Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine + Nalbuphine with Bupivacaine alone for Intraoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Caesarean Section

Authors

  • Safa Ahmed Department of Anesthesia, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Liaquat Ali Department of Anesthesia, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ayesha Qazi Department of Anesthesia, IIMCT- Pakistan Railway Hospital, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2219

Keywords:

Analgesia, Bupivacaine, Cesarean Section, Intrathecal Administration, Nalbuphine

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with nalbuphine and bupivacaine alone for intraoperative analgesia in cesarean section procedures. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and duration of study: Department of Anesthesia, Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi from March 2025 to May 2025. Methods: A total of 70 pregnant women aged >18 to < 45 years with a gestational age ≥ 37 weeks, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this study and randomized into two equal groups of 35 patients each. Women in Group BN received intrathecal bupivacaine with nalbuphine, while women in Group B only received intrathecal bupivacaine. The primary outcomes were set as block onset time and block duration (both sensory and motor) while secondary outcomes included time to rescue analgesia and the occurrence of adverse events. Results: The mean age of women in this study was 28.74 ± 5.4 years ranging from 19 to 42 years. The results of primary outcomes of the study showed that addition of nalbuphine significantly accelerated the block onset (both sensory and motor, with p< 0.0001 and p<0.001 respectively) and prolonged duration of block (Both sensory and motor, p<0.001 for both).  Time required for the first rescue analgesia was also significantly higher in Group BN compared to Group B (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups for different adverse events recorded during the study. Conclusion: Nalbuphine when combined with intrathecal bupivacaine offered significantly faster onset of both sensory and motor blockade, prolonged duration of anesthetic effect, and prolonged time to rescue analgesia in cesarean section procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. WHO. (2021). Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access.

https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access

2. Betran, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A., Souza, J. P., & Zhang, J. (2021). Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6(6), e005671.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671

3. Zeleke, M. E., Chekol, W. B., Kasahun, H. G., Mekonnen, Z. A., Filatie, T. D., Melesse, D. Y., Admassie, B. M., & Admass, B. A. (2024). Perioperative management of surgical procedure during pregnancy: A systematic review. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 86(6), 3432-3441.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002057

4. Nunes, I., Nicholson, W., & Theron, G. (2023). FIGO Childbirth and Postpartum Hemorrhage Committee. FIGO good practice recommendations on surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications during cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 163(S2), 21-33.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15117

5. Neall, G., Bampoe, S., & Sultan, P. (2022). Analgesia for caesarean section. BJA Education, 22(5), 197-203.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.12.008

6. Shafiei, F. T., McAllister, R. K., & Lopez, J. (2020). Bupivacaine. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532883/

7. Horn, R., Kramer, J., & Hendrix, J. M. (2024, January 30). Postoperative pain control. PubMed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544298/

8. Swain, A., Nag, D. S., Sahu, S., & Samaddar, D. P. (2017). Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 5(8), 307.

https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v5.i8.307

9. Larsen, D., & Maani, C. V. (2023, January 9). Nalbuphine. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534283/

10. Farmawy, M. S., Mowafy, S. M., & Wahdan, R. A. (2023). Epidural nalbuphine versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgeries for postoperative analgesia: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 23(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02348-x

11. Amin, S. R., I S., & Abdelzaam, E. M. (2023). Intrathecal midazolam is a comparable alternative to fentanyl and nalbuphine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section; a randomized controlled double-blind trial. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 27(1), 89-96.

https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v27i1.1923

12. Charles, E. A., Carter, H., Stanford, S., Blake, L., Eley, V., Carvalho, B., Sultan, P., Kua, J., & O’Carroll, J. E. (2025). Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery under Neuraxial anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 143(1), 156-167.

https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005486

13. Bachula, L., Rahul Dev, N., Shiva, P., & Cherukuri, S. K. (2024). Comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine in combination with nalbuphine and bupivacaine for subarachnoid block in a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine, 12, 38.

https://doi.org/10.34172/jrcm.34742

14. Deori, K. C., Taye, M. K., & Lahkar, B. (2023). Comparative study on regression time of block and adverse effects of nalbuphine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine: A prospective randomized double-blind study. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 15(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00382-y

15. Mohamed, S. A., Elsonbaty, A., & Elsonbaty, M. (2021). A comparison between intrathecal Nalbuphine and fentanyl for Intraoperative pain management during uterine exteriorization in cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(B), 533-540.

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6531

16. Gupta, K. L., Gupta, A., & Neeraj, .. (2017). Efficiency of nalbuphine as an adjuvant to bupivancaine in lower limb orthopaedic surgery-a prospective study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(2), 623.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20170163

17. Shalini, A., Kokila, N., Manjunatha, H, G., Supriya, L. (2020). Comparative study of intrathecal nalbuphine versus clonidine as adjuvants to 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine for elective infra umbilical surgeries. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care.

https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v23i4.1169

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Ahmed, S., Ali, L., & Qazi, A. (2025). Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine + Nalbuphine with Bupivacaine alone for Intraoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Caesarean Section. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 862-866. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2219