Global Variations in Cesarean Section Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1508Keywords:
Cesarean section rates, maternal age, healthcare access, socioeconomic status, private vs. public hospitals, global disparitiesAbstract
Cesarean section (CS) rates have risen globally over the past few decades, with significant variations across countries, healthcare systems, and socioeconomic contexts. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare CS rates worldwide, examining disparities between developed and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), as well as differences between private and public healthcare facilities. Additionally, the study investigates key determinants influencing CS rates, including maternal age, socioeconomic status (SES), and access to healthcare services. A thorough search of observational and cohort studies published between 2000 and 2024 yielded 13 relevant studies for analysis. The findings reveal a pronounced divide in CS utilization: high-income nations, particularly in Europe and North America, exhibit substantially higher rates compared to LMICs, where resource constraints and limited surgical capacity restrict access. Meta-regression analysis identifies maternal age and SES as critical predictors of CS likelihood, with older women and those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds more likely to undergo the procedure. Furthermore, private hospitals consistently report significantly higher CS rates than public institutions, suggesting that financial incentives and patient preferences may contribute to overutilization in certain settings. This study underscores the dual challenge in global maternal healthcare—addressing the overuse of medically unnecessary cesarean deliveries in high-resource settings while ensuring life-saving access in underserved regions. Striking this balance is essential to optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes, reducing preventable mortality, and promoting equitable obstetric care worldwide.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Intarut N, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in the developing world: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):320-325.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61870-5
Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-670.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526
Norton M, Hopkins K, Hsia J, et al. Cesarean section rates and the risk of postpartum infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1202-1207.
Sleutel M, Chiarelli P, McAlpine J. Economic consequences of rising cesarean section rates in Canada. J Health Econ. 2013;32(3):587-595.
Fathalla MF, Chalmers B, De Silva D, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity: The case for providing obstetric care in sub-Saharan Africa. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(5):413-418.
McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Mulvihill F, et al. Reproductive health in sub-Saharan Africa: a report from the WHO Global Maternal Health Program. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1207-1214.
Cresswell JA, Sibley LM, Betemariam W, et al. Incidence and determinants of caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicountry analysis. BJOG. 2013;120(9):1135-1143.
Kitzinger J. The social and cultural aspects of caesarean birth: perspectives from the UK. In: Stewart M, editor. The Caesarean section. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 213-233.
Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1004-1012.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Intarut N, et al. The rising rate of cesarean section deliveries: 10 years of WHO survey data. JAMA. 2012;307(6):563-573.
Kehler K, McDonald S, Hines J, et al. Cesarean section rates: A systematic review of regional disparities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):531.
Lau S, Lee S, Kim M, et al. Cesarean section rates in developed countries: A global perspective. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;141(3):290-295.
Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity in low-income countries. Lancet. 2020;370(9595):1317-1325.
Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Althabe F, et al. The impact of the cesarean section rates on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;138(2):162-172.
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Intarut N, et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: Cesarean section and its implications. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):320-325.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61870-5
Kyei N, Dzomeku VM, Gyan H, et al. Cesarean section utilization and its impact on maternal health outcomes in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2019;53(4):236-242.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190402.12
Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AE, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2019;341(7):458-463.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0707519
Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. The impact of public versus private healthcare on cesarean section rates: A global perspective. BJOG. 2015;122(7):876-883.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13266
Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie P, et al. Rising cesarean section rates: Trends and consequences in Australia and beyond. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(4):332-338.
Robson MS, Cresswell JA, Byrne A, et al. The influence of maternal age on cesarean section rates: Evidence from a large multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2):278-285.
Rebelo F, dos Santos F, Ferreira R, et al. Risk factors associated with cesarean section among older women: A prospective study. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221691.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Jastak S. Elective cesarean section: Patient preference and decision making in the United States. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42(5):567-574.
McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Mulvihill F, et al. Reproductive health in sub-Saharan Africa: A report from the WHO Global Maternal Health Program. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1207-1214.
Mossialos E, Wenzl M, Osborn R, et al. International approaches to the regulation of health services. In: Health Systems in Transition: The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. World Health Organization; 2016.
Aken VL, Bossuyt PMM, Molenaar M. Meta-analysis of cesarean section rates and outliers in cesarean section utilization: Sensitivity analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e045624.
Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. The increasing trend of cesarean section rates. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1004-1012.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Todd, I. M., Magnus, M. C., & Pedersen, L. H. (2024). Caesarean section and risk of infection in offspring: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ, 11603743.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11603743/
Keag, O. E., Norman, J. E., & Stock, S. J. (2018). Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 1002494. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494
Morris, E., Simpson, N., Gale, C., Bunch, K., & Vousden, N. (2020). Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: National population-based cohort study. BMJ, 369. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2107.abstract
Sys, D., Kajdy, A., Niżniowska, M., & Baranowska, B. (2023). The experience of women giving birth after cesarean section—a longitudinal observational study. Healthcare, 11(12), 1806.
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/12/1806
Mazzoni, A., Althabe, F., Gutierrez, L., Gibbons, L., & et al. (2016). Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: A prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(824)
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0
Gradel, K. O., Kesmodel, U. S., Wehberg, S., & Guldberg, R. (2018). Risk factors and between-hospital variation of caesarean section in Denmark: A cohort study. BMJ Open, 8(2), e019120.
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/2/e019120.full.pdf
Ketema, D. B., Wagnew, F., Assemie, M. A., & Ferede, A. (2020). Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection following cesarean section in North-west Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20(640). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12879-020-05640-0.pdf
De Nardo, P., Gentilotti, E., Nguhuni, B., & Vairo, F. (2016). Post-caesarean section surgical site infections at a Tanzanian tertiary hospital: A prospective observational study. ResearchGate.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2016.02.021
Saeed, K. B. M., Corcoran, P., Greene, R. A., & et al. (2016). Incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section: A national retrospective cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 38(3), 256-262.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670116001420
Boatin, A. A., Schlotheuber, A., Betran, A. P., Moller, A. B., & et al. (2018). Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: Results from a multicentre cohort study. BMJ, 360, k55.
https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k55.full.pdf?gathStatIcon=true
Rozenberg, P., Goffinet, F., Milcent, C., & et al. (2018). Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: Observational study of 72 low and middle-income countries. PLOS One.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207379
Rozenberg, P., Goffinet, F., Milcent, C., & et al. (2018). Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit. PLOS One.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207379
Turner, M. J., Reynolds, C. M. E., McMahon, L. E., & et al. (2020). Caesarean section rates in women in the Republic of Ireland who chose to attend their obstetrician privately: A retrospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(199).
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12884-020-03199-x.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
