Comparison of Envelope and Modified Triangular Flaps on Incidence of Dry Socket after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2668Keywords:
Dry Socket, Mandibular third molar, Surgical flapsAbstract
Objectives: To compare the incidence of dry socket between envelope and modified triangular flaps in patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 30 Military Dental Centre, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, and Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from December 2022 to November 2024. Methods: A total of 94 patients aged 18-50 years undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included and allocated to two equal groups. Patients in Group EF received an envelope flap created by an intersulcular incision from the first to second molar, extending onto the ramus and laterally diverging distal to the third molar in order to protect the lingual nerve. In Group MTF; a modified triangular flap was created with an incision from the ramus ridge to 2 mm distal to the second molar, then extended into the buccal vestibule while preserving a thin gingival collar around the second molar. Patients were evaluated on postoperative day 3 for the development of dry socket, diagnosed by the presence of exposed alveolar bone and pain score> 7 on visual analogue scale. Chi-square test applied to compare the primary outcomes between the two groups. Results: The mean age of participants was 30.6±6.5 years, with a higher male population (66%). No statistically significant difference was reported between the Group EF and Group MTF regarding the incidence of dry socket (19.2% Vs 17%, p-value= 0.79). Conclusion: Both envelope and modified triangular flap methods demonstrate a comparable efficacy in preventing dry socket after mandibular third molar surgery.
Downloads
References
1. Waseem N, Asim MA, Maqsood A, Ghafoor MW, Khalid MO. Evaluation of patterns of impacted third molars and their association with vital structures by radiographic examination. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(1):255-60. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i1.3315.
2. Tassoker M. What are the risk factors for external root resorption of second molars associated with impacted third molars? A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(1):11-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.023
3. De Marco G, Lanza A, Cristache CM, Capcha EB, Espinoza KI, Rullo R, et al. The influence of flap design on patients’ experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021;29.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0932
4. Şimşek Kaya G, Yapıcı Yavuz G, Saruhan N. The influence of flap design on sequelae and quality of life following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A split‐mouth randomised clinical trial. J Oral rehabil. 2019;46(9):828-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12814
5. Mamoun J. Dry socket etiology, diagnosis, and clinical treatment techniques. J Korean Assoc of Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;44(2):52-8.
https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.52
6. Mohajerani H, Esmaeelinejad M, Jafari M, Amini E, Sharabiany SP. Comparison of Envelope and Modified Triangular Flaps on Incidence of Dry Socket after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Double-blind, Split-mouth Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(7):836-41.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2344
7. Shah R, Davies R. Oral Flap Design. [Updated 2024 Dec 27]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK610687/
8. Tarakji B, Saleh LA, Umair A, Azzeghaiby SN, Hanouneh S. Systemic review of dry socket: aetiology, treatment, and prevention. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):ZE10-3.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12422.5840.
9. Ahmad M, Khan ZA, Khan TU, Alqutub MN, Mokeem SA, AlMubarak AM, et al. Influence of Surgical Flap Design (Envelope and Szmyd) for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars on Clinical Periodontal Parameters: A Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4465.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094465.
10. Mudjono H, Rahajoe PS, Astuti ER. The effect of triangular and reversed triangular flap designs to post third molar odontectomy complications (a pilot study). J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(4):e327-e334.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55864.
11. Chen Y-W, Lee C-T, Hum L, Chuang S-K. Effect of flap design on periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(3):363-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.005
12. DE Marco G, Lanza A, Cristache CM, Capcha EB, Espinoza KI, Rullo R, et al. The influence of flap design on patients’ experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB. 2021;29:e20200932.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0932.
13. Bailey E, Kashbour W, Shah N, Worthington HV, Renton TF, Coulthard P. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD004345.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3.
14. Lopes da Silva BC, Machado GF, Primo Miranda EF, Galvão EL, Falci SGM. Envelope or triangular flap for surgical removal of third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(8):1073-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.01.001.
15. Rahman AU, Hashmi MJ, Sadiq MS, Ahmad F, Alam MA, Qadeer M. Comparison of wound healing using envelope and triangular flap for impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(10):2811-13.
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115102811.
16. Sridharan G, Nakkeeran KP, Andavan G, Raja V B KK. "Effects of flap modification on third molar extraction outcomes"-A randomised split mouth study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(4):619-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.08.010.
17. Jakse N, Bankaoglu V, Wimmer G, Eskici A, Pertl C. Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(1):7-12.
https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.119519.
18. Zhu J, Yuan X, Yan L, Li T, Guang M, Zhang Y. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Envelope and Triangular Flaps After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(4):515-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.026.
19. Xie Q, Wei S, Zhou N, Huang X. Modified envelope flap, a novel incision design, can relieve complications after extraction of fully horizontal impacted mandibular third molar. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):718-722.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
