Comparison of Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Robot Assisted Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Cemoon Effendi Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Shahid Rasul Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Mansab Ali Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Rafia Wakil Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sana Aftab Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Zoha Ainain Channa Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.3137

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy; Gallstones; Laparoscopy; Postoperative complications; Robotics

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus robot assisted cholecystectomy in patients at tertiary care hospital, Karachi. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Duration and Place of Study: Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi from March 2025 to May 2025. Methodology: Total 96 patients (n=96) age 18–65 years were included and divided into two groups with 48 in laparoscopic group and 48 in robot assisted group. Data recorded for demographics and outcomes. Operative time, blood loss, bile spillage, wound complication and pain score were noted. Data analysed by independent sample t test and chi square test or Fischer exact test. Results: Mean age in laparoscopic group was 47.06 ± 9.87 years and in robot group 43.81 ± 9.98 years. Female were 26 (54.2%) in laparoscopic group and 30 (62.5%) in robot group. Operative time was more in robot group 81.81 ± 8.93 minutes as compared to laparoscopic group 57.13 ± 7.33 minutes (p<0.001). Blood loss was 40.88 ± 17.33 ml in laparoscopic and 43.10 ± 15.32 ml in robot group (p=0.506). Bile spillage seen in 7 (14.6%) laparoscopic and 11 (22.9%) robot group (p=0.296). Wound complication was 5 (10.4%) in laparoscopic and 2 (4.2%) in robot group (p=0.435). Pain score also not significant between groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both methods are safe and effective but robot assisted cholecystectomy take more operative time with similar outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Shrestha BB, Lakhe G, Ghimire P. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care center: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024;62(276):502-506.

https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.8719

2. Linkwinstar D, Shine A, Naseem H, Zara S, Jabbir S, Ravendran K. Comparing single-incision cholecystectomy and multiple-incision cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative complications. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e78434. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78434

3. Ansari U, Syed B, Sedighi R, Ansari K, Akhtar M, Davies Y. Advancing robotic single-site cholecystectomy: innovations, challenges, and future directions. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e60643. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60643

4. Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45704. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45704

5. Tebala GD, Bianchi PP, Bond-Smith G, Coratti A, Panaro F, Pernazza G, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: can they be compared? a narrative review and personal considerations disproving low-level evidence. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025;29(1):5-10.

https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-192

6. Seeger N, Mignot H, Matthaei H, Gantner L, Kuchen N, O'Sullivan O, et al. Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with DEXTER®: the first prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2025;39(12):8254-8262.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12174-6

7. Agrawal N, Singh S, Khichy S. Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a scoring method. Niger J Surg. 2015;21(2):130-133.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-6806.162567

8. Al-Saeed AA, Alghannam G. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery: a comparative assessment of outcomes, complications, recovery, and cost. J Med Life. 2025;18(12):1068-1075.

https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0139

9. Huang J, Tan Z, Wu W, Wu X, Liu L, Li C. Effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery on postoperative wound infection in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21(2):e14437.

https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14437

10. Agrawal AA, Parthsarthi PA, Patel HA, Sanmugam KR, Vyas AH, James J. Role of robotic surgery in general surgical procedures. Bioinformation. 2025;21(11):4076-4079.

https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300214076

11. Lee SM, Lim JH. Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021;25:78-83.

https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.78

12. Klein J, Lemma M, Prabhakaran K, Rafieezadeh A, Kirsch JM, Rodriguez G, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic emergency and acute care surgery: redefining novelty (RLEARN). Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024;9:e001522.

https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522

13. Singh A, Kaur M, Swaminathan C, Siby J, Singh KK, Sajid MS. Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;9:3.

https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-56

14. Singhal VK, Moussa H, Alaswad FD, Sulaiman AM, Senofer NM, Singhal R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Int J Med Sci Clin Invent. 2023;10(12):6975-6979.

https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmsci/v10i12.01

15. Gantschnigg A, Koch OO, Singhartinger F, Tschann P, Hitzl W, Emmanuel K, et al. Short-term outcomes and costs analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a retrospective single-centre analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408:299.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03037-6

16. Ghanem M, Shaheen S, Blebea J, Tuma F, Zayout M, Conti N, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case-control outcome analysis and surgical resident training implications. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7641.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7641

17. Chabot S, Calleja-Agius J, Horeman T. A comparison of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Preprints. 2023.

https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0246.v1

18. Willuth E, Hardon SF, Lang F, Haney CM, Felinska EA, Kowalewski KF, et al. Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices: a randomised crossover study. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(2):1064-1079.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08373-6

19. Kawka M, Jawad ZAR, Hakim D, Pai M, Nazarian S, Gall TMH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: an observational study. Surg Endosc. 2025;39:2958-2963.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11586-8

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Effendi, C., Rasul, S., Ali, M., Wakil, R., Aftab, S., & Channa, Z. A. (2025). Comparison of Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Robot Assisted Cholecystectomy. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(7), 1761-1765. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.3137