Comprehensive Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis of D-Dimer Utilization, Imaging Modalities (CTPA and V/Q Scan), and Clinical Risk Stratification Tools

Authors

  • Muhammad Daud Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Anees Department of Emergency Medicine, Trauma Center Zhob, Balochistan, Pakistan.
  • Hakim Ullah Wazir Medical Student, Gajju Khan Medical College, Swabi, KP, Pakistan.
  • Zaheer Ahmad Department of Pulmonology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Zeeshan Umar Department of Emergency Medicine, Pak Emirates Military Hospital (PEMH) Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Wajeeha Arif Department of Medicine, Khalifa Gul Nawaz Teaching Hospital, Bannu, KP, Pakistan.
  • Sohail Ahmad Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Nabila Fayaz Department of Internal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
  • Sadaf Said Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.511

Keywords:

Pulmonary Embolism, D-Dimer, CTPA, V/Q Scan, Clinical Risk Stratification

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious condition caused by blood clots blocking the pulmonary arteries, requiring early diagnosis for effective management. Diagnostic procedures include clinical evaluation based on patient risk, D-Dimer biomarker tests, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and V/Q scans. However, adherence to these diagnostic guidelines is not always consistent. This audit aimed to assess the diagnostic procedures for suspected acute PE at Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), focusing on D-Dimer testing, imaging, and clinical probability assessments. Methodology: This retrospective audit analyzed records of 300 patients over one year who were suspected of having PE. Patient data, including demographic information, clinical symptoms, and diagnostic tests (D-Dimer, CTPA, and V/Q scans), were collected. Risk stratification was done using the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores. The audit examined adherence to diagnostic protocols and evaluated the time from patient presentation to diagnosis. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. Results and Discussion: The audit found that 80% of patients underwent D-Dimer testing, and 70% had imaging. CTPA was the primary imaging method for 70% of patients, with PE confirmed in 40%. Risk assessments showed 50% of patients were at intermediate risk. Diagnostic processes were generally efficient, although 10 cases had issues, and 3.3% of patients experienced adverse events. Key concerns identified included the need for better compliance with guidelines and improved diagnostic organization. Conclusion: This audit highlights the importance of adhering to clinical pathways and optimizing diagnostic procedures at LRH. Recommendations include stricter guideline compliance, simplifying diagnostic algorithms, and ensuring appropriate imaging use for PE diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cao, J., Sun, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Echocardiography, 39(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15280

Cueto-Robledo, G., Cervantes-Naranjo, F., Gonzalez-Hermosillo, L., Roldan-Valadez, E., Graniel-Palafox, L., Castro-Escalante, K., & Orozco-Zuñiga, B. (2023). Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: An updated review with case series description. Current Problems in Cardiology, 48(7), 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101683

Falster, C., Hellfritzsch, M., Gaist, T. A., Brabrand, M., Bhatnagar, R., Nybo, M., Andersen, N. H., & Egholm, G. (2023). Comparison of international guideline recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. The Lancet Haematology, 10(11), e922-e935. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00181-3

Kruger, R. A., Du Plessis, J., & Muller, H. (2024). Pulmonary embolism diagnosis with D-dimer levels and computed tomography. Health SA Gesondheid, 29. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2620

Lasanudin, J. E., Laksono, S., & Kusharsamita, H. (2023). Current diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: A strategy for general practitioners in emergency department. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic), 66(4), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.8

Motiwala, A., Tanwir, H., Duarte, A., Gilani, S., DeAnda, A., Zaidan, M. F., & Jneid, H. (2024). Multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary embolism and the role of the pulmonary embolism response team. Current Cardiology Reports, 26(8), 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02084-9

Naum, A. G., Jari, I., Moisii, L., Ursu, A. M., & Moisii, P. (2024). Imaging and biomarkers: The Assesment of pulmonary embolism risk and early mortality. Medicina, 60(9), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091489

Pagkalidou, E., Doundoulakis, I., Apostolidou-Kiouti, F., Bougioukas, K. I., Papadopoulos, K., Tsapas, A., Farmakis, I. T., Antonopoulos, A. S., Giannakoulas, G., & Haidich, A. (2024). An overview of systematic reviews on imaging tests for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism applying different network meta-analytic methods. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology, 76, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2023.05.006

Sarto, G., Simeone, B., Spadafora, L., Bernardi, M., Rocco, E., Pelle, G., Liberati, Q., Forte, M., Schirone, L., Versaci, F., Piaz, R. D., Palmerio, S., Barberi, A., Frati, G., Bellini, D., Rengo, M., Carbone, I., Sciarretta, S., & Valenti, V. (2024). Management of acute chest pain in the emergency department: Benefits of coronary computed tomography angiography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 40(12), 2447-2457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03274-w

Selby, R., Meijer, P., & Favaloro, E. J. (2024). D-dimer diagnostics: Can I use any D-dimer assay? Bridging the knowledge-to-action gap. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 8(1), 102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102335

Teissandier, D., Roussel, M., Bannelier, H., Freund, Y., & Catoire, P. (2024). Contemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: A clinical review. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, 11(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.157

Thomas, S. E., Weinberg, I., Schainfeld, R. M., Rosenfield, K., & Parmar, G. M. (2024). Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A review of evidence-based approaches. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(13), 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133722

Wauthier, L., Favresse, J., Hardy, M., Douxfils, J., Le Gal, G., Roy, P., Van Es, N., Ay, C., Ten Cate, H., Vander Borght, T., Dupont, M. V., Lecompte, T., Lippi, G., & Mullier, F. (2022). D-dimer testing in pulmonary embolism with a focus on potential pitfalls: A narrative review. Diagnostics, 12(11), 2770. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112770

Wauthier, L., Favresse, J., Hardy, M., Douxfils, J., Le Gal, G., Roy, P., Van Es, N., Ay, C., Ten Cate, H., Lecompte, T., Lippi, G., & Mullier, F. (2023). D-dimer testing: A narrative review. Advances in Clinical Chemistry, 151-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2023.02.006

Downloads

Published

2025-01-19

How to Cite

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis of D-Dimer Utilization, Imaging Modalities (CTPA and V/Q Scan), and Clinical Risk Stratification Tools. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(1), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i1.511