Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Terms of Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection of Rotator Cuff Tears Keeping MRI as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Nawal Naseem Department of Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Saulat Sarfraz Professor of Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Maaza Javed Department of Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Hafiz Abad Mahmood Department of Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Abdullah Javed Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zaid CMH, Rawalakot, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1067

Keywords:

Rotator Cuff Tears, Ultrasound, MRI, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain, significantly affecting mobility and quality of life. Accurate and cost-effective diagnostic methods are essential, particularly in resource-limited settings. While MRI is considered the gold standard, the role of ultrasound in diagnosing rotator cuff tears remains under investigation, with its performance varying across different studies and populations. Objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in terms of sensitivity and specificity for detection of rotator cuff tears keeping MRI as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from July 2024 to January 2025 at the Department of Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Methodology: A total of 130 patients aged 18–60 years, presenting with suspected rotator cuff tears, were enrolled. Ultrasound was performed using a 10 MHz linear probe, and MRI was conducted on a 1.5T machine. Full- and partial-thickness tears were diagnosed based on established imaging criteria. Metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the overall effectiveness of ultrasound in diagnosis were assessed. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.32 ± 7.06 years, with 70% male representation and right-sided tears being more prevalent (73.1%). Ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 91%, and diagnostic accuracy of 92%. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a reliable, cost-effective diagnostic modality for rotator cuff tears, with accuracy comparable to MRI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Song A, Cannon D, Kim P, Ayers GD, Gao C, Giri A, et al. Risk factors for degenerative, symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(4):806-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.006.

Akhtar A, Richards J, Monga P. The biomechanics of the rotator cuff in health and disease: a narrative review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;18:150-6. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.019.

Abdelwahab A, Ahuja N, Iyengar KP, Jain VK, Bakti N, Singh B. Traumatic rotator cuff tears: current concepts in diagnosis and management. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;18:51-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.013.

Zhou T, Han C, Weng X. Present situation and development prospects of the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears. Front Surg. 2023;10:857821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.857821.

Altamimi TA, Alkathami AA, Al-Awn RMM, Alkhaldi MHE, Alhudaithi MHM, Alqahtani AA, et al. A narrative review of rotator cuff tear management: surgery versus conservative treatment. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e74988. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74988.

Gowda CS, Mirza K, Galagali DA. Rotator cuff tears: correlation between clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56065. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56065.

Balevi Batur E, Bekin Sarıkaya PZ, Kaygısız ME, Albayrak Gezer I, Levendoglu F. Diagnostic dilemma: which clinical tests are most accurate for diagnosing supraspinatus muscle tears and tendinosis when compared to magnetic resonance imaging? Cureus. 2022;14(6):e25903. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25903.

Nunna B Jr, Parihar P, Wanjari M, Shetty N, Bora N. High-resolution imaging insights into shoulder joint pain: a comprehensive review of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cureus. 2023;15(11):e48974. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48974.

Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein JM. Low-field MRI: clinical promise and challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023;57(1):25-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28408.

Xin Ooi MW, Fenning L, Dhir V, Basu S. Rotator cuff assessment on imaging. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;18:121-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.004.

Madhavi P, Patil P. Diagnostic accuracy of USG and MRI for the detection of rotator cuff injury. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e68199. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68199.

Mohtasib RS, Alzahrani AM, Asiri YN, Rayes ZF, Alshaalan MA. Accuracy of shoulder ultrasound examination for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Saudi Med. 2019;39(3):162-71. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.162.

Farooqi AS, Lee A, Novikov D, Kelly AM, Li X, Kelly JD 4th, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10):23259671211035106. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211035106.

Ganesh J, Patil SD, Muchchandi R, Naik S. Diagnostic comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting rotator cuff tears: a study conducted in the population of Vijayapura. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e68302. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68302.

Nadeem RD, Yousaf KR, Yusuf MT, Akhtar M, Nagshband MS, Ahmed I, et al. Accuracy of high-resolution ultrasonography for diagnosis of rotator cuff tears considering magnetic resonance imaging as gold standard. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2021;27(2):234-8. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v27i2.4552

Akhtar M, Noor A, Ashfaq M, Ashfaq T, Shah ZR. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound findings for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023;73(1):231-4. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i1.5267

Selvaraj S, Sen KK, Das SK, Das S, Saha S, Datta S. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound vs. MRI in evaluation of rotator cuff injuries. Int J Radiol Diagn Imaging. 2019;2(2):92-5. https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2019.v2.i2b.45

Yazigi Junior JA, Nicolao FA, Matsumaga FT, da Costa RN, Cohen M, Neto RB. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in diagnosing supraspinatus lesions. Sao Paulo Med J. 2018;136(4):292-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0069170418

Gupta A, Nayak SR, Bahinipati P. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in rotator cuff and associated non-rotator cuff pathologies. J Res Pract Musculoskelet Syst. 2022;6(3):72-82. https://doi.org/10.22540/jrpms-06-072

Okoroha KR, Fidai MS, Tramer JS, Davis KD, Kolowich PA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonography. 2019;38(3):215-20. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18058

Downloads

Published

2025-04-20

How to Cite

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Terms of Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection of Rotator Cuff Tears Keeping MRI as Gold Standard. (2025). Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(4), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1067