Sustainable Packaging Strategies and Temperature Influence on the Shelf Stability of Chicken Barfi

Authors

  • Hafiz Abdul Munam National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Akhtar Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Umme Hani Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Aqsa Younas National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Kinza Javed Iqbal National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Kashaf Basharat National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Azka Fatima National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Mahey Nadeem National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Noor ul Iman National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Shahnah Qureshi School of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Almas Asghar Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i10.2376

Keywords:

Chicken Barfi, Vacuum Packaging, Microbiological Safety, Sensory Quality, shelf-life Extension

Abstract

Barfi is a popular traditional dessert from the subcontinent, made primarily from milk concentrate and sugar and consumed by people of all ages. To develop a nutritionally dense alternative, chicken meat was mixed with khoa, sugar, butter oil, and coconut, and the shelf life of this newly produced chicken barfi was examined under various packing and storage settings. The aim was to assess physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory changes during storage as well as identify the best packaging for long-term preservation. They were stored at 4 and 30 °C. The samples were placed in vacuum-sealed zipper bags (T₃), cardboard boxes (T₂), plastic boxes (T₁), and metal boxes (T₄). The control was khoa barfi (T0). Proximate analysis showed significant (P<0.05) differences: T₁ had the highest moisture content (33.45±0.33%) and T₃ had the lowest peroxide value (1.37±0.01 meq/kg fat), while T₁ had the best retention of protein and fat (13.79±0.14% and 27.39±0.42%). Microbial counts increased during storage, however vacuum packaging (T₃) significantly inhibited E. coli and Salmonella. Total plate count remained lower in T₁ and T₃ compared to the control. Sensory study revealed a gradual decline in all treatments, although barfi preserved in plastic and vacuum packs still had higher acceptance scores for color, taste, flavor, and overall acceptability despite 40 days of refrigeration. Overall, packaging type and storage temperature significantly influenced the quality and stability of chicken barfi during storage. These results indicate the commercial potential of chicken barfi as a nutritious and consumer-acceptable food with an extended shelf life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Garg, S. R., & Mandokhot, U. V. (1984). Studies on microbial and chemical profile of some Indian sweetmeats and their significance. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 43, 326-333.

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19850405182

GUPTA, V., VIJAYALAKSHMI, N., ASHWINI, B., ANBARASU, K., VIJAYALAKSHMI, G., PRAKASH, M., INDIRAMMA, A., RANGARAO, G., & RAMESH, B. (2010). Shelf life enhancement of coconut BURFI – AN Indian traditional sweet. Journal of Food Quality, 33(3), 329-349.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00312.x

Harker, F. R., Amos, R. L., Echeverríaa, G., & Gunson, F. A. (2006). Influence of texture on taste: Insights gained during studies of hardness, juiciness, and sweetness of Apple fruit. Journal of Food Science, 71(2).

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb08925.x

Jha, A., Kumar, A., Jain, P., Gautam, A. K., & Rasane, P. (2013). Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the shelf life of LAL peda. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(2), 1068-1074.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1064-1

Kamble, K., Kahate, P. A., Chavan, S. D., & Thakare, V. M. (2010). Effect of pine-apple pulp on sensory and chemical properties of burfi. Veterinary world, 3(7), 329.

https://veterinaryworld.org/Vol.3/July/Effect%20of%20Pine-apple%20Pulp%20on%20Sensory%20and%20Chemical%20Properties%20of%20Burfi.pdf

Karthikeyan, N., & Pandiyan, C. (2013). Microbial quality of Khoa and Khoa based milk sweets from different sources. International food research journal, 20(3).

KHAN, M., SEMWAL, A., SHARMA, G., YADAV, D., & SRIHARI, K. (2008). Studies on the development and storage stability of groundnut (ARACHIS HYPOGEA) BURFI. Journal of Food Quality, 31(5), 612-626.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2008.00224.x

Menefee, S., & Overman, O. (1940). A Semimicro-Kjeldahl method for the determination of total nitrogen in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 23(12), 1177-1185.

https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(40)92829-6

Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Navale, A. S., Deshmukh, B. R., Korake, R. L., Narwade, S. G., & Mule, P. R. (2014). Production profile, proximate composition, sensory evaluation and cost configuration of wood apple burfi. The Asian Journal of Animal Science, 8(2), 114-120.

Nicolas, L., Marquilly, C., & O’Mahony, M. (2010). The 9-point hedonic scale: Are words and numbers compatible? Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 1008-1015.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.017

Prijana, C., Mulyana, Y., & Hidayat, B. (2016). Roles of microwave oven in preparing microbiological growth media. Althea Medical Journal, 3(1), 1-5.

https://journal.fk.unpad.ac.id/index.php/amj/article/view/469

Ramanna, B. R., Bhat, K. K., Mahadevaiah, B., Dwarakanath, C. T., Dhanaraj, S., Potty, V. H., & Sen, D. P. (1983). Investigations on large scale preparation and preservation of milk burfi. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 20(2), 67-71.

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19840489339

Reddy, C., Rai, D., & Singh, U. P. (1985). Process modifications for production of khoa-based sweets (M.Tech. thesis). National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.

Ripnar, C. (2015). Formulated nutri-dense barfi and its physico-chemical components. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 3(5), 108-112.

Sakate, R., Bhosale, D., Patange, D., Khedkar, C., & Patil, M. (2004). Optimization of manufacturing technique for wood apple barfi. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 57, 21-25.

Sarkar, K., Ray, P. R., & Ghatak, P. K. (2002). Effect of sodium and potassium metabisulphites on the shelf life of cow milk burfi. Indian journal of dairy science, 55(2), 79-82.

Sawhney, I. K., Patil, G. R., Bikram Kumar, B. K., & Sunita Grover, S. G. (1997). Influence of water activity adjustment on sorption characteristics, acceptability and microbial stability of khoa. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 34, 123-127.

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19970403022

Shete, S. M., Pawar, B. K., Choudhari, D. M., & Kamble, D. K. (2012). Quality of different types of burfi sold in Ahmednagar market. Journal of Dairying Foods & Home Sciences, 31(1), 5-8.

Shrivas, A. A., Pinto, S. V., Patel, S. M., & Balakrishnan, S. (2018). Effect of storage on composition, physico-chemical, rheology, sensory and microbiological quality of Indian cookie Rava Burfi. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 10(1), 88-97.

https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i1.1585

Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A., & Singleton, R. C. (2004). Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice, 23-34.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470385036.ch1c

VIJAYALAKSHMI, N. S., INDIRAMMA, A. R., VISWANATH, P., DATTATREYA, A., & KUMAR, K. R. (2005). Extension of the shelf‐life of BURFI by packaging. Journal of Food Quality, 28(2), 121-136.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2005.00001.x

Wakchaure, S. K. (1998). Studies on preparation of milk sapota pulp barfi (M.Sc. thesis, 120 pp.). Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, India.

WARREN, B. R., YUK, H., & SCHNEIDER, K. R. (2006). Detection of SHIGELLA SONNEI in selected foods by flow‐through IMMUNOCAPTURE followed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction or isolation on MACCONKEY agar. Journal of Rapid Methods & Automation in Microbiology, 14(4), 309-324.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4581.2006.00060.x

Zaheer, K. (2015). An updated review on chicken eggs: Production, consumption, management aspects and nutritional benefits to human health. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 06(13), 1208-1220.

https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2015.613127

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Abdul Munam, H., Muhammad Akhtar, Umme Hani, Younas, A., Iqbal, K. J., Basharat, K., Fatima, A., Nadeem, M., Noor ul Iman, Qureshi, S., & Asghar, A. (2025). Sustainable Packaging Strategies and Temperature Influence on the Shelf Stability of Chicken Barfi. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(10), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i10.2376