Comparing Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Talat Zafar; Tariq Masood; Ammar Farooq; Subhana Batool; Usman Ghani

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2456

Authors

Talat Zafar Department of Medicine, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan
Tariq Masood Department of Medicine, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Medical College, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan
Ammar Farooq Department of Medicine, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan
Subhana Batool Department of Medicine, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan
Usman Ghani Department of Medicine, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2456

Keywords:

Gestational diabetes mellitus, Pregestational diabetes, Preterm labour, Postpartum haemorrhage, Neonatal outcomes, Azad Jammu & Kashmir

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy, encompassing both pregestational (PGDM) and gestational (GDM) forms, is a major contributor to maternal and neonatal morbidity worldwide. In low-resource settings such as Azad Jammu & Kashmir, inadequate screening and limited preconception care exacerbate these risks. Comparative data on fetomaternal outcomes between PGDM and GDM in this region remain scarce. Objective: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes among women with PGDM and GDM delivering at District Headquarters (DHQ) Hospital, Mirpur, Azad Jammu & Kashmir. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 276 diabetic pregnant women (138 PGDM and 138 GDM) who delivered at DHQ Hospital between December 2023 and June 2024. Maternal outcomes assessed were preterm labour, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), and postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); fetal outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, low birth weight (LBW), stillbirth, and congenital anomalies. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0. Chi-square tests compared proportions, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Stratified analyses were performed for maternal age, gestational age, mode of delivery, and residential status. Results: The mean maternal age was 27.6 ± 7.1 years, and mean gestational age at delivery was 34.4 ± 4.1 weeks. Preterm labour (26.8% vs 15.2%; p = 0.018) and PPH (10.9% vs 2.9%; p = 0.009) were significantly higher among GDM patients, whereas NICU admissions were more frequent in PGDM (47.8% vs 37.0%; p = 0.068). No significant differences were found for PIH, LBW, stillbirth, or congenital anomalies. Stratified analysis showed that the excess risks of preterm labour and PPH in GDM were pronounced in older mothers (>25 years), term pregnancies, vaginal deliveries, and urban residents, while NICU admission was significantly higher in PGDM among younger mothers (≤25 years) and preterm births. Conclusion: GDM and PGDM are both linked to serious problems throughout pregnancy and after birth. GDM was associated with enhanced risks of preterm labor and postpartum hemorrhage, whereas PGDM was connected to higher newborn morbidity. These findings underscore the significance of early screening, good glycemic management, and multidisciplinary care in all diabetic pregnancies to reduce unfavorable fetomaternal outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Malaza N, Masete M, Adam S, Dias S, Nyawo T, Pheiffer C. A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10846.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710846

2. Saravanan P; Diabetes in Pregnancy Working Group; Maternal Medicine Clinical Study Group; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, UK. Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):793-800.

3. Egan AM, Dow ML, Vella A. A Review of the Pathophysiology and Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(12):2734-2746.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.02.019

4. Harrison J, Melov S, Kirby AC, Athayde N, Boghossian A, Cheung W, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e065063.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063

5. Wang X, Zhang X, Zhou M, Juan J, Wang X. Association of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Its Interaction with Maternal Age in Chinese Urban Women. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:5516937.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-136722/v1

6. Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, Liu Z, Liu F. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;377:e067946.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946

7. Chatzakis C, Eleftheriades A, Demertzidou E, Dinas K, Vlahos N, Sotiriadis A, Eleftheriades M. Pregnancy outcomes in the different phenotypes of gestational diabetes mellitus based on the oral glucose tolerance test. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023;204:110913.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110913

8. Oros Ruiz M, Perejón López D, Serna Arnaiz C, Siscart Viladegut J, Àngel Baldó J, Sol J. Maternal and foetal complications of pregestational and gestational diabetes: a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 19;14(1):9017. PMID: 38641705; PMCID: PMC11031602.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59465-x.

9. Clement NS, Abul A, Farrelly R, Murphy HR, Forbes K, Simpson NAB, Scott EM. Pregnancy outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;232(4):354-366. Epub 2024 Dec 9. PMID: 39662865.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.026.

10. Koivunen S, Viljakainen M, Männistö T, Gissler M, Pouta A, Kaaja R, Eriksson J, Laivuori H, Kajantie E, Vääräsmäki M. Pregnancy outcomes according to the definition of gestational diabetes. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0229496. PMID: 32134959; PMCID: PMC7058278.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229496.

11. Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, Liu Z, Liu F. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022 May 25;377:e067946. PMID: 35613728; PMCID: PMC9131781.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946.

12. Hufnagel A, Dearden L, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Ozanne SE. Programming of cardiometabolic health: the role of maternal and fetal hyperinsulinaemia. J Endocrinol. 2022 Apr 5;253(2):R47-R63. PMID: 35258482; PMCID: PMC9066586.

https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-21-0332.

13. Alia A, Ahmad R, Husain M, Chaudry B. Feto-Maternal Complications in Gestational Diabetes and in Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus. Med Forum. 2020;31(4):45-9.

14. El Mallah KO, Narchi H, Kulaylat NA, Shaban MS. Gestational and pre-gestational diabetes: comparison of maternal and fetal characteristics and outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;58(3):203-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00084-2

15. Sugiyama T, Saito M, Nishigori H, Nagase S, Yaegashi N, Sagawa N, et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes and overt diabetes first diagnosed in pregnancy: a retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(1):20-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.020

16. Fatema K, Sultana N, Noor F. Characteristics of Pre-gestational and Gestational Diabetes: A Comparison of Maternal and Fetal Outcome. Sch Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2(12):319-26.

17. Oxman R, Roe AH, Ullal J, Putman MS. Gestational and pregestational diabetes in pregnant women with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2022;27:100289.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2021.100289

18. Dixit M, Kapadia SN, Parmar KG. Pregnancy with diabetes: The study of fetomaternal outcome in a tertiary care teaching centre in western India. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2023;10(1):12-6.

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.003

19. Sinha S, Mayadeo NM. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed either by oral glucose tolerance test or diabetes in pregnancy study group India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(10):4526-33.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174436

20. Driessen M, Bouvier-Colle MH, Dupont C, Khoshnood B, Rudigoz RC, Deneux-Tharaux C; Pithagore6 Group. Postpartum hemorrhage resulting from uterine atony after vaginal delivery: factors associated with severity. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):21-31. PMID: 21173641; PMCID: PMC3319503.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318202c845.

21. Pubu ZM, Bianba ZM, Yang G, CyRen LM, Pubu DJ, Suo Lang KZ, Zhen B, Zhaxi QZ, Nyma ZG. Factors Affecting the Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Pregnant Women in Tibet Health Facilities. Med Sci Monit. 2021 Feb 13;27:e928568. PMID: 33579890; PMCID: PMC7887994.

https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.928568.

22. Hillick D, O'Reilly D, Murphy L, Breathnach F, McCallion N. Increased risk of admission to neonatal intensive care unit in neonates born to mothers with pregestational diabetes. Eur J Pediatr. 2025 May 22;184(6):354. PMID: 40402196; PMCID: PMC12098415

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06170-0.