Surgical Outcome of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spine Myelopathy in Young VS Elderly Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2409Keywords:
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), Cervical myelopathy, Surgical outcomesAbstract
Objectives: To measure and compare the frequency of surgical outcome of ACDF in patients with cervical spine myelopathy and to compare its outcome in younger vs elderly patients. Study Design and Setting: This Descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan, from February 2025 to June 2025. Methodology: Sixty-two patients, diagnosed cases of CSM, meeting our inclusion criteria were randomly recruited and allocated into younger vs elderly groups based on age. Data were entered on a pre-validated, questionnaire and were followed up post-operatively to check for outcome using the ODOMS criteria, visual analogue scale and rate of complications. Results: n=62 patients underwent ACDF for Cervical myelopathy n=32 elderly and n=30 young patients. Degenerative spondylosis was the most common etiological factor causing CSM in elderly (96.9%) while cervical spine stenosis (50.0%) and traumatic aetiologies (30%) were the causes reported in younger lot. Younger patients had more pronounced motor deficit (30%), spastic gait (26.7%) and higher incidence of severe Ranawat classification iiia/b (50%vs 25%). Pre ope mJOA and VAS didn’t differ significantly (6.9 vs 8.4 and VAS, 9.5 vs 9.3). Elderly patients achieved comparable or better outcomes than their younger counterparts, with favourable ODOMS grade (Excellent/good) 90.6% vs 73.3% with short hospital stay i.e. (8.6 vs 11.2 +- days). Post ope VAS showed a lower trend toward elderly (2.5 vs 3.03) though the difference didn’t reach significance. Complications rate was statistically similar across both groups however respiratory issues were reportedly more common in younger population (16.7% vs 0%). Conclusion: Cervical spine myelopathy is as commonly reported in younger as is, in elderly population though the etiological differences are prominent. Younger patients tend to have traumatic pathologies superimposed on already stenosed C spine. That’s why younger lot though report early, as compared to their elder counterparts, tends to have poor prognosis with long hospital stay, poor VAS and ODOM and more risk of post-operative complications. While the elderly patients with their co morbidities since are dealt with electively they tend to have an overall better surgical outcome. The study concludes overall favourable outcome for elderly population undergoing ACDF for CSM, and would urge to scan the younger lot electively at an early age with regular follow ups and intensive and multimodal care where and when its needed especially when there’s respiratory compromise.
Downloads
References
1. Smith SS, Stewart EM, Davies MB, Kotter NRM. The prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic spinal cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2021, May;11(4):597-607 Epub 2020 Jun 24. PMID: 32677521; PMCID: PMC8119927.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220934496.
2. Kumar V, Raghavan G, Ray, Kumar D, Das, Kumar R. Natural History, Prevalence, and Pathophysiology of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Indian Spine Journal 2(1):p 5-12, Jan–Jun 2019.
https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_48_18
3. Davies BM, Stubbs D, Gillespie CS, Grodzinski B, Venkatesh A, Guilfoyle M, et al. Life expectancy in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy is currently reduced but can be restored with timely treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 May;165(5):1133-1140. Epub 2023 Mar 1. PMID: 36856831; PMCID: PMC10140127.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05515-8.
4. Fei Q, Li J, Su N, Wang B, Li D, Meng H, et all. Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015. 2015 Nov 17;11:1707-18. PMID: 26604771; PMCID: PMC4655946.
https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S94290.
5. Evaniew N, Bailey CS, Rampersaud YR, Jacobs WB, Phan P, Nataraj A, et al. Anterior vs Posterior Surgery for Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. Neurosurgery 2024. Feb 2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38305343.
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002842.
6. Fan, X., Chen, R., Huang, H. et al. Classification and prognostic factors of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgical treatment: a cluster analysis. Sci Rep 2024 Jan 2;14(1):99. PMID: 38167939; PMCID: PMC10762243.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49477-4.
7. Luo, CA., Lim, A.S., Lu, ML. et al. The surgical outcome of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in myelopathic elderly and younger patients. Sci Rep 12, 4495 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08243-8
8. Luo CA, Lim AS, Lu ML, Chiu PY, Lai PL, Niu CC. The surgical outcome of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in myelopathic elderly and younger patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4495. PMID: 35296700; PMCID: PMC8927471.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08243-8.
9. Wang M.C., Kreuter W., Wolfla C.E., Maiman D.J., Deyo R.A. Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 20;34(9):955-61; discussion 962-3. PMID: 19352223.
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2fd5.
10. Chotai S., Parker S.L., Sielatycki J.A., et al. Impact of old age on patient-report outcomes and cost utility for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):1236–1245.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4835-3.
11. Scerrati A., Germano’ A., Montano N., et al. Factors affecting functional outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a multicenter study. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine. 2021;12(2):144–148. Epub 2021 Jun 10. PMID: 34194160; PMCID: PMC8214232.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_1_21.
12. Lawless MH, Tong D, Claus CF, Hanson C, Li C, Houseman CM, Bono P, Richards BF, Kelkar PS, Abdulhak MM, Chang V, Carr DA, Park P, Soo TM. Age as a Risk Factor for Complications Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Analysis From the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):343-351. PMID: 34392275.
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004200.
13. Hartman TJ, Nie JW, Pawlowski H, Prabhu MC, Vanjani NN, Singh K. Impact of age within younger populations on outcomes following cervical surgery in the ambulatory setting. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Sep 16;34:102016. PMID: 36164388; PMCID: PMC9508464.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102016.
14. Terashima Y, Yurube T, Sumi M, Kanemura A, Uno K, Kakutani K. Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Young Adults: A Retrospective Case Series of Patients under Age 30. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 10;59(3):539. PMID: 36984540; PMCID: PMC10058945.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030539.
15. Croci D.M., Sherrod B., Alvi M.A., et al. Differences in postoperative quality of life in young, early elderly, and late elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Published online March. 2022;11:1–11.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211157.
16. Tang J, Gal JS, Geng E, Duey A, Ferriter P, Sicard R, Zaidat B, Girdler S, Rhee H, Zapolsky I, Al-Attar P, Markowitz J, Kim J, Cho S. An 11-Year-Long Analysis of the Risks Associated With Age in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in a Large, Urban Academic Hospital. Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):615-620. Epub 2023 Sep 13. PMID: 37703497; PMCID: PMC11877560
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231202579.
17. Lenga, P., Gülec, G., Kiening, K., Unterberg, A. W, Ishak, B. (2022). Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up. Brain and Spine, 3, 102683.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683
18. Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, Reeves BC, Freedman IG, David WB, Ehresman J et al, Octogenarians are independently associated withextended LOS and Non Routine discharge after elective ACDF for CSM. Global Spine J. 2022 oct;12(8):1792-1803, Epub 2021 Jan 29. PMID:33511889; PMCID:PMC9609534
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.