedawley rats. Agricultura Técnica en México, 33(1), 43–52

Paredes, M, Becerra, V, & Tay J. Inorganic nutritional composition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes race Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2009; 69, 486–495. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392009000400002

Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker HM, Fielden H. Exceptionally low blood glucose response to dried beans: comparison with other carbohydrate foods. Br Med J. 1980; 30;281(6240):578-80.

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Augustin LS, Mitchell S, Sahye-Pudaruth S, Mejia SB, Chiavaroli L, Mirrahimi A, Ireland C, Bashyam B, Vidgen E. Effect of legumes as part of a low glycemic index diet on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of internal medicine. 2012 26;172(21):1653-60.

Syed IA, Khan WA. Glycated haemoglobin--a marker and predictor of cardiovascular disease. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2011; 61(7):690-5.

Bouchenak M, Lamri-Senhadji M. Nutritional quality of legumes, and their role in cardiometabolic risk prevention: a review. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2013; 1;16(3):185-98.

Singh B., Singh J.P., Shevkani K., Singh N., Kaur A. Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017; 54:858 870. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2391-9.

Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Piña G, Oomah BD. Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health. Food Research International. 2010 1;43(2):461-82.

Lajolo FM, Genovese MI. Nutritional significance of lectins and enzyme inhibitors from legumes. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2023; 50(22):6592-8.

Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Piña G, Oomah BD. Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health. Food Research International. 2010; 1;43(2):461-82.

Oberleas D, Harland BF. Phytate content of foods: effect on dietary zinc bioavailability. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1981 ;79(4):433-6.

Gibson RS, Yeudall F, Drost N, Mtitimuni B, Cullinan T. Dietary interventions to prevent zinc deficiency. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1998 Aug 1;68(2):484S-7S.

Hoppler M, Zeder C, Walczyk T. Quantification of ferritin-bound iron in plant samples by isotope tagging and species-specific isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Analytical chemistry. 2009; 1;81(17):7368-72.

Murray-Kolb LE, Welch R, Theil EC, Beard JL. Women with low iron stores absorb iron from soybeans. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2003; 1;77(1):180-4.

Hoppler M, Schönbächler A, Meile L, Hurrell RF, Walczyk T. Ferritin-Iron Is Released during Boiling and In Vitro Gastric Digestion, 3. The Journal of nutrition. 2008; 1;138(5):878-84.

Graf E, Eaton JW. Antioxidant functions of phytic acid. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1990; 1;8(1):61-9.

Fox CH, Eberl M. Phytic acid (IP6), novel broad spectrum anti-neoplastic agent: a systematic review. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2002; 1;10(4):229-34.

Grases F, Isern B, Sanchis P, Perello J, Torres JJ, Costa-Bauza A. Phytate acts as an inhibitor in formation of renal calculi. Front Biosci. 2007; 1;12(1):2580.

Habtamu Fekadu G. . Potential health benefits and adverse effects associated with phytate in foods: A review. Glob. J. Med. Res. 2014; 14, 23–31.

Pujol A., Sanchis P., Grases F., Masmiquel L Phytate intake, health and disease: “Let thy food Be thy medicine and medicine Be thy Food & rdquo. Antioxidants. 2023; 12, 146. 10.3390/antiox12010146

Raboy V. Myo-Inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate. Phytochemistry. 2003; 64, 1033–1043. 10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00446-1

Haug W, Lantzsch H J. Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytic acid in cereals and cereals products. J Sci and Food Agric. 1983; 34:1423 1426

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 2001. Phosphorus in Plants Micro Method

AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Ed. 40-40.01 Iron—Qualitative Method Cereals & Grains Association, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.

Helbig E, de Oliveira AC, Queiroz Kda S, Reis SM. Effect of soaking prior to cooking on the levels of phytate and tannin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) and the protein value. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2003;49(2):81-6. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.49.81

Queiroz Kda S, de Oliveira AC, Helbig E, Reis SM, Carraro F. Soaking the common bean in a domestic preparation reduced the contents of raffinose-type oligosaccharides but did not interfere with nutritive value. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2002 Aug;48(4):283-9. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.48.283.

Qureshi, S., & Hamid, A. Effect of overnight soaking and boiling on phytic acid, tannins, saponins and proximate composition in legumes. Journal of Pure and Applied Agriculture. 2020; 5(3), 17-25.

Wang N, Hatcher D W, Tyler R T, Toews R, Gawalko E. Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.), Food Research International. 2010; 43(2), 2010,589-594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.012

Ramírez-Ojeda A M, Moreno-Rojas R, Cámara-Martos F. Mineral and trace element content in legumes (lentils, chickpeas and beans): Bioaccesibility and probabilistic assessment of the dietary intake. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2018; 73 (18): 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.07.007.

Fernandes A. C., Nishida W., and da Costa Proença R. P., Influence of soaking on the nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cooked with or without the soaking water: a review, International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2010 45, no. 11, 2209–2218, 2-s2.0-78349288514, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02395.x.

Wang N., Hatcher D. W., Tyler R. T., Toews R., and Gawalko E. J., Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.), Food Research International. 2010; 43, 2, 589–594, 2-s2.0-75149183539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.012

Brouns, F. Phytic acid and whole grains for health controversy. 2022; Nutrients; 14: 25

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Influence of Wet Processing Techniques (Soaking, Boiling, and Pressure Cooking) on Phytic Acid Reduction, Mineral Retention, and Solubility in Common Beans Phaseolus Vulgaris L, VignaUnguiculata, Vigna Radiata, and Cicer Arietinum L. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(4), 782-793. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1168