Outcomes of Septoplasty Using Mesh Cartilage in Terms of Patient Satisfaction

Authors

  • Israr Ud Din Department of ENT, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Aizaz Ahmad Department of ENT, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2191

Keywords:

mesh cartilage, septoplasty, nasal obstruction, patient satisfaction, polycaprolactone.

Abstract

Nasal airway obstruction is a common complaint in otolaryngology, frequently caused by nasal septum deviation. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction following septoplasty using mesh cartilage, a bioabsorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) implant designed to provide structural support and promote tissue regeneration. A descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Khyber Peshawar Teaching Hospital, 10 September 2024 to 10 March 2025. Seventy-seven patients aged between 20-60 years old who were having mesh cartilage septoplasty were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Demographic and clinical data were noted and postoperative satisfaction evaluated. Analysis of data was done using SPSS 22.0, and chi-square test was used to perform stratification work. The average age was 37.8 +- 10.2 years, and 59.7% of them were male. Patient satisfaction after surgery was found to be 90.9 percent, and there was no significant correlation between the satisfaction and age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and obesity (p > 0.05). The high satisfaction level justifies the effectiveness of mesh cartilage in producing positive functional and structural stability, regardless of prevalent comorbidities. This method could lower morbidity of the donor site and operation time than autologous grafts. However, its application in severely contracted noses remains limited due to potential complications like extrusion or infection during the absorption period. Larger multicenter controlled studies are recommended to further evaluate long-term outcomes, revision rates, and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lepley, T. J., Frusciante, R. P., Malik, J., Farag, A., Otto, B. A., & Zhao, K. (2023). Otolaryngologists’ radiological assessment of nasal septum deviation symptomatology. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 280(1), 235-240.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07528-y

2. Raithatha, R., & Del Signore, A. (2023). Prevalence and Identification of Nasal Airway Obstruction in Patients Presenting to Otolaryngology Clinics: Results from a Large Descriptive Practice Survey. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 01455613231196670.

https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613231196670

3. Dąbrowska-Bień J, Skarżyński PH, Gwizdalska I, Łazęcka K, Skarżyński H. Complications in septoplasty based on a large group of 5639 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(7):1789-94.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4990-8

4. Lina, I. A., & Williams, M. F. (2023). Otolaryngology (Ear Nose and Throat). In Managing Emergencies in the Outpatient Setting: Pearls for Primary Care (pp. 165-184). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15270-2_8

5. Ali, H. M., Zavala, H., Chinnadurai, S., & Roby, B. (2021). Nasal septal hematoma in children: Time to diagnosis and resulting complications. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 145, 110734.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110734

6. Jin HR, Kim DW, Jung HJ. Common sites, etiology, and solutions of persistent septal deviation in revision septoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2018;11(4):288-92.

https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2017.01788

7. Bernichi, J. V., Rizzo, V. L., Villa, J. F., Santos, R. F., & Caparroz, F. A. (2021). Rhinogenic and sinus headache–Literature review. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 42(6), 103113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103113

8. Kim, D. H., Kim, S. W., & Hwang, S. H. (2023). Efficacy and safety of endoscopic septoplasty for treating nasal septal deviations compared with conventional septoplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Otolaryngology, 48(2), 108-121.

https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14021

9. Lee, D. J., Jo, H., Kwon, H. N., Park, J. H., Kim, S. D., & Cho, K. S. (2022). Causes and management of persistent septal deviation after septoplasty. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 19574.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23772-y

10. Tao F, Feng Y, Sun B, Wang J, Chen X, Gong J. Septoplasty Effect on the Enhancement of Airflow Distribution and Particle Deposition in Nasal Cavity: A Numerical Study. Healthcare. 2022;10(9):1702-8.

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091702

11. McGrath M, Bell E, Locketz GD, Becker DG. Review and update on extracorporeal septoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;27(1):1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000000509

12. Mutlu V. A novel surgical technique: Crushed septal cartilage graft application in endonasal septoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019;46(2):218-22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2018.08.001

13. Baser, B., Surana, P., Singh, P., & Patidar, M. (2021). Caudal septal deviation: new classification and management strategy. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 73(4), 424-430.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01909-7

14. Spataro EA, Saltychev M, Kandathil CK, Most SP. Outcomes of Extracorporeal Septoplasty and Its Modifications in Treatment of Severe L-Strut Septal Deviation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(6):542-50.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.1020

15. Lee, S. H., Cho, J., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Long-term outcomes of secondary nasal tip plasty after degradation of a polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 46(5), 2358-2365.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02839-1

16. Lee K, An HG, Kim J, In SM. Effectiveness of the TnR Nasal Mesh® for the Correction of Caudal Septal Deviation. J Clin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;31(2):205-11.

https://doi.org/10.35420/jcohns.2020.31.2.205

17. Yap E. Techniques in the Safe Use of Polycaprolactone in Structural Rhinoplasty. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;35(1):66-70.

https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v35i1.1267

18. Kim JN, Choi HG, Kim SH, Park HJ, Shin DH, Jo DI, et al. The efficacy of bioabsorbable mesh as an internal splint in primary septoplasty. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39(5):561-4.

https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.561

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Israr Ud Din, & Ahmad, A. (2025). Outcomes of Septoplasty Using Mesh Cartilage in Terms of Patient Satisfaction. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 996-999. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2191