Fetomaternal Morbidity and Adhesions after Repeat Caesarean Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2511Keywords:
Repeat Caesarean Section, Adhesions, Fetomaternal Morbidity, Operative Complications, Obstetric Surgery, VBAC.Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most commonly performed obstetric procedures worldwide. With the increasing rate of repeat CS, postoperative adhesions have emerged as a major surgical challenge, potentially increasing maternal morbidity and affecting fetal outcomes. Understanding the extent and impact of adhesions can guide preventive strategies and improve surgical planning in obstetric practice. Objective: To assess the prevalence and severity of intra-abdominal adhesions and their association with fetomaternal morbidity in women undergoing repeat caesarean sections at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences for Women (PUMHS), Nawabshah for the duration of six months, from May 2024 to November 2024. Women undergoing repeat caesarean sections were enrolled after informed consent. Intraoperative findings were documented, including the presence, type, and extent of adhesions, using a standardized adhesion scoring system. Maternal outcomes such as surgical difficulty, blood loss, operative time, and intra/postoperative complications were recorded. Fetal outcomes including birth weight, Apgar score, and neonatal ICU admission were analyzed. Data were evaluated using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Among the studied women, a high prevalence of adhesions was observed, with dense adhesions in a significant proportion of repeat CS cases. Adhesions were strongly associated with prolonged operative time, increased intraoperative bleeding, and greater surgical difficulty. Fetomaternal morbidity, including wound infection, postpartum hemorrhage, and transient neonatal distress, was notably higher in women with severe adhesions. Conclusion: Adhesions after repeat caesarean sections contribute substantially to surgical and postoperative complications. Careful surgical technique, meticulous tissue handling, and the use of adhesion prevention measures can reduce future morbidity. Patient counseling regarding risks of repeat CS and promoting vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) where appropriate may help mitigate this growing concern.
Downloads
References
1. Alshehri KA, et al. Outcomes and complications after repeat cesarean. PMC [Internet]. 2019.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6690310/
2. Clark EAS, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011;205(6 Suppl):S2–10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.028
3. Mooij R, et al. Association between surgical technique, adhesions and … PMC [Internet]. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03229-8
4. Poole JH. Adhesions Following Cesarean Delivery: A Review. Women’s Health (Lond) [Internet]. 2013;9(4):365–71.
https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.13.45
5. Nuamah MA, et al. Prevalence of adhesions and associated postoperative complications after cesarean section. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2017;14(1):147.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0388-0
6. National Institutes of Health. Menopause: Early or Premature. NIH [Internet]. 2022.
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/menopause/conditioninfo/early
7. Amjad A, et al. Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2020; 17:162.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03457-y
8. Tabassum S. Primary Caesarean Section: A Gateway to Repeat Surgery. Pak J Health Sci [Internet]. 2025;6(1):44–8.
https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i5.2941
9. Iffet S. Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Higher Order Caesarean Section. Pak J Med Dent [Internet]. 2024;13(2):57–61.
https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd13-2/004
10. Akrm U, Khan S, Khalil AA, et al. High Order Cesarean Section: Is It Associated With More … Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2023;73(3):798–801.
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.8886
11. Jauniaux E, et al. FIGO classification for placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2019;146(1):20–4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30548836/
12. Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017; 377:2438–9.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.006
13. Diamond MP, et al. Adhesion-related complications after repeat abdominal surgery. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 2012;18(5):485–94. Available Betrán AP, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671.
https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/6/e005671
14. Nisa QU, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) in patients with one prior CS: low TOLAC uptake but reasonable success. KJMS. 2019;12(1): [insert page numbers]. https://kjms.com.pk/old/sites/default/files/KJMS-11%285%29.pdf
15. Tulandi T, Lyell DJ. Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(1):1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60211-8
16. Silver RM, Branch DW. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:1529-1536.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp1709324
17. Werner EF, et al. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):522.e1-522.e9.
https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(21)00667-0/fulltext
18. The NICE Guideline on Menopause: Diagnosis and Management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2019.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng23
19. Hofberg K, Ward MR. Fear of pregnancy and childbirth. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2004;6:122-124.
https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.79.935.505
20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e127.
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003078
Ten Broek RPG, et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2014;383(9911):48-59.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.