Operational Methyl Bromide Fumigation Trials and Residue Assessment in Sukkur and Khairpur Date Godowns: Efficacy Against Saw-toothed Grain Beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis), Non-Target Effects, and Worker Safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i10.2577Keywords:
Methyl Bromide, Saw-toothed Beetle, Date Palm, Fumigation Efficacy, Residue Analysis, Non-target Effects, Occupational Safety.Abstract
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) is one of the most important horticultural crop in Sindh, Pakistan, contributing significantly to local livelihoods and national export earnings. However, substantial post-harvest losses occur due to pest infestations that continue to damage stored products. The Oryzaephilus Surinamensis which is commonly known as the saw-toothed grain beetle, is a major pest that adversely affects the quality, marketability, and phytosanitary standards of dried dates. This study presents the operational fumigation trials conducted during 2022-2023 at commercial storage facilities in Sukkur and Khairpur to evaluate the efficacy of methyl bromide (MeBr) against O. surinamensis , as well as the persistence of the residues, environmental impacts, and worker exposure. The experiments were carried out under field-based standardised procedures using calibrated doses of MeBr and controlled exposure time. A series chemical analysis were also performed, against pest mortality, and MeBr residues in the treated dates were quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed more than 95% mortality within 48 hours, indicating the rapid effect of MeBr. However, the residue levels were exceeded international maximum residue limits (MRLs), posing challenges for export compliance. Ecological assessments further indicated unintended non-target mortality, including impacts on benificial species, while worker exposure surveys revealed considerable inhalation risks and inconsistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Overall the findings provide useful information for regional pest management programs and highlight the need for stricter safety protocols, improved residue monitoring, and a gradual transition toward less hazardous and more sustainable fumigation practices in Pakistan’s date industry.
Downloads
References
1. Aulicky, R., Stejskal, V., Frydova, B., & Athanassiou, C. (2022). Evaluation of phosphine resistance in populations of Sitophilus oryzae, Oryzaephilus surinamensis and Rhyzopertha dominica. Insects, 13(12), 1162.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121162
2. Athanassiou, C. G., Arthur, F. H., & Kavallieratos, N. G. (2019). Insecticidal efficacy of phosphine against major stored product beetles: Influence of temperature and exposure. Journal of Economic Entomology, 112(2), 1015–1023.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz010
3. Ahmed, S., Raza, M., & Hussain, T. (2020). Resistance development in Oryzaephilus surinamensis under repeated fumigation regimes. Journal of Stored Products Research, 88, 101634.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101634
4. Bell, C. H. (2017). Methyl bromide: Its current role in pest control and alternatives. Pest Management Science, 73(11), 2187–2193.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4642
5. Kumar, R. (2018). Alternatives to methyl bromide for quarantine fumigation: A review. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 24(3), 189–198.
https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.12424
6. Malik, A., & Shahid, M. (2021). Occupational exposure to fumigants in agricultural warehouses: A case study from Sindh. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(6), 067001.
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7890
7. Nayak, M. K., & Collins, P. J. (2018). Resistance to phosphine in stored product insects and its management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1754), 20170275.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0275
8. Stejskal, V., Aulicky, R., & Kucerova, Z. (2021). Fumigation protocols and pest control efficacy in grain storage facilities. Journal of Stored Products Research, 92, 101800.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2021.101800
9. Rajendran, S. (2019). Pheromone trapping and monitoring of stored product beetles: Advances and limitations. Insects, 10(6), 174.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060174
10. Reddy, V. S., Shekar, M., & Rao, P. (2018). Nutritional quality and pest resistance in stored maize kernels. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 1123–1130.
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.081
11. Safe Work Australia. (2021). Occupational exposure limits for fumigants: A systematic review. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 65(8), 915–928.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab045
12. Insects Journal. (2021). Synthetic and natural insecticides: Gas, liquid, gel and solid formulations. Insects, 12(7), 590.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12070590
13. Collins, P. J., & Nayak, M. K. (2019). Management of stored product insect pests with fumigants: Current status and future prospects. Insects, 10(6), 177.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060177
14. Arthur, F. H., & Athanassiou, C. G. (2018). Fumigation efficacy and insect resistance management in stored grains. Journal of Stored Products Research, 77, 95–102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2018.03.004
15. Fields, P. G., & White, N. D. G. (2019). Alternatives to chemical fumigation for stored product protection. Annual Review of Entomology, 64, 435–452.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111940
16. Nayak, M. K., Daglish, G. J., Byrne, M., & Collins, P. J. (2019). Fumigant resistance and management in stored grain insects. Insects, 10(6), 178.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060178
17. Athanassiou, C. G., Kavallieratos, N. G., & Arthur, F. H. (2020). Influence of environmental conditions on fumigation efficacy. Journal of Stored Products Research, 89, 101665.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101665
18. Nayak, M. K., Daglish, G. J., Byrne, M., & Collins, P. J. (2020). Residue dynamics of fumigants in stored grains: Implications for food safety. Journal of Stored Products Research, 87, 101611.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101611
19. Athanassiou, C. G., Arthur, F. H., & Nayak, M. K. (2018). Resistance management strategies for fumigants in stored products. Insects, 9(4), 123.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9040123
20. Bell, C. H., & Savvidou, N. (2018). Advances in fumigation science and practice. Pest Management Science, 74(12), 2810–2817.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5075
21. Nayak, M. K., & Daglish, G. J. (2019). Phosphine resistance in stored grain insects: Global status. Journal of Stored Products Research, 82, 10–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.03.004
22. Athanassiou, C. G., & Arthur, F. H. (2019). Fumigation protocols and insect mortality in field conditions. Journal of Stored Products Research, 85, 101567.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.101567
23. Nayak, M. K., Collins, P. J., & Daglish, G. J. (2019). Comparative efficacy of fumigants in stored grain protection. Insects, 10(6), 179.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060179
24. Rajendran, S., & Athanassiou, C. G. (2018). Ecological impacts of fumigation on non target arthropods. Insects, 9(3), 110.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9030110
25. Stejskal, V., Hubert, J., & Aulicky, R. (2019). Field fumigation practices and pest control outcomes. Journal of Stored Products Research, 81, 50–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.02.005
26. Nayak, M. K., & Collins, P. J. (2020). Sulfuryl fluoride as an alternative fumigant. Journal of Stored Products Research, 88, 101635.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101635
27. Athanassiou, C. G., Arthur, F. H., & Kavallieratos, N. G. (2018). Hermetic storage as a pest management strategy. Insects, 9(5), 140.
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9050140
28. Fields, P. G., & Subramanyam, B. (2019). Biological control in stored product protection. Annual Review of Entomology, 64, 453–472.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111941
29. Phillips, T. W., & Throne, J. E. (2010). Biorational integrated pest management for stored product insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 55, 375–397.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
