Role of LED versus Conventional Phototherapy in Full-Term Newborn having Jaundice Neonatorum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2022Keywords:
Phototherapy, Neonatal Jaundice, LED, bilirubinAbstract
Background: Neonatal jaundice, which is defined by elevated unconjugated bilirubin, affects the majority of newborns and, if severe, can result in acute bilirubin encephalopathy and kernicterus. Phototherapy is the first-line treatment for converting bilirubin into excretable isomers. Conventional systems using fluorescent or halogen bulbs provide broad-spectrum light, but generate excess heat, require frequent bulb changes, and produce uneven irradiance. The objective was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and bilirubin kinetics of light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy to conventional phototherapy in full-term neonates with non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia. Methods: From 28th November -26th May 2024, 200 term neonates (≥37 weeks' gestation; birth weight ≥2.5 kg) with total serum bilirubin levels between 15 and 20 mg/dL participated in a single-center randomized controlled trial at DHQ Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either narrow-band LED phototherapy (peak 460 nm; irradiance 35 µW/cm²/nm) or standard fluorescent phototherapy (broad-spectrum; irradiance 15 µW/cm²/nm). Total serum bilirubin was measured at baseline and every six hours until therapy was discontinued. The primary outcome was the rate of bilirubin decline (mg/dL per hour). Secondary outcomes included total phototherapy duration (hours), incidence of hypothermia and hyperthermia, oxidative stress index change, and the need for an exchange transfusion. Results: LED phototherapy had a significantly higher mean bilirubin decline rate (0.19 ± 0.05 mg/dL/hour) than conventional therapy (0.14 ± 0.04 mg/dL/hour). The LED group had a shorter treatment duration (24.3 ± 5.2 hours compared to 29.8 ± 6.1 hours). The LED group had fewer hypothermia and hyperthermia episodes, and their oxidative stress index increased less. No infants in either group needed an exchange transfusion. Conclusion: LED phototherapy is more effective and safer than conventional phototherapy for term neonates with moderate non-hemolytic jaundice. It reduces bilirubin faster, takes less time to treat, and has fewer thermal and oxidative side effects.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed IA, Farhan SS, Hommadi SA, Murad MM. Effect of Phototherapy on Serum Ionized Calcium Level in Term Neonates with Unconjugated Hyperbilirubinemia. Iraqi Med J. 2O2O; 66(1): 25-9.
2. Jha CB, Rimal HS, Subedi RB. Phototherapy induced hypocalcemia in icteric newborns attending Birat Medicai College Teaching Hospital, Morang, Nepal. J Chitwan MedCoLl.2022; 12(a0):10-13.
https://doi.org/10.54530/jcmc.653
3. Usharani M and Santhanaiakshmi L. Effect of Phototherapy on Serum Caicium Levels in Term Neonates with Unconjugated Hyperbilirubinemia. Int J Adv Res.20l7; 5(6); 21a9-53.
4. Watchko JF. Neonatal bilirubin encephalopathy. Clin Perinatol. 2020;47(1):61–73.
5. Elsary AY, Elgameel AA, Mohammed WS, Zoki OM, Taha SA. Neonata,l hypocalcemia and its relation to vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Saudi Med J. 2018; 39(31:2a7-53.
https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.3.21679
6. Bibi A, Alam W, Asghar I, Ali R. Effect of head covering on hypocalcemia resulting from phototherapy in full-term neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. Pak Armed Forces Med J.2O2O;70gl:LL84-52.
7. Nabi F, et al. Irradiance and efficacy of phototherapy units in Pakistan. Med Devices (Auckl). 2022;15:31–38.
8. Erol S, Arslan AH, Isik D, BA$ A, Demirell NI, EREL O. The effects of bilirubin and phototherapy on neonatal thiol-disulfide homeostasis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2OL9; 29(91: 843-7).
https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.843
9. B, Shah SA, Subhani FA, Ayub A, Shiekh SA. Comparison of Effects of LED Phototherapy with Compact Fluorescent Phototherapy in Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2023;73(21: 337-340.
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i2.6824
10. Mehta C, Gayatri K, Chaudhari Dg, Patel B, Bansal S, Patel J. Comparison of Light Emitting Diode Phototherapy vs Conventional Phototherapy for Neonatal Hypi:rbilirubinemir.: A Quasi-experimental Study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2021; 15(7):8- 10.
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2021/49430.15134
11. Gutta S, Shenoy J, Kamath SP, Mithra P, Baliga BS, Sarpangala M, et al. Light emitting diode (LED) phototherapy versus conventional phototherapy in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a single blinded randomized control trial from coastal India. BioMed Research International. 20L9; e6274719.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6274719
12. Ahmed F, et al. Comparison of oxidative stress after phototherapy. Neonatology. 2023;113(2):163–170.
13. Calabia VMV, et al. Low-cost LED prototype efficacy and safety: a pilot study. Med Devices (Auckl). 2020;13:35–42.
14. Seidman DS, et al. Blue LED vs halogen-quartz phototherapy. J Pediatr. 2000;136(6):771–774.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(00)75202-4
15. Olusanya BO, et al. Broad-spectrum light vs LED in late preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(4):F325–F331.
16. Ambalavanan N, et al. Comparative clinical trial of LED phototherapy. Pediatr Res. 2021;89(4):803–808.
17. Srinivas T, Kumar A. Thermal safety of phototherapy: a systematic review. J Trop Pediatr. 2023;69(2):fes061.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.