Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of Single Upper Ureteral Calculi Measuring 1 to 2 cm

Authors

  • Nadeem Sohail Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Riaz Ahmed Khan Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Maaz Khan Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Tariq Zada Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Idress Ismail Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Shoaib Khan Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2268

Keywords:

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Flexible Ureterorenoscopy, Ureteral Stones, Stone Clearance, Urolithiasis.

Abstract

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1–2 cm. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, over a period of three months from February 2025 to May 2025. A total of 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups: Group A underwent PCNL, while Group B underwent FURS. Preoperative evaluation included non-contrast CT scan, serum creatinine, urine culture, and other routine investigations. Stone clearance at 3 months (confirmed by CT scan) was defined as the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the PCNL group compared to FURS (74.2 ± 12.4 vs. 89.6 ± 14.1 minutes, p<0.001). The stone-free rate was markedly higher in the PCNL group (90.4%) compared to the FURS group (67.3%, p=0.004). Overall complication rates were similar between groups (28.8% vs. 23.1%, p=0.52), with fever, hematuria, and urinary tract infection being the most frequent events. Stratified analysis showed consistently superior clearance with PCNL across subgroups defined by age, gender, BMI, and urine culture status. Conclusion: PCNL provides superior stone clearance and shorter operative times compared to FURS in patients with single upper ureteral stones measuring 1–2 cm, while both procedures are safe and associated with acceptable complication rates. PCNL should be considered the preferred approach in this clinical scenario, whereas FURS remains a reasonable alternative for selected patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Li, Z., Zhang, H. R., Chen, W. D., Luo, H., Xu, W. J., Gao, Q. G., ... & Lei, M. H. (2023). Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2-3 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences, 27(22).

https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/11115-11121.pdf

2. Xuan, H., Du, Z., Xia, L., Cao, Y., Chen, Q., & Xue, W. (2022). Comparison of outcomes between flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of upper calyceal calculi larger than 2 CM. BMC Urology, 22(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01142-0

3. Lv, G., Wang, K., Zhang, Z., Zhou, C., Li, Y., & Zhang, D. (2022). Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for renal calculi larger than 2 CM: A matched-pair analysis. Urolithiasis, 50(4), 501-507.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01336-z

4. Guo, Y., Yang, L., Xu, X., & Li, C. (2022). Clinical comparative study of standard channel percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscope and traditional standard channel combined with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of multiple renal calculi without hydrone. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(7).

https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.7.5526

5. Lv, G., Zhang, Z., Du, F., Qi, W., Zhong, M., Zhou, Y., Zhou, C., Li, Y., & Zhang, D. (2022). Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis. Frontiers in Surgery, 9.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004432

6. Jia, H., Li, J., Liu, B., Zhang, P., Yusufu, A., Nan, Y., Li, X., Wen, B., Pu, C., Du, W., & Wang, S. (2020). Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1–2 CM) in children. World Journal of Urology, 39(1), 195-200.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03150-x

7. Meng, C., Peng, L., Li, J., Li, Y., Li, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Comparison between single-use flexible Ureteroscope and reusable flexible Ureteroscope for upper urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Surgery, 8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170

8. He, Q., Wei, X., Wu, E., Luo, R., Yu, L., & Liang, W. (2024). Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters: A retrospective study. BMC Urology, 24(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01408-9

9. Kang, D. H., Cho, K. S., Chung, D. Y., Jeong, W. S., Jung, H. D., Kim, D. K., & Lee, J. Y. (2020). Comparison of the stone-free rates of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-16120/v1

10. Cosmin, C., Georgescu, D. A., Geavlete, P., Popescu, R., & Geavlete, B. (2023). Comparison between retrograde flexible Ureteroscopy and percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones of 2–4 CM. Medicina, 59(1), 124.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010124

11. Zhang, Y., Li, J., Jiao, J. W., & Tian, Y. (2021). Comparative outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric kidney stones larger than 2 CM. International Journal of Urology, 28(6), 650-655.

https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14532

12. Lv, G., Zhou, Y., Qi, W., Zhong, M., Li, R., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of 1–2 cm single nephrolithiasis and multiple nephrolithiasis. Frontiers in Surgery, 10.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1114206

13. Doizi, S., Uzan, A., Keller, E. X., De Coninck, V., Kamkoum, H., Barghouthy, Y., Ventimiglia, E., & Traxer, O. (2020). Comparison of intrapelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in a kidney model. World Journal of Urology, 39(7), 2709-2717.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03450-2

14. Huang, X., Zhong, L., Huang, Z., & Lai, H. (2024). A retrospective comparison of sun’s tip-flexible semirigid ureterorenoscopy, super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy applied to treat upper urinary tract calculi. BMC Urology, 24(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01412-z

15. Fankhauser, C. D., Weber, D., Müntener, M., Poyet, C., Sulser, T., & Hermanns, T. (2021). Effectiveness of flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi of 5–15 mm: Results of a randomized controlled trial. European Urology Open Science, 25, 5-10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.001

16. Chen, Y., Xi, H., Yu, Y., Cheng, X., Yang, H., Deng, W., Liu, W., Wang, G., & Zhou, X. (2023). Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2–3 cm renal stones. International Journal of Urology, 31(3), 281-286.

https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15347

17. Wang, Q., Liu, J., Cao, J., & Ding, J. (2024). Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney stones: A retrospective comparative study. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 12(21), 4483-4490.

https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4483

18. Rao, P., Li, J., Shen, S., & Zhao, H. (2020). A research on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper urinary tract calculi. Int J Clin Exp Med, 13(2), 1115-1122.

https://e-century.us/files/ijcem/13/2/ijcem0104169.pdf

19. Chen, Y., Wen, Y., Yu, Q., Duan, X., Wu, W., & Zeng, G. (2020). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: A meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety. BMC Urology, 20(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4

20. Wang, J., Wang, Y., Yin, J., & Xia, L. (2024). Efficacy of flexible Ureteroscopy lithotripsy and percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the treatment of patients with kidney stones and their impact on inflammatory response and renal function. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, 95(2), 220-226.

https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3175

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Sohail, N., Khan, R. A., Khan, M., Zada, T., Ismail, I., & Khan, M. S. (2025). Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of Single Upper Ureteral Calculi Measuring 1 to 2 cm. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 890-894. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2268