Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Perianal Fistula Tract Using Operative Findings as the Gold StandardDiagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Perianal Fistula Tract Using Operative Findings as the Gold Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2709Keywords:
Perianal Fistula, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diagnostic Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity.Abstract
Background: Perianal fistula is a chronic inflammatory condition that causes pain, discharge, and recurrent sepsis. Accurate preoperative delineation of fistula anatomy is essential for appropriate surgical management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high-resolution assessment of the perianal region; however, its diagnostic accuracy requires evaluation against operative findings. Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying perianal fistula tracts using intraoperative findings as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, over six months June 2024 to December 2024 after ethical approval. Non probability consecutive sampling was used to enroll 150 patients aged 18 to 70 years with clinical suspicion of perianal fistula. MRI was performed on a 3.0 Tesla scanner using non enhanced T1 weighted and T2 weighted sequences. Images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist and correlated with intraoperative findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using a 2×2 table. Results: The mean age was 38.4 ± 11.2 years, and mean weight was 72.6 ± 9.8 kg. There were 98 males (65.3%) and 52 females (34.7%). MRI identified fistula in 128 patients (85.3%), while operative findings confirmed fistula in 132 patients (88.0%). True positives were 116, false positives 12, false negatives 16, and true negatives 6. Sensitivity was 87.9% (95% CI: 81.2%–92.8%), specificity 33.3% (95% CI: 13.3%–59.0%), positive predictive value 90.6% (95% CI: 84.3%–95.0%), negative predictive value 27.3% (95% CI: 10.7%–50.2%), and diagnostic accuracy 81.3% (95% CI: 74.1%–87.3%). Conclusion: MRI demonstrated high sensitivity and positive predictive value for perianal fistula detection, supporting its role in preoperative evaluation, while limited specificity indicated the need for operative correlation.
Downloads
References
1. Shahid, M., Ahmed, Z., & Malik, S. (2017). Management of low anal fistula: fistulectomy alone versus fistulectomy with primary closure. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, (2), 203.
2. Ali, H., Azmat, U., Kumar, M., & Abid, K. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of Perianal fistula keeping surgical findings as gold standard. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 181-184.
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.314
3. Algazzar, H. Y., Eldib, D. B., Bahram, M. A., & Zaher, N. A. (2019). Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula evaluation and its impact on surgical outcome. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-019-0085-9
4. Singh, K. (2014). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of Perianal fistulae with surgical correlation. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH.
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/7328.4417
5. Beets-Tan, R. G., Beets, G. L., Van der Hoop, A. G., Kessels, A. G., Vliegen, R. F., Baeten, C. G., & Van Engelshoven, J. M. (2001). Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology, 218(1), 75-84.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01dc0575
6. Al-Khawari, H., Gupta, R., Sinan, T., Prakash, B., Al-Amer, A., & Al-Bolushi, S. (2004). Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Perianal fistulas. Medical Principles and Practice, 14(1), 46-52.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000081923
7. Siddiqui, M. R., Ashrafian, H., Tozer, P., Daulatzai, N., Burling, D., Hart, A., Athanasiou, T., & Phillips, R. K. (2012). A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of Endoanal ultrasound and MRI for Perianal fistula assessment. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 55(5), 576-585.
https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0b013e318249d26c
8. Ahsan, M. F. (2017). Management of Fistula-In-Ano: A local Experience. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College, 6(1), 27-30.
https://jimdc.org.pk/index.php/JIMDC/article/view/85
9. Minhas, S., Raja, R., Khaliq, M., Mahmood, H., Raza, S. M., & Hanif, H. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting and grading perianal fistulas. Rawal Medical Journal, 48(3), 647-647.
10. Irshad, R., & Isani, A. (2025). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance Imaging(Mri) for Perianal fistula tract taking operative findings as gold standard. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 75(SUPPL-1), S16-S19.
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75isuppl-1.5703
11. Zabit, F., Fasih, S., Arif, A. B., Zahoor, O. A., Khan, R., & Naeem, A. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of perianal fistulae and abscesses. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 20(4), 65-67.
https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v20i4.1552
12. Ishfaq, S., Qamar, M. A., & Zaman, M. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistula taking surgical findings as gold standard. Age (years), 50, 50.
13. Ashraf Y, Shabbir J, Ali S, Shahzad N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of perianal fistula with operative correlation. Prof Med J. 2017;24(4): (pagination varies by issue PDF).
14. Patwari, A., Sarkar, N. R., & Saha, M. L. (2020). Preoperative assessment by MR Fistulogram in patients with Perianal fistula and its correlation with operative findings and postoperative outcome. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 7(41), 2356-2359.
https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2020/488
15. Sikander, M., Alia, N., Nazir, M. H., & Liaquat, F. (2025). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting Perianal fistula, taking surgical findings as gold standard. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(6), 55-58.
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i6.1503
16. Baloch, Z., & Nizam, S. (2025). To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging's (MRI) diagnostic accuracy in the pre-operative assessment of Peri-anal fistula. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(6), 744-747.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.