Post Operative Complications of Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

Authors

  • Hazrat Abu Bakar Saddiqe Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ata Ullah Arif Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ahmed Zaman Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Farhan Aslam Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Fawad Ullah Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Sahibzada Saad ur Rehman Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2548

Keywords:

Emergency laparotomy, Ileal perforation, Peristomal excoriation, Postoperative complications, Surgical site infection, Wound dehiscence

Abstract

Background: Intestinal perforation is still a serious surgical emergency and can be caused by enteric fever, intestinal tuberculosis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Subsequent leakage into the peritoneal space causes peritonitis, sepsis, and considerable mortality if not attended to immediately. Emergency laparotomy is still considered a lifesaving intervention, but postoperative sequelae still pose considerable morbidity, especially in limited settings such as Peshawar. Objective: To find out the frequency of post-operative complications of non-traumatic ileal perforation in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at our health setup. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration and Place of Study: Conducted from December 2024 to May 2025 in the Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Methodology: A total of 133 patients aged 18–40 years with confirmed non-traumatic ileal perforation were included through consecutive sampling. All underwent emergency laparotomy and were observed for complications including wound infection, peristomal excoriation, wound dehiscence, prolonged ileus, and fistula formation for up to 45 days post-surgery. Results: The mean age was 28.36 ± 6.73 years with 62.4% males. Enteric fever accounted for 62.4% of perforations, followed by tuberculosis (26.3%) and adhesions (11.3%). Wound infection occurred in 31.6%, peristomal excoriation in 17.3%, wound dehiscence in 10.5%, and prolonged ileus and fistula formation each in 3% of patients. Conclusion: Postoperative complications following emergency laparotomy for non-traumatic ileal perforation are common, with wound infection being the predominant issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ashok E, Ekka NM, Sinha DK, Gaurav K, Kumar B, Ahmad N, et al. Clinical presentations, treatments, and complications of ileal perforation at a tertiary center: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e72027.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72027

2. Weledji EP. Common peritoneal disorders: what the physician should know. Prz Gastroenterol. 2023;18(4):373-379.

https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2023.133071

3. Panday B, Bhatta OP, Gyawali P, Dangol RS, Joshi MD, Neupane BR. Ileal perforation peritonitis secondary to accidental ingestion of a chicken bone: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 123:110284.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110284

4. Shrestha BM, Shrestha S, Kharel S, KC A, Shrestha S, Pradhan S, et al. Ileal perforation as an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021; 87:106409.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106409

5. Xu Y, Fang W, Chen Z, Tang S. Bowel perforation caused by foreign body ingestion presenting as intestinal obstruction: a case report highlighting the importance of early diagnosis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(8):5205-5208.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003288

6. Das S, Prakash S, Sunil J, Shaikh O, Balasubramanian G. A rare phenomenon of stercoral ileal perforation in a pregnant woman. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41529.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41529

7. Gandhi JA, Shinde PH, Churiwala JJ, Husain S. Tubular ileal duplication causing perforative peritonitis in an adult: a rare presentation. Surg J (N Y). 2021;7(1):e14-e17.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722180

8. Harvitkar RU, Gattupalli GB, Najmu S, Joshi A. Emergency laparoscopic management of perforative peritonitis: a retrospective study. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20121.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20121

9. Sobocki J, Pędziwiatr M, Bigda J, Hołówko W, Major P, Mitura K, et al. The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part I. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023;18(2):187-212.

https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.127877

10. Wada Z, Sheshe AA, Na'aya HU, Ibrahim SE, Mohammed Y. Ileostomy versus primary closure in typhoid ileal perforation in patients with two or more poor prognostic factors. Niger Med J. 2025;66(2):468-479.

https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v66i2.598

11. Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, Anderson ID, Bang Foss N, Cooper Z, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations: part 1-preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg. 2021;45(5):1272-1290.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9

12. Verma H, Pandey S, Sheoran KD, Marwah S. Surgical audit of patients with ileal perforations requiring ileostomy in a tertiary care hospital in India. Surg Res Pract. 2015; 2015:351548.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/351548

13. Mohil RS, Singh T, Arya S, Bhatnagar D. Risk adjustment is crucial in comparing outcomes of various surgical modalities in patients with ileal perforation. Patient Saf Surg. 2008;2(1):31.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-2-31

14. Khalid S, Bhatti AA. Non-traumatic spontaneous ileal perforation: experience with 125 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(4):526-529.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac268.030

15. Siddiqui FG, Shaikh JM, Soomro AG, Bux K, Memon AS, Ali SA. Outcome of ileostomy in the management of ileal perforation. JLUMHS. 2008;7(3):168-173.

https://doi.org/10.22442/jlumhs.08730169

16. Chauhan S, Sharma H, Chauhan B. Assessment of post-operative complications in emergency abdominal surgery in a tertiary care centre. Sch J App Med Sci. 2017;5(4E):1581-1587.

https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2017.v05i04.068

17. Chaudhary SH, Hafeez MR, Hafeez S. Postoperative complications in emergency laparotomies at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2013;7(4):897-900.

18. Murtaza B, Saeed S, Sharif MA. Postoperative complications in emergency versus elective laparotomies at a peripheral hospital. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(3):42-45.

19. Anwar F, Ullah JS, Maqbool A, Umer W, Khan WA, Bashir S. Assessing postoperative complications in emergency bowel resection and anastomosis. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2025;75(3):578-582. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i3.11709

20. Nazir MT, Anjum IH, Kharl RAK, Mengal MZ. Post-operative complications frequency in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in tertiary care hospital. Biol Clin Sci Res J. 2024;1464.

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1464

21. Manoj P, Shashikumar HB, Gangamma K. Post-operative complication rates in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in tertiary care hospital. Asian J Med Sci. 2022;13(4):177-180. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i4.41152

22. Begum M, Majid MA, Joarder RH, Rahman M, Debnath BC, Begum W. Post-operative complications of ileal perforation: experience of 100 patients in Bangladesh. J Curr Adv Med Res. 2016;3(1):2-5.

https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v3i1.29354

23. Rajper NU, Ghansham, Panhwar W, Rashid K, Hyder Z. Early postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparotomy and ileostomy for ileal perforation. J Surg Pak (Int). 2018;23(2):68-71.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Saddiqe, H. A. B., Arif, A. U., Zaman, A., Aslam, F., Fawad Ullah, & Sahibzada Saad ur Rehman. (2025). Post Operative Complications of Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 1275-1280. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2548