Spectrum of Laboratory Errors Encountered in the Total Testing Process of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Laboratory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.1693Keywords:
Pre-analytical Error, Post Analytical Errors, Laboratory Error, Clinical Chemistry, HematologyAbstract
Background: Monitoring laboratory performance continuously is critical for recognizing errors and promoting further improvements in laboratory. This study aimed to review the laboratory errors in the preanalytical, analytical and post analytical phases of testing in a clinical laboratory. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study was carried out at our clinical chemistry, hematology, immunoassay and coagulation laboratories in CHK - Central laboratory Dr. Ruth K.M Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, over a period of 1-year period, from November 2022 to November 2023 and the findings of pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical errors were analyzed of 413631 samples. Results: Errors were detected in 281467 samples out of 413631 samples with total error rate of 68%. Results of the study showed that Preanalytical errors were most common with a frequency of 97.25%, followed by post analytical errors 2.5% and analytical errors 0.25% respectively. Conclusions: The study concludes that pre-analytical, analytical, and post analytical errors arising in laboratory not only lead to wrong diagnosis and treatment of patient they also effect the cost, inventory and human resource as well. The results of our study suggest that more efforts are to be made for training of phlebotomy, sample collection and transport of specimens.
Downloads
References
1. Carver, N., Gupta, V., & Hipskind, J. E. (2023). Medical Errors (Archived). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
2. ISO/WD TS 22367: Medical laboratories - Reduction of error through risk management and continual improvement.
https://doi.org/10.3403/30117019
3. Boone, D. J. (1993). Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance. Clinical Chemistry, 39(7), 1461-1467.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/39.7.1461
4. Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002). Errors in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 48(5), 691-698.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691
5. Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Montagnana, M., Franchini, M., & Guidi, G. C. (2006). Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clinical laboratory, 52(5-6), 217-230.
6. Najat, D. (2017). Prevalence of pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry diagnostic labs in Sulaimani city of Iraqi Kurdistan. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0170211.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170211
7. Assessment of total laboratory errors in clinical chemistry laboratory: Experience at a tertiary care hospital. (2022). Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care.
https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.4.7
8. Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002). Errors in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 48(5), 691-698.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691
9. Howanitz, P. J. (2005). Errors in laboratory medicine: Practical lessons to improve patient safety. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 129(10), 1252-1261.
https://doi.org/10.5858/2005-129-1252-eilmpl
10. Astion, M. L., Shojania, K. G., Hamill, T. R., Kim, S., & Ng, V. L. (2003). Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 120(1), 18-26.
https://doi.org/10.1309/8u5d0ma6mfh2fg19
11. Plebani, M. (2007). Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: The road ahead. Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine, 45(6).
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2007.170
12. Simundic, A., Church, S., Cornes, M. P., Grankvist, K., Lippi, G., Nybo, M., Nikolac, N., Van Dongen-Lases, E., Eker, P., Kovalevskaya, S., Kristensen, G. B., Sprongl, L., & Sumarac, Z. (2015). Compliance of blood sampling procedures with the CLSI H3-A6 guidelines: An observational study by the European Federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 53(9).
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1053
13. World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. In WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy (pp. 130-130).
14. Cadamuro, J., Simundic, A., Ajzner, E., & Sandberg, S. (2017). A pragmatic approach to sample acceptance and rejection. Clinical Biochemistry, 50(10-11), 579-581.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.001
15. Toll, A. D., Liu, J. M., Gulati, G., Behling, E. M., & Kocher, W. D. (2011). Does routine repeat testing of critical values offer any advantage over single testing? Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 135(4), 440-444.
https://doi.org/10.5858/2010-0025-oa.1
16. Goswami, B., Singh, B., Chawla, R., & Mallika, V. (2010). Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: A one-year experience. cclm, 48(1), 63-66.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2010.006
17. Alavi, N., Khan, S. H., Saadia, A., & Naeem, T. (2020). Challenges in preanalytical phase of laboratory medicine: rate of blood sample nonconformity in a tertiary care hospital. Ejifcc, 31(1), 21.
18. Ricós, C., García-Victoria, M., & Fuente, B. D. (2004). Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 42(6).
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2004.100
19. Witte, D. L., VanNess, S. A., Angstadt, D. S., & Pennell, B. J. (1997). Errors, mistakes, blunders, outliers, or unacceptable results: How many? Clinical Chemistry, 43(8), 1352-1356.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.8.1352
20. Hurst, J. (1998). Are physicians' office laboratory results of comparable quality to those produced in other laboratory settings? JAMA, 279(6), 468.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.6.468
21. Stull, T. M. (1998). Variation in proficiency testing performance by testing site. JAMA, 279(6), 463.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.6.463
22. Watts, N. B. (1995). Reproducibility (precision) in alternate site testing. A clinician's perspective. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 119(10), 914-917.
23. Plebani, M., Sciacovelli, L., & Aita, A. (2017). Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 37(1), 187-205.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
