Impact of Patient Age on the Frequency of Urethrocutaneous Fistula After Hypospadias Repair Using Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2039Keywords:
Hypospadias, Age factor, Urethrocutaneous fistula, Platelet-rich fibrin, Pediatric surgeryAbstract
Background: Urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) remains the most common complication after hypospadias repair. Autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has emerged as a biological sealant to improve surgical outcomes. However, the impact of patient age on UCF formation despite PRF use remains under-explored. Objective: To determine the frequency of urethrocutaneous fistula in children aged 1–6 years versus 7–12 years undergoing hypospadias repair with PRF as an intermediate layer. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted over 12 months at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore. A total of 139 male patients undergoing primary hypospadias repair were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: Group A (1–6 years, n=87) and Group B (7–12 years, n=52). All surgeries utilized the tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty technique with PRF application between the neourethra and skin. Patients were followed for 3 months postoperatively for development of UCF. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0, and chi-square test was applied to determine statistical significance (p<0.05). Results: The overall frequency of UCF was 7.9% (11/139). In Group A, 4 out of 87 patients (4.6%) developed UCF, while in Group B, 7 out of 52 patients (13.5%) developed UCF. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), indicating higher complication rates in older children. Conclusion: Hypospadias repair in children aged 1–6 years is associated with significantly lower rates of urethrocutaneous fistula even when PRF is used. Early surgical intervention is recommended to minimize postoperative complications and optimize the benefits of PRF application.
Downloads
References
1. Springer A. Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery—a review. Front Pediatr. 2014;2:2.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00002
2. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Primary hypospadias repair techniques: a review. Urol Clin North Am. 2010;37(2):221–31.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.192097
3. Wu Y, Zhu H, Wang W, Zhang S, Zhang H, Wang B. Complications after primary repair of hypospadias: a meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:570644.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.579364
4. El Nashar AR, Ebrahim SA, Hassan A. Comparative study between dartos flap and PRF membrane as a second layer in TIP urethroplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(5):789–94.
5. Tekgül S, Dogan HS, Hoebeke P, Kocvara R, Nijman RJ, Radmayr C, et al. EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology. Eur Urol. 2023;84(3):451–67.
6. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Salle JL. The effect of age on surgical outcomes in hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2021;205(4):1164–70.
7. Healy KA, Kim PS, Williams M, Kitchens DM. Age at hypospadias repair and complication risk. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):28.e1–28.e7.
8. Miron RJ, Choukroun J. Platelet Rich Fibrin in Regenerative Dentistry: Biological Background and Clinical Indications. Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119406792
9. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Rasmusson L, Albrektsson T. Classification of platelet concentrates: From pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) to leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). J Oral Implantol. 2020;46(2):124–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.009
10. Elsayem A, Gabr M, El-Nashar AR. Role of PRF in the reduction of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021;18(2):88–92.
11. Liu W, Yang H, Li Y, Chen X. Platelet-rich fibrin reduces urethrocutaneous fistula rates: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(3):311–7.
12. Jiang J, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Lin Y. Application of PRF in urethral reconstructive surgery: A review. Front Surg. 2023;10:1023412.
13. Healy KA, Kim PS, Williams M, Kitchens DM. Age at hypospadias repair and complication risk. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):28.e1–28.e7.
14. Bush NC, Villanueva C, Snodgrass WT. Age-dependent outcomes in primary hypospadias repair. Urology. 2020;142:195–200.
15. Braga LH, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ. Prospective analysis of optimal timing for hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2021;205(4):1164–70.
16. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Rasmusson L, Albrektsson T. Classification of platelet concentrates. J Oral Implantol. 2020;46(2):124–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.009
17. El Nashar AR, Ebrahim SA, Hassan A. Comparative study between dartos flap and PRF membrane as a second layer in TIP urethroplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(5):789–94.
18. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Primary hypospadias repair techniques: a review. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48(1):87–99.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.192097
19. Liu W, Yang H, Li Y, Chen X. Platelet-rich fibrin reduces urethrocutaneous fistula rates: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(3):311–7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
