Comparison of Nitroglycerin and Nifedipine in Preterm Labour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.2337Keywords:
Calcium channel blockers, Nitroglycerin, Nifedipine, Preterm labour, Tocolysis.Abstract
Background: Preterm labour, defined as the onset of persistent uterine contractions leading to cervical dilatation before 37 weeks of gestation, remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Effective tocolytic therapy is essential to delay delivery, allowing interventions such as antenatal corticosteroids to enhance fetal lung maturity. Nitroglycerin and nifedipine are commonly used tocolytic agents, yet comparative data in local healthcare settings are limited. Objective: To compare the efficacy of nitroglycerin patch and oral nifedipine in the management of preterm labour. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Duration and Place of Study: The study was conducted from August 2024 to January 2025 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. Methodology: A total of 120 women aged 18–40 years with singleton pregnancies at 24–36 weeks gestation were randomized into nitroglycerin patch (n=60) or oral nifedipine (n=60) groups. Efficacy was defined as prolongation of pregnancy for at least 48 hours from onset of preterm labour. Maternal and fetal monitoring was performed throughout the intervention. Results: Oral nifedipine demonstrated higher efficacy (90.0%) compared to nitroglycerin patches (76.7%), though the overall difference was not statistically significant (p=0.299). Stratified analysis indicated significantly improved outcomes with nifedipine in women over 30 years of age (100% vs 60%, p=0.026). Conclusion: Both agents are effective for preterm labour management, with oral nifedipine showing superior efficacy, particularly in older women, supporting its use as a reliable first-line tocolytic.
Downloads
References
1. Breuking S, Oudijk MA, van Eekelen R, de Boer MA, Pajkrt E, Hermans F. Assessment of cervical softening and the prediction of preterm birth (STIPP): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(11):e071597.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071597
2. Tantengco OAG, Menon R. Breaking down the barrier: the role of cervical infection and inflammation in preterm birth. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;2:777643.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.777643
3. Don EE, Landman AJEMC, Vissers G, Jordanova ES, Post Uiterweer ED, de Groot CJM, et al. Uterine fibroids causing preterm birth: a new pathophysiological hypothesis on the role of fibroid necrosis and inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8064.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158064
4. Rees P, Gale C, Battersby C, Williams C, Carter B, Sutcliffe A. Intraventricular hemorrhage and survival, multimorbidity, and neurodevelopment. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2452883.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52883
5. Gaikwad V, Gaikwad S, Tiwari P. Efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin patch for the arrest of preterm labor: a retrospective study. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e59982. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59982
6. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Transdermal nitroglycerin for the treatment of preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):551.e1-551.e18. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.022
7. Çalışkan Ş, Narin MA, Dede FS, Narin R, Dede H, Kandemir Ö. Glyceryl trinitrate for the treatment of preterm labor. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(3):174-8.
https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2015.15016
8. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Kusanovic JP. Nifedipine in the management of preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):134.e1-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.038
9. Songthamwat S, Na Nan C, Songthamwat M. Effectiveness of nifedipine in threatened preterm labor: a randomized trial. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:317-23.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S159062
10. Aggarwal A, Bagga R, Girish B, Kalra J, Kumar P. Effect of maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine in established preterm labour on pregnancy prolongation and neonatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(2):177-84.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1331340
11. Goyal N, Agrawal M, Dewani D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of transdermal nitroglycerine patches and oral nifedipine in prolongation of pregnancy in women with preterm labour. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39106.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39106
12. Kaur P, Madan A, Sharma S. A comparative study of transdermal nitroglycerine patch and oral nifedipine in preterm labor. Ann Afr Med. 2021;20:31–36.
https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_11_20
13. Ishaq N, Ishaq Z, Mushtaq A, et al. Comparative study of tocolytic efficacy of nifedipine and nitroglycerine. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2017;7(2):96–100.
14. Gilani SUA, Ali SM, Ahmad UR, et al. To compare efficacy of nifedipine and nitroglycerine as tocolytic agent in preterm labor patients. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2014;8(1):80–82.
15. Akhtar Z, Amna B, Qamar S, et al. Compare the effectiveness of transdermal nitro-glycerine versus oral nifedipine for acute tocolysis in preterm labour. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(4):2030–2032.
16. Jamil M, Abid R, Basharat A, Kharunisa. Transdermal nitro-glycerine versus oral nifedipine for acute tocolysis in preterm labour: a randomised controlled trial. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2020;10(1):26–29.
17. Kaur M, Goel B, Singh J. Comparative study of nitroglycerin dermal patch versus nifedipine in the management of preterm labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(10):4243–48.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184160
18. Zamani M, Alimi R, Arabi SM, Moradi M, Azmoude E. Comparison of the efficacy of nifedipine with ritodrine, nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate for the management of preterm labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24:318.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06497-w
19. Zulfiqar S, Zulfiqar S, Khan SM. Comparison of nitroglycerine patch and nifedipine in treatment of preterm labour. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll. 2016;7(2):965–967
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.