Intensive vs. Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study

Authors

  • Tooba Adil Community Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5707-1702
  • Zafar Ahmad Khan Department of Medicine, Bolan Medical College, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Misbah Farooq Awan Combined Military Hospital (CMH), AJK, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.
  • Ghazala Masood Farrukh Department of Physiology, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Nuzhat Firdous Principal, Ziauddin Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery (ZUFONAM), Sukkur Campus, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Shazia Nazar Department of Physiology, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.460

Keywords:

Type 2 Diabetes, Systolic Blood Pressure Control, Cardiovascular Events, Hyperkalemia, Hypotension, Mortality, Intensive Treatment, Standard Treatment, Diabetes Management, Cox Regression

Abstract

Background: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) control is a critical aspect of managing Type 2 diabetes, which is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This retrospective study compares the effects of intensive SBP control (targeting < 120 mmHg) versus standard SBP control (targeting < 140 mmHg) on cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and adverse effects in Type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: A total of 500 patients with Type 2 diabetes were included, with 250 in the intensive control group and 250 in the standard control group. Cardiovascular outcomes (heart attacks, strokes, cardiovascular mortality), adverse effects (hypotension, hyperkalemia), and medication adherence were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to evaluate the effect of intensive SBP control on cardiovascular risk. Results: The intensive control group showed a significantly lower incidence of heart attacks (4.8% vs. 7.2%, p=0.03), strokes (3.2% vs. 5.6%, p=0.02), and cardiovascular mortality (2.4% vs. 4.8%, p=0.04) compared to the standard control group. However, the intensive group had a higher incidence of hyperkalemia (3.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.04) and symptomatic hypotension (5.6% vs. 3.2%, p=0.09). Cox regression analysis revealed a 21% reduced risk of major cardiovascular events in the intensive control group (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, p=0.04). Conclusion: Intensive SBP control significantly reduces cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes. However, the increased risk of hyperkalemia and hypotension suggests that careful monitoring and individualized treatment strategies are essential. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and refine management guidelines for patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aurangzeb, L., Tayyab, M., Umar, Z., Ahmad, Z., Khan, M. S., Hunain, M., Ullah, S., Ali, M., Safdar, S., & Malik, A. (2024). The association between pulmonary embolism and long-term cardiovascular disease progression: A meta-analysis of heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and hospitalization rates. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 2(2), 494-501. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v2i02.228

Bi, Y., Li, M., Liu, Y., Li, T., Lu, J., Duan, P., Xu, F., Dong, Q., Wang, A., Wang, T., Zheng, R., Chen, Y., Xu, M., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Niu, Y., Kang, Z., Lu, C., Wang, J., & Qiu, X. (2024). Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2412006

Bianchi, S., Aucella, F., De Nicola, L., Genovesi, S., Paoletti, E., & Regolisti, G. (2019). Management of hyperkalemia in patients with kidney disease: A position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology. Journal of Nephrology, 32(4), 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-019-00617-y

Bizimana, R. T. (2024). The impact of lifestyle modifications on type 2 diabetes prevention and management. IDOSR JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ALLIED FIELDS, 9(3), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.59298/idosr/jbbaf/24/93.1824000

Gallo, G., & Savoia, C. (2024). Hypertension and heart failure: From pathophysiology to treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(12), 6661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126661

Group, A. S. (2010). "Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus." New England Journal of Medicine 362(17): 1575-1585. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1001286

Huang, R., Lin, Y., Liu, M., Xiong, Z., Zhang, S., Zhong, X., Ye, X., Huang, Y., Zhuang, X., & Liao, X. (2022). Time in target range for systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.121.022765

Karunarathna, I., & Jayathilaka, P. (2024). Comprehensive Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: From Prevention to Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Uva Clinical Lab. Retrieved from Comprehensive Management of Type, 2.

Karunarathna, I., Kusumarathna, K., Jayathilaka, P., & Withanage, C. (2024). Comprehensive Management of Hypertension: Strategies, Guidelines, and Emerging Therapies. Uva Clinical Lab. Retrieved from Comprehensive Management of Hypertension: Strategies, Guidelines, and Emerging Therapies.

Ling, Q., Dong, X., Bai, J., Deng, Y., Song, Q., & Cai, J. (2024). Impact of hypertension duration on the cardiovascular benefit of intensive blood pressure control. Hypertension, 81(9), 1945-1955. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23439

Nassar, M. A., Albargi, A. H., Alsulami, A. M., Alotaibi, H. S., Abulela, A. A., Badawe, A. A., ... & Alnejidi, A. M. (2024). The Impact of Hyperkalemia on Cardiac Function in ICU Patients.

Pavlou, D. I., Paschou, S. A., Anagnostis, P., Spartalis, M., Spartalis, E., Vryonidou, A., Tentolouris, N., & Siasos, G. (2018). Hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Targets and management. Maturitas, 112, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.013

Ubhenin, A. E., Innih, S. O., Anura, F., & Idris, R. I. (2024). Navigating the complexity: Updates in diabetes-related cardiovascular complications. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 28(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v28i1.2

Vejendla, M., Anagani, M., & Oroszi, T. (2025). Diabetes and hypertension. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 15(01), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2025.151002

Williamson, J. D., Supiano, M. A., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Campbell, R. C., Chertow, G. M., Fine, L. J., Haley, W. E., Hawfield, A. T., Ix, J. H., Kitzman, D. W., Kostis, J. B., Krousel-Wood, M. A., Launer, L. J., Oparil, S., Rodriguez, C. J., Roumie, C. L., Shorr, R. I., Sink, K. M., & Wadley, V. G. (2016). Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years. JAMA, 315(24), 2673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7050

Wu, P., Chao, C., Hsiao, C., Yang, C., Lee, Y., Lin, H., Yeh, C., Lee, L., Huang, K., Lee, M., Huang, C., Lin, Y., Chen, M. Y., & Chan, D. (2024). Blood pressure targets, medication consideration and unique concerns in elderly hypertension IV: Focus on frailty, orthostatic hypotension, and resistant hypertension. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2024.09.022

Zhang, K., Song, Q., Bai, J., & Cai, J. (2024). Association of intensive blood pressure management with cardiovascular outcomes in patients using multiple classes of antihypertensive medications: A post-hoc analysis of the STEP trial. Hypertension Research, 47(7), 1779-1788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01647-1

Downloads

Published

2025-01-05

How to Cite

Intensive vs. Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.460