Supraclavicular Flaps for Face Reconstruction with Reduced Donor Site Morbidity and Without the Need for Microsurgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.962Keywords:
Supraclavicular Flap, Face Reconstruction, ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Facial reconstructive surgery is used to restore facial structure and functions as close to normal as possible. It is challenging to satisfy the patients as the facial anatomy reconstruction is very difficult. Objective: To determine the frequency of post-treatment complications in supraclavicular flaps for face reconstruction. Methodology: This descriptive case series study was conducted in department of Burns and Plastic Surgery Center, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar from July 03, 2024 to January 03, 2025. According to WHO calculator 1.1, total 110 male and female patients of age between 30 and 60, who gave informed consent were included in the study. Those patients who had scar/previous surgery in the area of supraclavicular artery flap and patients requiring radical neck dissection on the side of the flap were excluded from the study. The study was conducted after approval of the research project from ethical board. Result: One hundred-ten patients underwent supraclavicular flap reconstruction of a head and neck defect. The average age was 44.89 years (range, 30–60 years). After average hospital stay of 5.25 days (minimum 3 days, maximum 7 days), 30 patients developed wound dehiscence, 10 patients developed Transitory venous insufficiency, 7 patients developed contractures and 7 patients developed complete flap necrosis. There was significant association of gender, cause of injury and age with wound complications (p<0.05) while defect location showed non-significant association with won complications (p=0.582). Conclusion: The cause of injury was linked to a higher likelihood of wound dehiscence, and following the repair of cutaneous defects, there were no recipient surgical site infections. Patients who experienced wound difficulties were more likely to develop fistulas and stay in the hospital longer after surgery, as was to be predicted.
Downloads
References
Kadota, H., & Imai, Y. (2024). Safe and reliable use of Supraclavicular flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 35(8), 2424-2426. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010483
Sukato, D. C., Timashpolsky, A., Ferzli, G., Rosenfeld, R. M., & Gordin, E. A. (2018). Systematic review of Supraclavicular artery island flap vs free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 160(2), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818803603
Min, P., Li, J., Brunetti, B., Pu, Z., Su, W., Xi, W., Zhang, Z., Salzillo, R., Feng, S., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Pre-expanded bipedicled visor flap: An ideal option for the reconstruction of upper and lower lip defects postburn in Asian males. Burns & Trauma, 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa005
Zeiderman, M. R., & Pu, L. L. (2020). Contemporary reconstruction after complex facial trauma. Burns & Trauma, 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa003
Pallua, N., & Von Heimburg, D. (2005). Pre-expanded ultra-thin Supraclavicular flaps for (full-) face reconstruction with reduced donor-site morbidity and without the need for microsurgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 115(7), 1837-1844. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000165080.70891.88
Jerome, T. J., Sabtharishi, V., & SK, T. (2021). Supraclavicular flap for severe post-burn neck contracture in children. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12910
Jahromi, A. H., Horen, S. R., Miller, E. J., & Konofaos, P. (2022). A comprehensive review on the Supraclavicular flap for head and neck reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 88(6), e20-e32. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000003098
Herr, M. W., Emerick, K. S., & Deschler, D. G. (2014). The Supraclavicular artery flap for head and neck reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 16(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2170
Goyal, N., Emerick, K. S., Deschler, D. G., Lin, D. T., Yarlagadda, B. B., Rich, D. L., & Durand, M. L. (2016). Risk factors for surgical site infection after supraclavicular flap reconstruction in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Head & Neck, 38(11), 1615-1620. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24480
Shah, S. A., Bilal, M., & Hayat, W. (2019). EXTENDED SUPRACLAVICULAR ARTERY FLAP EXPLORING THE UNEXPLORED. Journal of Khyber College of Dentistry, 9(03), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v9i03.348
Shen, T. (1985). Microvascular transplantation of prefabricated free thigh flap. Recent Advances in Burns and Plastic Surgery — The Chinese Experience, 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4900-3_20
Barthélémy, I., Martin, D., Sannajust, J., Marck, K., & Mondié, J. (2002). Prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap combined with a submental flap in noma surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 109(3), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200203000-00019
Kokot, N., Mazhar, K., Reder, L. S., Peng, G. L., & Sinha, U. K. (2013). The Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 139(11), 1247. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5057
Emerick, K. S., Herr, M. W., Lin, D. T., Santos, F., & Deschler, D. G. (2014). Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of complex Parotidectomy, lateral skull base, and total Auriculectomy defects. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 140(9), 861. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1394
Spiegel, J. L., Pilavakis, Y., Canis, M., & Welz, C. (2018). Shoulder morbidity in patients after head and neck reconstruction with the pedicled Supraclavicular island flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 6(4), e1711. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000001711
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.