Cross Sectional Study to Evaluate the Reason for Removal of LARC Contraception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2262Keywords:
LARC, long-acting reversible contraception, reproductive age, women, Reproductive health managementAbstract
Objective: To determine the frequency of various reasons for removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among women of reproductive age presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) from March, 2025 to May, 2025 and Reproductive Health Services Center, Population Welfare Department (PWD), Karachi. A total of 143 women aged 15–45 years who were using LARC and planned to have it removed were included through non-probability consecutive sampling. A self-designed proforma was used to document demographic details and reasons for LARC removal. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Frequencies and percentages were calculated, and stratification was done based on education, residence, and socioeconomic status. Results: Out of 143 participants, the most common reason for LARC removal was completion of the contraceptive period (44.0%), followed by desire to conceive (21.0%) and opting for another method (17.5%). Husband disapproval was reported in 8.4% of cases. Irregular per vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal pain were noted in 5.6% and 3.5% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: Most women discontinued LARC for planned or non-medical reasons, indicating a positive trend in contraceptive utilization. However, factors such as spousal disapproval and mild physical complaints contributed to early removal. Strengthening counseling, involving partners in family planning, and managing minor side effects can improve LARC continuation rates and overall reproductive health outcomes.
Downloads
References
1. GBD 2019 Pakistan Collaborators. The state of health in Pakistan and its provinces and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(2):e229–e243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00497-1
2. Durante JC, Sims J, Jarin J, Gold MA, Messiah SE, Francis JKR. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents: a review of practices to support better communication, counseling, and adherence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2023;14:97–114.
https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S374268
3. Laksono AD, Rohmah N, Megatsari H. Barriers for multiparous women to using long-term contraceptive methods in Southeast Asia: case study in Philippines and Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1425.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13844-z
4. Gebeyehu NA, Tegegne KD, Biset G, Sewuyew DA, Alemu BW, Yitayew AM. Discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptive use and its determinants among women in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:979231.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.979231
5. Sisay A, Teshome A, Bizuneh H, D Compton S. Early discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives at four government hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Contracept Reprod Med. 2023;8(1):38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00238-8
6. Tegegne KD, Yeshambel A, Gebrehiwot T, Wubneh CA. Determinants of early discontinuation of contraceptive implants among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):173.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01740-2
7. Alemu BW, Tegegne KD, Melaku YA. Discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):153.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01165-1
8. Moseson H, Herold S, Filippa S, Castle C, Gerdts C. Effectiveness of contraceptive counseling in reducing early discontinuation of LARC: a systematic review. Contraception. 2020;101(1):26–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.001
9. Yimer NB, Tenaw Z, Gedefaw A. Pregnancy outcomes in grand multiparous women: does parity matter? A comparative study. Ethiop J Reprod Health. 2020;12(1):11.
https://doi.org/10.69614/ejrh.v12i1.247
10. Dasa TT, Okunlola MA, Dessie Y. Multilevel analysis of grand multiparity: trend and its determinants in the Sidama National Regional State of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(8):e061697.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061697
11. Tadese M, Dagne K, Wubetu AD, Abeway S, Bekele A, Misganaw Kebede W, et al. Assessment of adverse pregnancy outcomes and associated factors among deliveries at Debre Berhan Hospital, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0271287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271287
12. Dasa TT, Okunlola MA, Dessie Y. Effect of grand multiparity on adverse maternal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:959633.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.959633
13. Muhumuza Kananura R, et al. Factors associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Uganda. BMC Women's Health. 2022;22(1):180.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01735-z
14. Owonikoko KM, et al. Contraceptive use and switching behavior among Nigerian women: a retrospective study. Afr Health Sci. 2023;23(1):350–358.
https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v23i1.32
15. Sharma A, et al. Male involvement in family planning and its effect on contraceptive uptake in India: a community-based study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2021;47(1):45–51.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200582
16. Jonas K, Crutzen R, van den Borne B, Reddy P. Discontinuation of contraceptives in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e034456.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034456
17. Gebeyehu NA, et al. Discontinuation of LARC in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2022;10:979231.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.979231
18. Huda FA, et al. Contraceptive discontinuation and switching behavior in urban slums of Bangladesh. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46:27–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.