Comparison of Ephedrine Versus Crystalloid Preload in Prevention of Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.2890Keywords:
Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Ephedrine, Hypotension, Pregnancy.Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery because it is simple, quick, and safe for both the mother and fetus compared with other methods like general anesthesia. However, maternal hypotension is the most common side effect experienced by a woman who has undergone spinal anesthesia for a cesarean delivery. Hypotension can cause distress and decreased uteroplacental perfusion. Several methods are used for prevention but their effectiveness is questionable. Objective: To compare the efficacy of ephedrine versus crystalloid preload in prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Duration and Place of Study: This study was conducted from 10 July 2024 to 10 January 2025 in the Department of Anesthesia, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Methodology: A total of 130 pregnant women aged 20 to 40 years undergoing elective cesarean section were included and randomly divided into two equal groups. One group received crystalloid preload while the other group received prophylactic ephedrine. Maternal blood pressure was monitored at regular intervals after spinal anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as blood pressure less than 100/60 millimeters of mercury. Chi square test were used with p value ≤0.05 considered significant. Results: Hypotension occurred in 35.4% patients in crystalloid group and 15.4% patients in ephedrine group showing significant difference with p value of 0.009. Conclusion: Ephedrine is more effective than crystalloid preload in preventing hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section.
Downloads
References
1. Ozden, M. G. (2023). Comparison of the effects of general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective analysis of data. Northern Clinics of Istanbul, 575-582.
https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.25593
2. Sung, T., Jee, Y. S., You, H., & Cho, C. (2021). Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 16(1), 49-55.
https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20072
3. Šklebar, I. (2019). Spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetrics: Prevention and therapy. Acta Clinica Croatica.
https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13
4. Patel, S., & Ninave, S. (2024). Postspinal anesthesia hypotension in caesarean delivery: A narrative review. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59232
5. Ibrahim, S. S., & Patil, B. (2024). A comparative study of infusion of ephedrine and Phenylephrine on hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69977
6. Kim, H., Kim, J. E., & Yu, T. (2023). Severe blood pressure elevation following ephedrine administration during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A CARE-compliant case report. Medicine, 102(9), e33130.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000033130
7. Yin, Y., Liu, C., Gao, G., Li, J., Long, X., Zhang, P., & Guo, W. (2022). Blood vessel assessment using computed tomography : Effects of ephedrine on uterine artery. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.890246
8. Park, H., & Choi, W. (2024). Use of vasopressors to manage spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 19(2), 85-93.
https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24037
9. Li, W., Huan, Y., Zhou, X., Zhou, S., Li, H., Wu, N., & Shen, F. (2026). Diagnostic accuracy of the Huawei watch D for measuring spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: A diagnostic test. Frontiers in Medicine, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1686637
10. Shang, Y., Li, H., Ma, J., Tan, L., Li, S., Li, P., Sheng, B., & Wang, R. (2021). Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Medicine, 100(7), e24607.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000024607
11. Chen, Y., Xu, X., Qin, R., Guo, L., & Ni, X. (2023). Comparison of crystalloid and colloid Co-load combined with norepinephrine prophylaxis on post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean delivery: A randomized sequential allocation dose-finding study. Frontiers in Medicine, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1214598
12. Hahn, R. G. (2023). Interstitial washdown during crystalloid fluid loading in graded hypovolemia –A retrospective analysis in volunteers. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 83(2), 105-116.
https://doi.org/10.3233/ch-221531
13. Mathew, M., Manah, Y. M., Ahuja, P., Shetty, A. R., Taye, T. E., Rajahram, V., Nalla, M., Sooklal, D., Metukuru, B. R., & Naveed, A. (2025). Managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean section: Emerging techniques and evidence-based strategies – a narrative review. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 87(11), 7338-7346.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000003911
14. Gunda, S. & Bekkam, G. J. (2021). Comparison of prophylactic ephedrine with crystalloid preloading for prevention of hypotension due to spinal anaesthesia for caesarian sections. Intl J Med Res Health Sci. 10(12), 98-103.
15. Andemeskel, Y. M., Brhane, D. H., MohammedAli, J. A., & Habtetsion, T. M. (2024). Comparison of crystalloid Preloading versus ephedrine prophylaxis to prevent spinal anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean delivery: A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesia and Critical Care, 06(01).
https://doi.org/10.26502/acc.067
16. Mahmoud Soliman, A. H. (2021). Comparing the effect of volume preload versus ephedrine infusion for the prevention of hypotension due to spinal anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower limb vascular surgery. Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research, 4(1), 26.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmisr.jmisr_68_20
17. Munir, S., Boota, M., & Kiyani, F. (2013). Comparison of ephedrine versus fluid preload in prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Pak Armed Forces Med J, 63(1).
18. Aziz, N., Bangash, R., & Khan, P. (2013). Comparison between ephedrine and phenylephrine in the prevention of post spinal hypotension during elective cesarean section. Journal of Medical Sciences, 21(1), 27-30.
https://jmedsci.com/index.php/Jmedsci/article/view/369
19. Jawaid, Z., Gul Bano Tariq, R. A., ul Haq, I., Saeed, S., & Bahadur, S. (2019). Prevention of hypotension in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: Effect of Preloading with Crystalloid versus Colloid Infusion. In Medical Forum Monthly (Vol. 30, No. 11).
https://medicalforummonthly.com/index.php/mfm/article/view/3907
20. Khan, M. U., Memon, A. S., Ishaq, M., & Aqil, M. (2015). Preload versus coload and vasopressor requirement for the prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in nonobstetric patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 25(12), 851-5.
21. Zahid, T. R., Hinna, R., Farooq, U., Waraich, A. A., Bashir, R., & Ali, I. (2024). Effect of crystalloid administration timing on hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Preload versus Coload: A study at a tertiary care hospital in Rawalpindi. Life and Science, 5(4), 06.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indus Journal of Bioscience Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
