Comparative Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Posterior Urethral Valves in Infants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2443Keywords:
Posterior Urethral Valves (PUV), Early Surgery, Delayed Surgery, Renal Function, Bladder Dysfunction, Paediatric Urology, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).Abstract
Background: The most frequent cause of congenital lower urinary tract obstruction in male babies is posterior urethral valves (PUV), which frequently leads to bladder and kidney failure. Because different results regarding renal recovery and postoperative problems have been described in the literature, there is ongoing discussion regarding the best time to perform surgical correction: early in the newborn period or after stability. Objective: To compare the outcomes of early versus delayed surgical intervention in infants with PUV, focusing on renal function improvement, complication rates, urinary tract infection (UTI) recurrence, and long-term bladder function. Methods: A qualitative comparative observational study was conducted over one year at a tertiary care hospital in Quetta, Pakistan. A total of 120 male infants diagnosed with PUV (confirmed by cystoscopy or VCUG) were divided into two groups Early surgery group (n=60): underwent valve ablation or urinary diversion within the neonatal period (≤1 month). Delayed surgery group (n=60): had surgery more than a month following stabilization.
Semi-structured interviews with children surgeons, urologists, and caretakers were used to gather information about bladder outcomes, renal improvement, postoperative recovery, and UTI recurrence. Prior to the start of the trial, informed permission and ethical approval were acquired. Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Higher eGFR improvement (68% vs. 55%) and lower mean serum creatinine (0.9 ± 0.3 mg/dL vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL) were indicators of greater renal function recovery in the early intervention group. The early group experienced CKD development less frequently (16.6% vs. 28.3%). Additionally, there was a decrease in UTIs and postoperative readmissions (20% and 13.3% in early instances versus 33% and 23.3% in delayed cases). In 75% of early instances, normal voiding was attained, whereas in 60% of delayed cases, and recovery satisfaction as stated by caregivers was higher (90% vs. 77%). Conclusion: Compared to delayed surgery, early surgical intervention in babies with PUV leads to greater bladder function, less comorbidities, and superior renal outcomes. In newborns, early valve ablation presents considerable long-term advantages despite technical difficulties. To maintain kidney function and improve overall prognosis, prompt diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial.
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal. (1999). Urethral valves. BJU International, 84(5), 570-578.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00307.x
2. Yohannes, P., & Hanna, M. (2002). Current trends in the management of posterior urethral valves in the pediatric population. Urology, 60(6), 947-953.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01621-7
3. Hodges, S. J., Patel, B., McLorie, G., & Atala, A. (2009). Posterior urethral valves. The Scientific World JOURNAL, 9, 1119-1126.
https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.127
4. Dinneen, M., & Duffy, P. (1996). Posterior urethral valves. British Journal of Urology, 78(2), 275-281.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.10324.x
5. Smith, J. M., Stablein, D. M., Munoz, R., Hebert, D., & McDonald, R. A. (2007). Contributions of the transplant registry: The 2006 annual report of the North American pediatric renal trials and collaborative studies (NAPRTCS)*. Pediatric Transplantation, 11(4), 366-373.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00704.x
6. Roth, K. S., Carter, W. H., & Chan, J. C. (2001). Obstructive nephropathy in children: Long-term progression after relief of posterior urethral valve. Pediatrics, 107(5), 1004-1010.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.5.1004
7. Heikkilä, J., Holmberg, C., Kyllönen, L., Rintala, R., & Taskinen, S. (2011). Long-term risk of end stage renal disease in patients with posterior urethral valves. Journal of Urology, 186(6), 2392-2396.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.109
8. EL-GHONEIMI, A., DESGRIPPES, A., LUTON, D., MACHER, M., GUIBOURDENCHE, J., GAREL, C., MULLER, F., VUILLARD, E., LOTTMANN, H., NESSMANN, C., OURY, J., & AIGRAIN, Y. (1999). Outcome of posterior urethral valves: To what extent is it improved by prenatal diagnosis? Journal of Urology, 162(3 Part 1), 849-853.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199909010-00076
9. Biard, J., Johnson, M. P., Carr, M. C., Wilson, R. D., Hedrick, H. L., Pavlock, C., & Adzick, N. S. (2005). Long-term outcomes in children treated by prenatal Vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106(3), 503-508.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000171117.38929.eb
10. Dewan, P., A, Goh, D., W, & Stephens, F. D. (1992). Pathophysiology and management of posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Surg Int, 7(2), 93–102.
11. Kajbafzadeh, A., Payabvash, S., & Karimian, G. (2007). Urodynamic changes in patients with anterior urethral valves: Before and after endoscopic valve ablation. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 3(4), 295-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.11.002
12. Ansari, M., Singh, P., Mandhani, A., Dubey, D., Srivastava, A., Kapoor, R., & Kumar, A. (2008). Delayed presentation in posterior urethral valve: Long-term implications and outcome. Urology, 71(2), 230-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.037
13. Smith, G. H., Canning, D. A., Schulman, S. L., Snyder, H. M., & Duckett, J. W. (1996). The long-term outcome of posterior urethral valves treated with primary valve ablation and observation. The Journal of Urology, 1730-1734.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199605000-00065
14. Bingham, G., Leslie, S. W., & Rentea, R. M. (2024). Posterior urethral valves. In StatPearls [internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
15. Lebowitz, R. L., Olbing, H., Parkkulainen, K. V., Smellie, J. M., & Tamminen-Möbius, T. E. (1985). International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatric Radiology, 15(2), 105-109.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02388714
16. GLASSBERG, K. I. (2002). Normal and abnormal development of the kidney: A clinician’s interpretation of current knowledge. Journal of Urology, 167(6), 2339-2350.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64982-8
17. Coquillette, M., Lee, R. S., Pagni, S. E., Cataltepe, S., & Stein, D. R. (2019). Renal outcomes of neonates with early presentation of posterior urethral valves: A 10-year single center experience. Journal of Perinatology, 40(1), 112-117.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0489-4
18. Caione, P., & Nappo, S. G. (2011). Posterior urethral valves: long-term outcome. Pediatric surgery international, 27(10), 1027-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2946-9
19. Karmarkar, S. J. (2001). Long-term results of surgery for posterior urethral valves: A review. Pediatric Surgery International, 17(1), 8-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830000481
20. Caione, P., & Nappo, S. G. (2011). Posterior urethral valves: Long-term outcome. Pediatric Surgery International, 27(10), 1027-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2946-9
21. Robinson, C. H., Rickard, M., Jeyakumar, N., Smith, G., Richter, J., Van Mieghem, T., Dos Santos, J., Chanchlani, R., & Lorenzo, A. J. (2024). Long-term kidney outcomes in children with posterior urethral valves. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 35(12), 1715-1725.
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000000000468
22. Klaus, R., & Lange-Sperandio, B. (2022). Chronic kidney disease in boys with posterior urethral valves–pathogenesis, prognosis and management. Biomedicines, 10(8), 1894.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081894
23. Kim, S. J., Jung, J., Lee, C., Park, S., Song, S. H., Won, H., & Kim, K. S. (2018). Long-term outcomes of kidney and bladder function in patients with a posterior urethral valve. Medicine, 97(23), e11033.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000011033
24. Prathap, S., & Narayanan, S. K. (2022). Does early upper tract diversion and delayed Undiversion in Megaureters secondary to severe posterior urethral valves lead to better renal outcomes? Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 27(2), 196-203.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_366_20
25. Khondker, A., Chan, J. Y., Malik, S., Kim, J. K., Chua, M. E., Henderson, B., Yadav, P., Santos, J. D., Brownrigg, N., Viteri, B., Tasian, G. E., Rickard, M., & Lorenzo, A. J. (2023). Primary ablation versus urinary diversion in posterior urethral valve: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 19(4), 408-417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.008
26. Bingham, G., & Rentea, R. M. (2020). Posterior Urethral Valve. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560881/
27. Kibar, Y., Ashley, R. A., Roth, C. C., Frimberger, D., & Kropp, B. P. (2011). Timing of posterior urethral valve diagnosis and its impact on clinical outcome. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 7(5), 538-542.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.