Comparison of Open vs Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Haglund's Deformity

Authors

  • Afaq Ahmad Department of Orthopedics, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Shahid Mahmood Department of Orthopedics, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2951

Keywords:

Haglund’s deformity, endoscopic calcaneoplasty, open surgery, heel pain, Achilles tendon, orthopedic surgery

Abstract

Background: Haglund’s deformity is a common cause of posterior heel pain resulting from a bony enlargement at the posterosuperior aspect of the calcaneus, which can irritate the Achilles tendon and retrocalcaneal bursa. When conservative treatment fails, surgical intervention becomes necessary. Both open and endoscopic surgical techniques are used for its management, but their comparative outcomes remain an area of clinical interest. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of open versus endoscopic surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity in terms of pain relief, functional recovery, postoperative complications, and return to normal activities. Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at Orthopedic Department Bahawal Victoria Hospital QAMC Bahawalpur from 24 January 2025 to 24 June 2025. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with Haglund’s deformity were included and divided into two groups. Group A (n=30) underwent open surgical treatment, while Group B (n=30) underwent endoscopic surgery. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Postoperative complications and recovery time were also recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement after surgery; however, the endoscopic surgery group demonstrated lower postoperative pain scores, higher functional outcomes, fewer complications, and a faster return to daily activities compared with the open surgery group. Conclusion: Endoscopic surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity appears to be a safe and effective alternative to open surgery, offering better postoperative recovery and fewer complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Grambart, S. T., Lechner, J., & Wentz, J. (2021). Differentiating Achilles insertional calcific tendinosis and Haglund’s deformity. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 38(2), 165-181.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2020.12.003

2. Strasser, N. L., & Farina, K. A. (2021). Haglund's syndrome and insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 29(3), 150850.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsm.2021.150850

3. Chen, J., Hua, Y., Amendola, A., & Cerrato, R. (2022). Haglund’s Deformity and Retrocalcaneal Bursitis. In Arthroscopic Techniques and Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle: A Surgical Atlas (pp. 211-223). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05190-6_17

4. Pargeon, M., & Tjiattas-Saleski, L. (2023). Haglund deformity of the posterior heel. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 123(7), 365-366.

https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0022

5. Alessio‐Mazzola, M., Russo, A., Capello, A. G., Lovisolo, S., Repetto, I., Formica, M., & Felli, L. (2021). Endoscopic calcaneoplasty for the treatment of Haglund’s deformity provides better clinical functional outcomes, lower complication rate, and shorter recovery time compared to open procedures: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(8), 2462-2484.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06362-1

6. Seemathan, P., & Husna, H. (2024). Effectiveness of laser therapy along with eccentric exercises vs laser therapy with concentric exercises for subjects with Haglund's deformity. Fizjoterapia Polska, (5).

https://doi.org/10.56984/8zg020crt8h

7. Khurana, A., & Vellaipandi, V. (2024). Heel Pain. In Clinical and Radiological Examination of the Foot and Ankle: The Path to Definitive Diagnosis (pp. 159-170). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4202-8_11

8. Flores, D. V., Goes, P. K., Damer, A., & Huang, B. K. (2024). The heel complex: anatomy, imaging, pathologic conditions, and treatment. Radiographics, 44(4), e230163.

https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230163

9. Choo, Y. J., Park, C. H., & Chang, M. C. (2020). Rearfoot disorders and conservative treatment: a narrative review. Annals of palliative medicine, 9(5), 3546552-3543552.

https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-446

10. Heyes, G. J., & Mason, L. (2021). Foot and ankle. In Current Orthopaedic Practice (pp. 251-301). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78529-1_6

11. Butterworth, M. L., & Block, A. J. (2022). Update on Fibrocartilaginous Disease Clinical Examination. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 39(3), 371-392.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2022.03.002

12. Kim, J., Rajan, L., Fuller, R., Sofka, C., Cororaton, A., Demetracopoulos, C., ... & Deland, J. (2022). Radiographic cutoff values for predicting lateral bony impingement in progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot & Ankle International, 43(9), 1219-1226.

https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007221099010

13. Szaro, P., Nilsson-Helander, K., & Carmont, M. (2021). MRI of the Achilles tendon—a comprehensive pictorial review. Part one. European Journal of Radiology Open, 8, 100342.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100342

14. Pass, B., Robinson, P., Ha, A., Levine, B., Yablon, C. M., & Rowbotham, E. (2022). The Achilles tendon: imaging diagnoses and image-guided interventions—AJR expert panel narrative review. American Journal of Roentgenology, 219(3), 355-368.

https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.22.27632

15. Papineni, V. R. K., Mariathas, M., Sidhu, S. S., & Chari, B. (2024). Imaging modalities for non-acute pathologies of the foot and ankle. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 48, 102329.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102329

16. Cengiz, B., & Karaoglu, S. (2022). Clinical results of the Keck and Kelly Wedge Osteotomy approach in Haglund's deformity: Minimum 3-year follow-up. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 28(2), 269-275.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.10.006

17. Lotliker, S. D., Verma, S., Bhalla, A., Shah, M., Mekewar, S., & Sharma, A. (2024). Heel Pain Management in Haglund’s Deformity Targeting Sural Nerve Branches under Ultrasound Guidance: Case Report. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports, 14(2), 12.

https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i02.4200

18. Ko, V. M. C., Cao, M., Qiu, J., Fong, I. C. K., Fu, S. C., Yung, P. S. H., & Ling, S. K. K. (2023). Comparative short-term effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 24(1), 102.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06170-x

19. Zhang, C., Cao, J., Yang, L., & Duan, X. (2021). Surgical treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy and retrocalcaneal bursitis: more than 1 year of follow-up. Journal of International Medical Research, 49(3), 0300060521992959.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060521992959

20. Mishra, A. K., & Singh, C. (2021). A prospective observational study on the functional outcome of retrocalcaneal bursitis following arthroscopic management. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 8(3), 262-268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2020.12.004

21. Kilic, E., Bingol, O., Ozdemir, G., Deveci, A., Durgal, A., & Karahan, T. E. (2024). Comparison of Lateral and Central Achilles Tendon–Splitting Approaches in the Treatment of Haglund Deformity. Foot & Ankle International, 45(8), 845-851.

https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007241250003

22. Lughi, M. (2020). Haglund’s syndrome: endoscopic or open treatment? Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 91(4-S), 167.

23. Cusumano, A., Martinelli, N., Bianchi, A., Bertelli, A., Marangon, A., & Sansone, V. (2021). Transtendinous approach calcaneoplasty versus endoscopic calcaneoplasty for Haglund’s disease. International Orthopaedics, 45(1), 225-231.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04761-0

24. Opdam, K. T., Zwiers, R., Vroemen, J., Sierevelt, I. N., Wiegerinck, J. I., & van Dijk, C. N. (2021). High patient satisfaction and good long-term functional outcome after endoscopic calcaneoplasty in patients with retrocalcaneal bursitis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(5), 1494-1501.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06167-2

25. Rızvanoğlu, İ. H., Gönder, N., & Çalışal, E. (2024). Haglund’s deformity: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Acta Medica, 55(2), 120-127.

https://doi.org/10.32552/2024.actamedica.1008

26. Restuccia, G., Del Chiaro, A., Lippi, A., Ipponi, E., Sacchetti, F., & Benifei, M. (2021). Complications after a surgical lateral approach to Haglund’s syndrome: case report of sural nerve traumatic neuroma and review of the literature. Lo Scalpello-Journal, 35, 171-174.

https://doi.org/10.36149/0390-5276-226

Downloads

Published

2025-07-20

How to Cite

Ahmad, A., & Mahmood, S. (2025). Comparison of Open vs Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Haglund’s Deformity. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 1636-1641. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.2951