Comparison of the Outcomes of Rhomboid Limberg's Flap Rotation versus Simple Excision and Closure of Pilonidal Sinus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1532Keywords:
Rhomboid Flap, Limberg Rotation, Pilonidal Sinus, Surgical OutcomesAbstract
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common chronic condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, particularly in young adults. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of Rhomboid Limberg’s flap rotation versus simple excision and primary closure in patients with pilonidal sinus disease. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore from 1st Nov 2024 to 30th March 2025. A total of 128 patients aged 18–60 years were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling and randomized into two equal groups (n=64 each). Group A underwent Limberg flap rotation, while Group B underwent simple excision and closure. Results: Group A (Limberg flap) showed significantly lower mean pain scores (VAS Day 1: 3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 5.6 ± 1.3), shorter healing time (14.1 ± 3.2 vs. 19.5 ± 4.6 days), and lower infection rate (10.9% vs. 28.1%) compared to Group B. Recurrence rate was also lower in Group A (3.1% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.01). Although operative time was longer in Group A (58.3 ± 10.2 vs. 42.6 ± 8.4 minutes), overall patient satisfaction was higher (4.4 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). Conclusion: It is concluded that Rhomboid Limberg’s flap rotation offers superior outcomes over simple excision and closure for pilonidal sinus disease, including lower recurrence and complication rates, faster recovery, and higher patient satisfaction, despite a longer operative time.
Downloads
References
Khan N, Singhal P, Chandrashekhar S, Goel D, Patel K, Deshpande N. Is limberg flap better than excision and primary closure for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective randomized study of 30 cases. Int. Surg. J. 2021;8(2): 699-703.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20210388
Jabbar MS, Bhutta MM, Puri N. Comparison between primary closure with Limberg Flap versus open procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus, in terms of frequency of post-operative wound infection. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2018; 34(1): 49-53.
https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13929
Berthier C, Bérard E, Meresse T, Grolleau JL, Herlin C, Chaput B. A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta‐analysis of randomized studies. Int. Wound J. 2019; 16(5): 1119-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13163
Soliman Mohamed S, O Alfy M. Limberg flap versus excision with primary closure in Pilonidal sinus. Al-Azhar Med. J. 2020; 49(4): 1511-8.
https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2020.120554
Wadhawan G, Sharma D, Vyas KC. A comparative study of different treatment outcomes in cases of pilonidal disease. Int J Surg. 2020; 4:292-7.
https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i3e.511
Meena OK, Kalwaniya DS, Arya SV, Kuppuswami M, Bajwa JS, Pradhan RS, et al. A comparative study of excision with primary closure versus Limberg flap in pilonidal sinus. Int Surg J. 2019;6(12):4282-9.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195194
Grabowski J, Oyetunji TA, Goldin AB, Baird R, Gosain A, Lal DR, et al. The management of pilonidal disease: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54(11):2210-21
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.055
Karaca AS, Ali R, Capar M, Karaca S. Comparison of Limberg flap and excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease, in terms of quality of life and complications. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Nov;85(5):236-9. Epub 2013 Oct 25. PMID: 24266015; PMCID: PMC3834023.
https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.5.236.
Butt SKH., Nazir A., Khan AM., Anwar IM., Waris H., Maqbool Comparison of Primary Simple Closure & Limberg Flap Technique in treatment of Pilonidal Sinus. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College.31 Dec. 22:26(4) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v26i4.1953
Jabbar MS, Bhutta MM, Puri N. Comparison between primary closure with Limberg Flap versus open procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus, in terms of frequency of post-operative wound infection. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):49-53. PMID: 29643877; PMCID: PMC5857027.
https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.13929.
Öz B, Akcan A, Emek E, Akyüz M, Sözüer E, Akyıldız H, et al. A comparison of surgical outcome of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap and Limberg transposition flap for recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Asian J Surg 2017;40:197-202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.10.002
Sarı R, Akbaba S, Gündoğdu RH, Yazıcıoğlu MÖ. Comparison of the V-Y Flap and Limberg Flap Operations in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jun;29(2):69-74. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2018.10437.
Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. PMID: 32792519; PMCID: PMC7426950.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
Chopade SP, Adhikari GR. Comparative Study of Limberg Flap Reconstruction With Wide-Open Excision and Healing by Secondary Intention in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in India. Cureus. 2022 Jun 28;14(6):e26396. PMID: 35915671; PMCID: PMC9337795.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26396.
Sinnott CJ, Glickman LT. Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with and without acute abscess: Our experience and a review of the literature. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):235-240. Epub 2019 Apr 20. PMID: 31006184; PMCID: PMC6536872.
https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.01312.
Jabbar MS, Bhutta MM, Puri N. Comparison between primary closure with Limberg Flap versus open procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus, in terms of frequency of post-operative wound infection. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):49-53. PMID: 29643877; PMCID: PMC5857027.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
