Comparative Study to Evaluate Vaginal Versus Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion

Authors

  • Uzma Amjid Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Saeeda Safi Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Shahzadi Neelum Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Faiza Fayyaz Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Faiza Fayyaz Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Naila Rehman Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.
  • Javeria Saleem Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2153

Keywords:

Missed Abortion, Vaginal Misoprostol, Oral Misoprostol, Efficacy

Abstract

Background: Missed abortion of the first trimester is a common obstetric complication, usually needing medical intervention. Misoprostol, the prostaglandin E1 analogue, can be given by different routes, most frequently the oral and vaginal routes. Establishing the more efficacious route can help enhance the result of the treatment and the patient's satisfaction. Objective: To compare vaginal versus oral prostaglandin e1 analogue (misoprostol) in management of first trimester missed abortion in term of efficacy. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Duration and Place of Study: The study was carried out from September 2024 to February 2025 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera. Methodology: A total of 194 women aged 18–35 years with ultrasound-confirmed first trimester missed abortion were recruited and randomized into two equal groups. Group A received 400 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol every three hours (maximum three doses), while Group B received 400 micrograms of oral misoprostol every six hours (maximum three doses). Treatment was considered successful if complete uterine evacuation occurred without surgical intervention and follow-up ultrasound on day three confirmed absence of intrauterine products ≥15 mm. Results: The mean age was 26.63 ± 3.65 years in Group A and 27.04 ± 4.05 years in Group B. Vaginal misoprostol achieved a significantly higher success rate (87.6%) compared to oral misoprostol (64.9%) (p=0.001). Stratified analyses demonstrated consistently better outcomes with vaginal administration across subgroups including age, residence, educational level, socioeconomic status, gestational age, parity, and gravidity. Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol demonstrated superior efficacy with fewer adverse effects than oral administration for managing first-trimester missed abortion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Gluck, O., Barber, E., Friedman, M., Feldstein, O., Tal, O., Grinstein, E., Mizrachi, Y., Kerner, R., Saidian, M., Menasherof, M., & Sagiv, R. (2023). Failure rate of medical treatment for miscarriage correlated with the difference between gestational age according to last menstrual period and gestational size calculated via ultrasound. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(19), 6112.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196112

2. Khaskheli, M., Baloch, D. S., Baloch, D. A., & Shah, S. G. (2021). Vaginal discharge during pregnancy and associated adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(5).

https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.5.4187

3. Acharya, A., Prabhu, A., Negi, S., Sharma, K., Dwivedi, R., & Athe, R. (2023). Spontaneous miscarriage/abortion in the first trimester and expectant management – a meta-analysis approach. Menopausal Review, 22(3), 135-141.

https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.131307

4. Dudhe, S. S., Waghulkar, S., Mishra, G. V., Parihar, P., & Nimodia, D. (2024). A rare occurrence of uterine perforation following the dilation and curettage for missed abortion. Cureus, 16(9).

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70079

5. Hayes-Ryan, D., Cooley, S., & Cleary, B. (2021). Medical management of first trimester miscarriage: A quality improvement initiative. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 31(1), 70-72.

https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002840

6. Hamel, C., Coppus, S., Van den Berg, J., Hink, E., Van Seeters, J., Van Kesteren, P., Merién, A., Torrenga, B., Van de Laar, R., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, J., Gaugler-Senden, I., Graziosi, P., Van Rumste, M., Nelissen, E., Vandenbussche, F., & Snijders, M. (2021). Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial. EClinicalMedicine, 32, 100716.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100716

7. Vorontsova, Y., Haas, D. M., Flannery, K., Masters, A. R., Silva, L. L., Pierson, R. C., Yeley, B., Hogg, G., Guise, D., Heathman, M., & Quinney, S. K. (2022). Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term. Clinical and Translational Science, 15(8), 1937-1945.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13306

8. Kerr, R. S., Kumar, N., Williams, M. J., Cuthbert, A., Aflaifel, N., Haas, D. M., & Weeks, A. D. (2021). Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(6).

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd014484

9. Silva, T. M., Araujo, M. A., Simões, A. C., Oliveira, R. D., Medeiros, K. S., Sarmento, A. C., Medeiros, R. D., Costa, A. P., & Gonçalves, A. K. (2023). Efficacy, safety, and acceptability of Misoprostol in the treatment of incomplete miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics, 45(12), e808-e817.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776029

10. on Childbirth, N. S. C., on High-Risk, N. S. C., & on Urgency, N. S. C. (2023). Misoprostol use in obstetrics: Number 6–June 2023. RBGO Gynecology & Obstetrics, 45(6), 356.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10621739/

11. Meister, L., Künnemann, I., Fettke, F., Lux, A., & Ignatov, A. (2024). Medical treatment of miscarriage using misoprostol—a retrospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 310(4), 2115-2121.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07628-6

12. Atuhairwe, S., Byamugisha, J., Kakaire, O., Hanson, C., Cleeve, A., Klingberg-Allvin, M., Tumwesigye, N. M., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2022). Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives and physicians: A randomised, controlled, equivalence trial in Uganda. The Lancet Global Health, 10(10), e1505-e1513.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00312-6

13. Marwah, S. (2016). A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal vs oral prostaglandin E 1 analogue (Misoprostol) in management of first trimester missed abortion. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH.

https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/18178.7891

14. Aman, A., Shinwari, L., Rahim, R., Syed, M., & Nawaz, R. (2022). Efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol in the management of first trimester incomplete miscarriage. The Professional Medical Journal, 29(03), 372-376.

https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2022.29.03.6513

15. Abdou, A. M., Ahmed, T. A., Abd elhafez, M. A., & Zayton, M. M. (2023). Study of oral versus vaginal Misoprostol in the management of early pregnancy loss. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 91(1), 4967-4971.

https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2023.301773

16. Abid T, Sultana S, Khatun N, Kulsum U, Rumpa FY. (2025). Vaginal versus oral misoprostol in the management of first trimester missed abortion among admitted patients in a tertiary level hospital. Ann Int Med Dent Res, 11(2), 35-42.

https://doi.org/10.53339/aimdr.2025.11.2.1

17. Kafil, N., & Arain, F. R. (2017). Comparison of efficacy of vaginal vs oral prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) in management of first trimester missed abortion. In Medical Forum Monthly, 28(11), 45-49.

https://medicalforummonthly.com/index.php/mfm/article/view/4282

18. Majeed, F., Al-Ani, H., & Salih jasim, S. (2023). Comparison between different dose regimens of misoprostol in termination of early pregnancy. Tikrit Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(1), 41-51.

https://doi.org/10.25130/tjphs.2019.14.1.5.41.51

19. Roshan, N., Bibi, N., Ghafoor, M., & Anbreen, F. (2023). A comparative study to assess the efficacy and safety of prostaglandin-E1 Analogue (Misoprostol) given oral vs vaginal in the management of first trimester missed abortion. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan, 13(3), 261-266.

https://www.jsogp.net/index.php/jsogp/article/view/683

20. Saeed, S., Manzoor, R. U. K. H. S. A. N. A., Tazion, S., Butt, F., & Badar, N. (2018). Misoprostol for 1st trimester miscarriage: efficacy of vaginal versus oral misoprostol. Pak J Med Health Sci, 12(2), 849-52.

21. Mahjabeen, K. N., & Rehman, R. (2009). Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 19(6), 359-62.

https://jcpsp.pk/archive/2009/Jun2009/08.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Amjid, U., Safi, S., Neelum, S., Fayyaz, F., Fayyaz, F., Rehman, N., & Saleem, J. (2025). Comparative Study to Evaluate Vaginal Versus Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 981-986. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2153