Comparison of Outcome of Open and Endoscopic Surgical Excision of Stage I and II Angiofibroma

Authors

  • Rida Nawazish ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Syeda Hina Shamim ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Mehak Saif ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Mahnoor Fatima ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Aamer Ayub Awan ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Maqsood Ahmed ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2692

Keywords:

Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma; Endoscopic surgery; Open surgery; Fisch classification; Recurrence; Blood loss

Abstract

Background and aim: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma is a highly vascular tumor in which surgical excision remains the primary treatment. Endoscopic surgery has expanded for early-stage disease, yet comparative outcomes with open techniques remain clinically relevant. This trial compared open versus endoscopic excision for Fisch stage I and II angiofibroma in terms of recurrence, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirement, and hospital stay. Material and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from 10 March 2025 to 20 June 2025. Sixty patients aged 10 to 25 years with Fisch stage I or II disease were randomized by lottery method to open excision (n = 30) or endoscopic excision (n = 30). Completeness of excision was assessed on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at day 7, and recurrence was assessed at 3 months. Data were analyzed using independent t-test and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, with post-stratification Chi-square analysis for age, stage, and smoking status. Results: Mean age was 15.8 ± 3.3 years in the open group and 16.1 ± 3.4 years in the endoscopic group (p = 0.728). Mean operative duration was 248.6 ± 36.9 versus 156.4 ± 32.1 minutes (p < 0.001). Mean blood loss was 945 ± 310 versus 512 ± 185 mL (p < 0.001). Transfusion was required in 13 (43.3%) versus 2 (6.7%) patients (p = 0.001). Hospital stay was 5.2 ± 1.3 versus 3.4 ± 0.9 days (p < 0.001). Complete excision on day 7 magnetic resonance imaging was 27 (90.0%) versus 29 (96.7%) (p = 0.301). Recurrence at 3 months occurred in 8 (26.7%) versus 2 (6.7%) patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Endoscopic excision yielded superior perioperative outcomes with reduced early recurrence while maintaining comparable completeness of resection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tiwari PK, Teron P, Saikia N, Saikia HP, Bhuyan UT, Das D: Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Rise in Incidence. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016, 68:141–8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0898-4

2. Midilli R, Karci B, Akyildiz S: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Analysis of 42 cases and important aspects of endoscopic approach. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 73:401–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.11.005

3. Yiotakis I, Eleftheriadou A, Davilis D, Giotakis E, Ferekidou E, Korres S, Kandiloros D: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma stages I and II: A comparative study of surgical approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 72:793–800.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.007

4. Reyes C, Bentley H, Gelves JA, Solares CA, Byrd JK: Recurrence Rate after Endoscopic vsOpen Approaches for Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Meta-analysis. J Neurol Surgery, Part B Skull Base. 2019, 80:577–85.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676562

5. Oliveira JAA, Tavares MG, Aguiar CV, de Azevedo JF, Sousa JRF, de Almeida PC, Gomes EF: Comparison between endoscopic and open surgery in 37 patients with nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 78:75–80.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000100012

6. Godoy MDCL, Bezerra TFP, Pinna F de R, Voegels RL: Complications in the endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted treatment of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with intracranial extension. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 80:120–5.

https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140026

7. Oliveira JAA, Tavares MG, Aguiar CV, de Azevedo JF, Sousa JRF, de Almeida PC, Gomes EF: Comparison between endoscopic and open surgery in 37 patients with nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 78:75–80.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000100012

8. Huang Y, Liu Z, Wang J, Sun X, Yang L, Wang D: Surgical management of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Analysis of 162 cases from 1995 to 2012. Laryngoscope. 2014, 124:1942–6.

https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24522

9. Hyun DW, Ryu JH, Kim YS, Kim KB, Kim WS, Kim CH, Yoon JH: Treatment outcomes of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma according to surgical approach. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011, 75:69–73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.10.010

10. Bleier BS, Kennedy DW, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, Bloom JD, O’Malley BW: Current management of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: A tertiary center experience 1999-2007. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009, 23:328–30.

https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3322

11. Boghani Z, Husain Q, Kanumuri V V., Khan MN, Sangvhi S, Liu JK, Eloy JA: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: A systematic review and comparison of endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted, and open resection in 1047 cases. Laryngoscope. 2013, 123:859–69.

https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23843

12. Pryor SG, Moore EJ, Kasperbauer JL: Endoscopic versus traditional approaches for excision of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Laryngoscope. 2005, 115:1201–7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000162655.96247.66

13. Kopeć T, Borucki Ł, Szyfter W: Fully endoscopic resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma - Own experience and clinical outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 78:1015–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.03.027

14. Andrade NA, Pinto JA, de Oliveira Nóbrega M, Aguiar JEP, Aguiar TFAP, Vinhaes ÉSA: Exclusively endoscopic surgery for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2007, 137:492–6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.03.003

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Nawazish, R., Shamim, S. H., Saif, M., Fatima, M., Awan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Comparison of Outcome of Open and Endoscopic Surgical Excision of Stage I and II Angiofibroma. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 1384-1388. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2692