Operating Room Delays between “Time-in OT” and Skin Incision During Spine Surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i9.1616Keywords:
Operating Room, Delay, ASA, Spine Surgery, Skin Incision.Abstract
Background: The operating room is a very important component of any tertiary health-care institution. An adequately managed operating room results in increased surgical turnover as well as patient satisfaction. Delay in surgery start time is surgery starting later than the scheduled time. Delay in starting scheduled surgical procedure is a reflection of operating room inefficiency. Objective: To determine the frequency of surgical delays among patients undergoing spine surgeries and various factors causing operating room delays in spine surgeries between 'time-in OT’ to skin incision. Material and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study done at Orthopedics department, Doctors Hospital, Lahore from 15 May 2023 to 15 November 2023. Patients’ aged 12 to 75 undergoing elective spine surgeries were included. Data collection involved noting 'time-in-OT' upon patient entry and recording the duration of various preparatory steps, including IV line securing, monitor attachment, anesthesia induction, and patient positioning. Delays due to staff or equipment unavailability were also documented. The total time from OT entry to skin incision was then calculated and recorded. Data was analyzed in SPSS. Results: The mean age of 46.5 years (±15.5) and an age range of 21 to 75 years. Delays in the operating room were observed in 47% of patients, with the mean time from entering the OT to skin incision being 65.2 minutes (±30.5). Key factors contributing to delays included missing paperwork (7.4%), lack of patient preparation (8.5%), staff unavailability (8.5%), surgeon unavailability (20.2%), and anesthetist unavailability (12.8%). Other significant causes of delay were on-table review (11.7%), airway assessment (18.1%), time required for attaching monitors (9.6%), intubation (48.6%), acquiring additional venous access (26.6%), maintaining arterial line (50.0%), and patient positioning (64.9%). Conclusion: The conclusion of the study, that Operating room delays in spine surgeries were common, primarily due to missing paperwork, preparation, and equipment setup. No significant differences were observed across age, BMI, or ASA groups, indicating these are systemic issues requiring improved coordination and processes.
Downloads
References
1. Munoz, E., Tortella, B. J., Jaker, M., Sakmyster, M., & Kanofsky, P. (1994). Surgical resource consumption in an academic health consortium. Surgery, 115(4), 411-416.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/8165530
2. Bacchetta, M. D., Girardi, L. N., Southard, E. J., Mack, C. A., Ko, W., Tortolani, A. J., Krieger, K. H., Isom, O. W., & Lee, L. Y. (2005). Comparison of open versus bedside percutaneous Dilatational tracheostomy in the cardiothoracic surgical patient: Outcomes and financial analysis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 79(6), 1879-1885.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.042
3. Rutter, T. W., & Brown, A. C. D. (1994). Contemporary operating room management. Advances in Anesthesia, 11, 173-214.
4. Stavrou, G., Panidis, S., Tsouskas, J., Tsaousi, G., & Kotzampassi, K. (2014). An audit of operating room time utilization in a teaching hospital: Is there a place for improvement? ISRN Surgery, 2014, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/431740
5. Pandit, J. J., Abbott, T., Pandit, M., Kapila, A., & Abraham, R. (2012). Is ‘starting on time’ useful (or useless) as a surrogate measure for ‘surgical theatre efficiency’?*. Anaesthesia, 67(8), 823-832.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07160.x
6. Wong, J., Khu, K. J., Kaderali, Z., & Bernstein, M. (2010). Delays in the operating room: signs of an imperfect system. Canadian Journal of surgery, 53(3), 189.
7. Kimbrough, C. W., McMasters, K. M., Canary, J., Jackson, L., Farah, I., Boswell, M. V., Kim, D., & Scoggins, C. R. (2015). Improved operating room efficiency via constraint management: Experience of a tertiary-care academic medical center. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 221(1), 154-162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.032
8. Palter, V. N., Simpson, A. N., Yeung, G., Lee, J. Y., Grantcharov, T. P., & Shore, E. M. (2020). Operating room utilization: A retrospective analysis of perioperative delays. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 36(3), 109-114.
https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2019.0120
9. Cox Bauer, C. M., Greer, D. M., Vander Wyst, K. B., & Kamelle, S. A. (2016). First-case operating room delays: Patterns across urban hospitals of a single health care system. Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews, 3(3), 125-135.
https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1265
10. Hicks, K. B., Glaser, K., Scott, C., Sparks, D., & McHenry, C. R. (2020). Enumerating the causes and burden of first case operating room delays. The American Journal of Surgery, 219(3), 486-489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.016
11. Wright, J. G., Roche, A., & Khoury, A. E. (2010). Improving on-time surgical starts in an operating room. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53(3), 167.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2878988/
12. PANNI, M. K., SHAH, S. J., CHAVARRO, C., RAWL, M., WOJNARWSKY, P. K., & PANNI, J. K. (2013). Improving operating room first start efficiency – value of both checklist and a pre‐operative facilitator. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 57(9), 1118-1123.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12166
13. Does, R. J., Vermaat, T. M., Verver, J. P., Bisgaard, S., & Van Den Heuvel, J. (2009). Reducing start time delays in operating rooms. Journal of Quality Technology, 41(1), 95-109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2009.11917763
14. Dexter, F., Epstein, R., Marcon, E., & Ledolter, J. (2005). Estimating the incidence of prolonged turnover times and delays by time of day. Anesthesiology, 102(6), 1242-1248.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200506000-00026
15. Lee, S., Dai, T., Phan, P. H., Moran, N., & Stonemetz, J. (2022). The association between timing of elective surgery scheduling and operating theater utilization: A cross-sectional retrospective study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 134(3), 455-462.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005871
16. Azar, M., Carrasco, R. A., & Mondschein, S. (2022). Dealing with uncertain surgery times in operating room scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(1), 377-394.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.010
17. Deldar, R., Soleimani, T., Harmon, C., Stevens, L. H., Sood, R., Tholpady, S. S., & Chu, M. W. (2017). Improving first case start times using lean in an academic medical center. The American Journal of Surgery, 213(6), 991-995.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.025
18. Schuster, M., Pezzella, M., Taube, C., Bialas, E., Diemer, M., & Bauer, M. (2013). Delays in starting morning operating lists. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international.
https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0237
19. England, N. H. S., & Improvement, N. H. S. (2019). Provisional publication of Never Events reported as occurring between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019. Retrieved December, 2, 2020.
20. Serou, N., Sahota, L., Husband, A. K., Forrest, S. P., Moorthy, K., Vincent, C., Slight, R. D., & Slight, S. P. (2017). Systematic review of psychological, emotional and behavioural impacts of surgical incidents on operating theatre staff. BJS Open, 1(4), 106-113.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.21
21. Di Cristofaro, L., Ruffolo, C., Pinto, E., Massa, M., Antoniutti, M., Cagol, M., ... & Scarpa, M. (2014). Complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect quality of life and surgeon–patient relationship. Colorectal disease, 16(12), O407-O419.
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12752
22. Hughes, C., Travaglia, J. F., & Braithwaite, J. (2010). Bad stars or guiding lights? Learning from disasters to improve patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(4), 332–336.
https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.030148
23. Leistikow, I., Mulder, S., Vesseur, J., & Robben, P. (2016). Learning from incidents in healthcare: the journey, not the arrival, matters. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(3), 252–256.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
