Effectiveness of Narrow versus Wide Chest Tube Drainage in Treating Malignant Pleural Effusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2935Keywords:
Effectiveness, Narrow, Wide Chest Tube, Malignant Pleural Effusion.Abstract
Background: Pleural effusion, characterized by the abnormal accumulation of fluid within the pleural space, is a common manifestation of various pleural diseases. It can result from increased fluid production or impaired lymphatic drainage. Management strategies often involve therapeutic interventions such as thoracentesis, repeated drainage procedures, pleurodesis, or insertion of indwelling pleural catheters. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of Narrow versus Wide Chest Tube Drainage in Treating Malignant Pleural Effusion. Methodology: The current Randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Department of Pulmonology, HMC Peshawar from 10th march 2025 10th June 2205. A total of 60 patients were enrolled with 30 patients allocated to each group A and B. Outcome measures were duration of tube placement, recorded in days, and pain assessments was conducted at various time points using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure pain levels. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22. Mean ± standard deviation was calculated for continuous variables like age, pain score, and duration of tube placement. A categorical variable such as gender and residence was analyzed using frequency distributions and percentages. Results: In group A, the male and female patients were 18 (60%) and 12 (40%) respectively while in group B, the male patients were 17 (56.67%) and female patients were 13 (43.33%). The mean (±SD) age in group A was 45 (±3.44) while in group B it was 46 (±2.97). The means (±SD) VAS (24 h) score in group A was 1.49 (± 3.11) while in group B, it was 4.11 (± 2.01) (p=0.001). The means (±SD) Tube Duration (days) in group A was 11.99 (± 3.22) days while in group B, it was 7.01 (± 2.32) days (p=0.001). Conclusion: According to our research, small-bore chest tubes considerably reduce the level of pain when compared to large-bore tubes. Small-bore tubes usually need more time to place, although overall complication rates are comparable. The results of this research suggest that small-bore chest tubes should be the first choice for treating malignant pleural effusions.
Downloads
References
1. Jany, B., & Welte, T. (2019). Pleural effusion in adults—Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0377
2. Aboudara, M., & Maldonado, F. (2019). Update in the management of pleural effusions. Medical Clinics of North America, 103(3), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2018.12.007
3. Korczyński, P., Górska, K., Konopka, D., Al-Haj, D., Filipiak, K. J., & Krenke, R. (2020). Significance of congestive heart failure as a cause of pleural effusion: Pilot data from a large multidisciplinary teaching hospital. Cardiology Journal, 27(3), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.a2018.0137
4. Skok, K., Hladnik, G., Grm, A., & Crnjac, A. (2019). Malignant pleural effusion and its current management: A review. Medicina, 55(8), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080490
5. Porcel, J. M. (2018). Chest tube drainage of the pleural space: A concise review for Pulmonologists. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 81(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0107
6. Hallifax, R. J., Psallidas, I., & Rahman, N. M. (2017). Chest drain size: The debate continues. Current Pulmonology Reports, 6(1), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3
7. Kulandaisamy, P. C., Kulandaisamy, S., Kramer, D., & Mcgrath, C. (2021). Malignant pleural effusions—A review of current guidelines and practices. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(23), 5535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235535
8. Thethi, I., Ramirez, S., Shen, W., Zhang, D., Mohamad, M., Kaphle, U., & Kheir, F. (2018). Effect of chest tube size on pleurodesis efficacy in malignant pleural effusion: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(1), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.11.134
9. Orlando, A., Cordero, J., Carrick, M. M., Tanner, A. H., Banton, K., Vogel, R., Lieser, M., Acuna, D., & Bar-Or, D. (2020). Comparing complications of small-bore chest tubes to large-bore chest tubes in the setting of delayed hemothorax: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00754-5
10. Ramzan, M., Mahmud, T., Saqib, M., Khan, A. S., Saboor, Q. A., & Mirza, A. R. (2021). A comparative study between-small bore and large bore tubes for therapeutic pleural drainage. Proceedings, 35(2), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.47489/pszmc784-35-2-68-72
11. Walker, C. M., Zhou, C. Y., & Pathak, V. (2021). Adenocarcinoma of the lung with concurrent mycobacterium avium complex infection. Lung India, 38(4), 365-367. https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_470_19
12. Walker, S., Mercer, R., Maskell, N., & Rahman, N. M. (2020). Malignant pleural effusion management: Keeping the flood gates shut. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8(6), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30373-x
13. Alomar, Z., Tawfek, Z., Alomar, Y., Mahmood, I., Alomar, A., El-Menyar, A., Rizoli, S., & Al-Thani, H. (2025). Failure rate and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains in adult patients presenting with traumatic and nontraumatic pleural diseases: A systematic review. Qatar Medical Journal, 2025(2). https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.55
14. Mei, F., Rota, M., Bonifazi, M., Zuccatosta, L., Porcarelli, F. M., Sediari, M., Bedawi, E. O., Sundaralingam, A., Addala, D., Gasparini, S., & Rahman, N. M. (2023). Efficacy of small versus large-bore chest drain in pleural infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiration, 102(3), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529027
15. Stamenovic, D., Dittmar, E., Schiller, P., Trenchev, D., Karampinis, I., Galata, C., & Roessner, E. (2023). A randomized controlled trial: Comparison of 14 and 24 French thoracic drainage after minimally invasive lobectomy – MZ 14-24 study. Heliyon, 9(12), e22049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22049
16. Hallifax, R. J., McKeown, E., Sivakumar, P., Fairbairn, I., Peter, C., Leitch, A., Knight, M., Stanton, A., Ijaz, A., Marciniak, S., Cameron, J., Bhatta, A., Blyth, K. G., Reddy, R., Harris, M., Maddekar, N., Walker, S., West, A., Laskawiec-Szkonter, M., … Rahman, N. M. (2020). Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 396(10243), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31043-6
17. Bediwy, A. S., Al-Biltagi, M., Saeed, N. K., Bediwy, H. A., & Elbeltagi, R. (2023). Pleural effusion in critically ill patients and intensive care setting. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 11(5), 989-999. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.989
18. Qiabi, M. (2021). PLeurodesis Using hypertonic Glucose administration to treat post-operative air leaks following lung resection surgery (PLUG): Phase I trial (Master's thesis, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/7773?utm_source=ir.lib.uwo.ca%2Fetd%2F7773&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
19. Aziz, H., Kwon, Y. I., Lee, K. Y., Park, A. M., Lai, A., Kwon, Y., Aswani, Y., & Pawlik, T. M. (2024). Current evidence on the diagnosis and management of spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 28(12), 2125-2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
