Role of Lumbar Spine Signal Intensity Measurement by MRI in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women

Authors

  • Bushra Kaleem Department of Allied Health Sciences (Radiology), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Mahrosh Hussain Department of Radiology, Abasyn University, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ishaq Lecturer Radiology, Department of Allied health Science (Radiology Technologist), City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Hadeeba Kaleem Department of Allied Health Sciences (Radiology), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Hafiz Shahzad Muzammil Department of Allied Health Sciences (Radiology), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Tayyeb Department of Allied Health Sciences (Radiology), Superior University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v4i2.2940

Keywords:

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal Women, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Lumbar Spine, Bone Mineral Density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Vertebral Marrow Signal Intensity.

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to an increased risk of fractures, particularly in postmenopausal women. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis; however, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has shown potential for opportunistic screening by evaluating bone marrow signal intensity changes associated with bone loss. This study aimed to assess the role of lumbar spine signal intensity measurement by MRI in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at North West Hospital, Peshawar over a period of six months (from May 2025 to October, 2025). A total of 97 postmenopausal women aged 50 years and above were included using a convenience sampling technique. All participants underwent DEXA scanning to determine bone mineral density and lumbar spine MRI using a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Signal intensity of vertebral bodies (L1–L4) was measured and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and MRI-based diagnostic score (M-score) were calculated. MRI findings were compared with DEXA results. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Diagnostic performance of MRI was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and ROC curve analysis. Results: According to DEXA results, 25.8% of participants had normal bone density, 41.2% had osteopenia, 25.8% had osteoporosis, and 7.2% had severe osteoporosis. MRI evaluation showed that 41.2% had a normal marrow pattern, while 46.4% demonstrated increased fat signal intensity. The mean BMD was 0.95 ± 0.12 g/cm² and the mean T-score was −1.2 ± 1.1. MRI-based classification showed 30.9% normal cases, 41.2% suggestive of osteopenia, and 27.8% suggestive of osteoporosis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that physical activity was significantly associated with reduced odds of osteoporosis (OR = 0.38, p = 0.008), while history of fracture significantly increased the odds (OR = 2.45, p = 0.006). Other factors such as age, BMI, hormone replacement therapy use, smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, and thyroid disorders were not significantly associated. Conclusion: Lumbar spine MRI signal intensity measurements show potential as a supportive diagnostic tool for identifying osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. MRI may serve as a useful opportunistic screening method during routine spinal imaging, particularly in settings where DEXA is not readily available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cosman, F., De Beur, S. J., LeBoff, M. S., Lewiecki, E. M., Tanner, B., Randall, S., & Lindsay, R. (2014). Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 25(10), 2359-2381.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2

2. World Health Organization. (2003). Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group. Geneva: WHO.

3. Cauley, J. A. (2005). Bone mineral density and the risk of incident Nonspinal fractures in black and white women. JAMA, 293(17), 2102.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.17.2102

4. Kanis, J. A., Delmas, P., Burckhardt, P., Cooper, C., & Torgerson, D. (1997). Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 7(4), 390-406.

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01623782

5. King, A. B., & Fiorentino, D. M. (2011). Medicare payment cuts for osteoporosis testing reduced use despite tests’ benefit in reducing fractures. Health Affairs, 30(12), 2362-2370.

https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0233

6. Shen, W., Chen, J., Punyanitya, M., Shapses, S., Heshka, S., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2006). MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue is inversely related to DXA-measured bone mineral in Caucasian women. Osteoporosis International, 18(5), 641-647.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0285-9

7. Tang, G., Lv, Z., Tang, R., Liu, Y., Peng, Y., Li, W., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Evaluation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI in detecting bone marrow changes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Clinical Radiology, 65(5), 377-381.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.011

8. Yeung, D. K., Griffith, J. F., Antonio, G. E., Lee, F. K., Woo, J., & Leung, P. C. (2005). Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: A proton MR spectroscopy study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 22(2), 279-285.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20367

9. Griffith, J. F., Yeung, D. K., Antonio, G. E., Wong, S. Y., Kwok, T. C., Woo, J., & Leung, P. C. (2006). Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology, 241(3), 831-838.

https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2413051858

10. Schellinger, D., Lin, C. S., Hatipoglu, H. G., & Fertikh, D. (2001). Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 22(8), 1620-1627.

https://www.ajnr.org/content/22/8/1620.short

11. Shah, L. M., & Hanrahan, C. J. (2011). MRI of spinal bone marrow: Part 1, techniques and normal age-related appearances. American Journal of Roentgenology, 197(6), 1298-1308.

https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.11.7005

12. Abate, N., Burns, D., Peshock, R. M., Garg, A., & Grundy, S. M. (1994). Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: Validation against dissection in human cadavers. Journal of Lipid Research, 35(8), 1490-1496.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)40090-2

13. Shen, W., Scherzer, R., Gantz, M., Chen, J., Punyanitya, M., Lewis, C. E., & Grunfeld, C. (2012). Relationship between MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue and hip and spine bone mineral density in African-American and Caucasian participants: The CARDIA study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 97(4), 1337-1346.

https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2605

14. Bandirali, M., Di Leo, G., Papini, G. D., Messina, C., Sconfienza, L. M., Ulivieri, F. M., & Sardanelli, F. (2015). A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI. European Radiology, 25(10), 2951-2959.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3699-y

15. International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). ISCD official positions: adult. Middletown: ISCD; 2013.

16. Genant, H. K., Wu, C. Y., Van Kuijk, C., & Nevitt, M. C. (1993). Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 8(9), 1137-1148.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080915

17. Schousboe, J. T., Shepherd, J. A., Bilezikian, J. P., & Baim, S. (2013). Executive summary of the 2013 international society for clinical densitometry position development conference on bone densitometry. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 16(4), 455-466.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.004

18. Elliot-Gibson, V., Bogoch, E., Jamal, S., & Beaton, D. (2004). Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: A systematic review. Osteoporosis International, 15(10).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1675-5

19. Kanis, J. A. (2002). Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. The Lancet, 359(9321), 1929-1936.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08761-5

20. Marshall, D., Johnell, O., & Wedel, H. (1996). Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ, 312(7041), 1254-1259.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Kaleem, B., Hussain, M., Muhammad Ishaq, Kaleem, H., Muzammil, H. S., & Muhammad Tayyeb. (2026). Role of Lumbar Spine Signal Intensity Measurement by MRI in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 4(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v4i2.2940