Accuracy of MRI in Predicting Circumferential Resection Margin and Mesorectal Fascia Involvement for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Keeping Operative Findings as a Gold Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1897Keywords:
Rectal Cancer, MRI, Circumferential Resection Margin, Mesorectal Fascia, Diagnostic Accuracy.Abstract
Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer requires precise preoperative staging in order to allow perioperative planning and the best oncological outcomes. MRI has become the norm in the evaluation of circumferential resection margin and involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Thorough analysis of these parameters assists in the decision regarding neoadjuvant therapy and provides an estimate of the risk for local recurrence. Objective: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the circumferential resection margin involvement and mesorectal fascia involvement for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, while using operative findings as the gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from June to November 2024 at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Methodology: A total of 200 patients aged 20–70 years undergoing surgery for rectal carcinoma were enrolled. High-resolution pelvic MRI was performed using a 1.5T scanner, and findings regarding CRM and MRF involvement were recorded. Surgical assessment served as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.23 ± 9.22 years with a mean symptom duration of 6.50 ± 3.08 months. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.90%, specificity of 90.70%, and diagnostic accuracy of 89.00%. PPV and NPV were 83.60% and 92.10%, respectively. Diagnostic performance was higher in females (96.00% accuracy), younger patients (≤40 years), and those with shorter symptom duration (≤6 months). Conclusion: MRI is a highly accurate and reliable modality for preoperative assessment of CRM and mesorectal fascia involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Downloads
References
staging, imaging techniques, and management. RadioGraphics, 39(2), 367-387.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180114
5. Pang, X., Xie, P., Yu, L., Chen, H., Zheng, J., Meng, X., & Wan, X. (2022). A new magnetic resonance imaging tumour response grading scheme for locally advanced rectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 127(2), 268-277.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01801-x
6. Awawda, M., Taha, T., Salman, S., Billan, S., & Hijab, A. (2022). The evolving treatment paradigm of locally advanced rectal cancer: A narrative review. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 13(4), 2033-2047.
https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-13
7. Vălean, D., Zaharie, R., Țaulean, R., Usatiuc, L., & Zaharie, F. (2024). Recent trends in non-invasive methods of diagnosis and evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: A short review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(4), 2077.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042077
8. Zhao, M., Feng, L., Zhao, K., Cui, Y., Li, Z., Ke, C., Yang, X., Qiu, Q., Lu, W., Liang, Y., Xie, C., Wan, X., & Liu, Z. (2023). An MRI-based scoring system for pretreatment risk stratification in locally advanced rectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 129(7), 1095-1104.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02384-x
9. Bhutiani, N., Peacock, O., & Chang, G. J. (2022). A practical framework for the targeted use of total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Cancer, 128(11), 2064-2072.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34149
10. Jayaprakasam, V. S., Alvarez, J., Omer, D. M., Gollub, M. J., Smith, J. J., & Petkovska, I. (2023). Watch-and-Wait approach to rectal cancer: The role of imaging. Radiology, 307(1).
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221529
11. Horvat, N., El Homsi, M., Miranda, J., Mazaheri, Y., Gollub, M. J., & Paroder, V. (2022). Rectal MRI interpretation after neoadjuvant therapy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 57(2), 353-369.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28426
12. Redebrandt, H. N., Brandt, C., Hawran, S., & Bendix, T. (2022). Clinical evaluation versus magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with radicular arm pain—A pragmatic study. Health Science Reports, 5(3).
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.589
13. Miranda, J., Causa Andrieu, P., Nincevic, J., Gomes de Farias, L. D., Khasawneh, H., Arita, Y., Stanietzky, N., Fernandes, M. C., De Castria, T. B., & Horvat, N. (2023). Advances in MRI-based assessment of rectal cancer post-neoadjuvant therapy: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 172.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010172
14. Sim, K. C., Park, B. J., Kim, M. J., Sung, D. J., Han, N. Y., Han, Y. E., Kwak, J., & An, H. (2021). Accuracy of MRI for predicting anterior peritoneal reflection involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer: A comparison with operative findings. Abdominal Radiology, 47(2), 508-516.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03356-6
15. Jung, E. J., Ryu, C. G., Kim, G., Kim, S. R., Nam, S. E., Park, H. S., Kim, Y. J., & Hwang, D. (2012). Is rectal MRI beneficial for determining the location of rectal cancer with respect to the peritoneal reflection? Radiology and Oncology, 46(4).
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0038-7
16. Rehman, M., Nawab, K., Anjum, H., & Gul, H. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of depth of tumor invasion (T staging) and mesorectal fascia involvement in carcinoma rectum. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute, 33(2).
https://www.jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/2406
17. Saeed, S., Muhammad, A., Akhtar, N., Adil, Z., & Majid, A. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in mesorectal fascial involvement. Journal of Rehman Medical Institute, 8(2), 19-22.
https://doi.org/10.52442/jrmi.v8i2.424
18. Naz, N., Azmatullah, U., Ali, A., Majid, & Ahmed, A. (2021). To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting rectal cancer, keeping histopathology as a gold standard. International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research, 9(3), 365-370.
https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v9.i3.2021.365-370
19. Opara, C. O., Khan, F. Y., Kabiraj, G., Kauser, H., Palakeel, J. J., Ali, M., Chaduvula, P., Chhabra, S., Lamsal Lamichhane, S., Ramesh, V., & Mohammed, L. (2022). The value of magnetic resonance imaging and Endorectal ultrasound for the accurate preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30499
20. Memon, A. I., Naz, S., Jalees, U., Bhatti, A. M., Khan, R., & Zeb, M. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting the preoperative tumor staging of colorectal carcinoma. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 176-180.
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.386
21. Yasemin, S. D. (2016). Accuracy of MR imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 69(3), 173-179.
https://doi.org/10.1501/tipfak_0000000940
22. Sunitha, R, Anandaraja, P, Balabharathi, M, & Murugaesan R. (2025). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in staging of carcinoma rectum. Int J Acad Med Pharm, 7(1), 749-754.
https://academicmed.org/Uploads/Volume7Issue1/147.%20[4698.%20JAMP_Mohamed%20Ali_QR]%20749-754.pdf
23. Zhuang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wei, M., Yang, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the accuracy of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.709070
24. De La Pinta, C., Martín, M., Sempere, C., Hervás, A., Fernández-lizarbe, E., López, F., & Sancho, S. (2019). Magnetic resonance imaging value to predict pathologic staging in locally advanced rectal cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease, 29(1), 39-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
