Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment and Fistulotomy Plus Seton for High-Lying Perianal Fistula

Taskeen Zehra Rizvi; Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh; Muhammad Umar; Tanzeela Akram

doi:10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1016

Authors

Taskeen Zehra Rizvi Department of General Surgery, National Hospital & Medical Centre, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh Vice Chancellor, King Edward Medical University/ National Hospital & Medical Centre, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Umar Department of Surgery, Mayo Cancer Care Hospital/King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Tanzeela Akram Professor and Head of Department of Physiology, Queens Medical College, Kasur, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1016

Keywords:

Anal Incontinence, Recurrence, High Perianal Fistula, Seton, Vaaft

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to compare video-assisted anal fistula treatment with fistulotomy plus seton in the management of high perianal fistula in terms of postoperative outcomes. There is limited research on the treatments of high-lying perianal fistulae. This study will help us improve pain severity, return the patients to regular work, improve healing time, and reduce the recurrence rate, leading to better patient management. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Study Period: From July 20, 2024, to January 19, 2025. Methodology: There were 60 patients of high-lying perianal fistulae, ranging in age from 18 to 60 years. Patients having a history of prior perianal surgery, a medical record-based history of inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or a lump on a digital rectal examination that suggested malignancy were excluded. All the patients were assigned to two groups using an online randomizer, i.e., Group A were undergone video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and Group B were undergone fistulotomy plus seton. Postoperative pain was determined 6 hours after the surgery using the visual analogue score. Patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic at three months to determine healing status, anal incontinence and recurrent rate. Findings: Group A (VAAFT) experienced mean post-operative pain of 5.41 ± 1.89, whereas Group B (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced mean post-operative pain of 3.24 ± 1.29 (p-value = 0.0001). In Group A (VAAFT), the mean healing time was 38.40 ± 5.25 days, whereas in Group B (fistulotomy plus seton), it was 25.93 ± 4.30 days (p-value = 0.0001). 33.33% and 0.0% of patients in group A (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced post-operative pain and anal incontinence, respectively, whereas 13.33% and 0.0% of patients in group B (fistulotomy plus seton) did the same. Conclusion: VAAFT is a novel sphincter-saving procedure used to treat high perianal fistulas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nazari, H., Soltani, Z. E., Asbagh, R. A., Sharifi, A., Badripour, A., Tabasi, A. H., Warkiani, M. E., Keramati, M. R., Behboodi, B., Fazeli, M. S., Keshvari, A., Rahimi, M., & Tafti, S. M. (2022). Advancing standard techniques for treatment of perianal fistula; when tissue engineering meets Seton. Health Sciences Review, 3, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100026

Owen, H., Buchanan, G., Schizas, A., Cohen, R., & Williams, A. (2016). Quality of life with anal fistula. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 98(5), 334-338. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0136

Ratto, C., Grossi, U., Litta, F., Di Tanna, G. L., Parello, A., De Simone, V., Tozer, P., DE Zimmerman, D., & Maeda, Y. (2019). Contemporary surgical practice in the management of anal fistula: Results from an international survey. Techniques in Coloproctology, 23(8), 729-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02051-5

Zahra, A., Malla, J., Selvaraj, R., Dhanoa, R., Venugopal, S., Shoukrie, S. I., Selvamani, T. Y., Hamouda, R. K., & Hamid, P. (2022). A comparison of different surgical treatments for complex anal fistula: A systematic review. Cureus, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28289

Cheung, F., Appleton, N., Rout, S., Kalaiselvan, R., Nicholson, J., Samad, A., Chadwick, M., & Rajaganeshan, R. (2018). Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: A high volume unit initial experience. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 100(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0187

Zhang, Y., Li, F., Zhao, T., Cao, F., Zheng, Y., & Li, A. (2020). Efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler for parks II anal fistula. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8(22), 1517-1517. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7154

Siddique, S., Changazi, S. H., Bhatti, S., Afzal, B., Hyidar, Z., Rehman, A., Ahmad, Q. A., & Ayyaz, M. (2022). Outcomes in high Perianal fistula repair using video-assisted anal fistula treatment compared with Seton use: A randomized controlled trial. Cureus, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22166

Liu, H., Tang, X., Chang, Y., Li, A., Li, Z., Xiao, Y., ... & Jiang, H. (2020). Comparison of surgical outcomes between video-assisted anal fistula treatment and fistulotomy plus seton for complex anal fistula: A propensity score matching analysis-Retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery, 75, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.137

Andley, M., Anand, A., Kumar, A., Saurabh, G., Saha, S. & Kumar A, et al. (2017). Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (sages) Houston, Texas, USA, 22-25 March 2017: Oral presentations. Surg Endosc. 31(Suppl 1), 1-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5444-x

Zheng, L., Lu, J., Pu, Y., Xing, C., & Zhao, K. (2018). Comparative study of clinical efficacy between video-assisted anal fistula treatment and traditional fistula resection plus seton in treatment of complex anal fistula. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi= Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 21(7), 793-797. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30051448

Choi, D., Sung Kim, H., Seo, H., & Oh, N. (2010). Patient-performed Seton irrigation for the treatment of deep horseshoe fistula. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 53(5), 812-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181d2a8f9

Chuang-Wei, C., Chang-Chieh, W., Cheng-Wen, H., Tsai-Yu, L., Chun-Che, F., & Shu-Wen, J. (2008). Cutting Seton for complex anal fistulas. The Surgeon, 6(3), 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80117-5

Ege, B., Leventoğlu, S., Menteş, B. B., Yılmaz, U., & Öner, A. Y. (2013). Hybrid Seton for the treatment of high anal fistulas: Results of 128 consecutive patients. Techniques in Coloproctology, 18(2), 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1021-z

Munir, A., & Falah, S. Q. (2014). Management of high fistula in ano with cutting seton. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences, 12(4). https://gjms.com.pk/index.php/journal/article/view/548

Andreou, C., Zeindler, J., Oertli, D., & Misteli, H. (2020). Longterm outcome of anal fistula – A retrospective study. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63541-3

Meinero, P., & Mori, L. (2011). Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): A novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Techniques in Coloproctology, 15(4), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0769-2

MENDES, C. R., FERREIRA, L. S., SAPUCAIA, R. A., LIMA, M. A., & ARAUJO, S. E. (2014). Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: Technical considerations and preliminary results of the first Brazilian experience. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), 27(1), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-67202014000100018

Wałęga, P., Romaniszyn, M., & Nowak, W. (2014). VAAFT: A new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas – initial results. Polish Journal of Surgery, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/pjs-2014-0002

Kochhar, G., Saha, S., Andley, M., Kumar, A., Saurabh, G., Pusuluri, R., Bhise, V., & Kumar, A. (2014). Video-assisted anal fistula treatment. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 18(3), e2014.00127. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2014.00127